Washington 2020: The Calm Before the Drizzle
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 08:09:17 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Washington 2020: The Calm Before the Drizzle
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 196 197 198 199 200 [201] 202 203 204 205 206 ... 252
Author Topic: Washington 2020: The Calm Before the Drizzle  (Read 847885 times)
publicunofficial
angryGreatness
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,010
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5000 on: November 12, 2016, 03:28:00 PM »

Another close result: In Grays Harbor, Pat McCarthy leads Bob Miloscia by ONE vote. 11,399 to 11,398
Logged
publicunofficial
angryGreatness
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,010
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5001 on: November 12, 2016, 04:41:51 PM »



Check out the urban/suburban divide on ST3.
Logged
KingSweden
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,227
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5002 on: November 12, 2016, 07:46:09 PM »



Check out the urban/suburban divide on ST3.

Redmond really wants their part of the line finished, clearly
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,778


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5003 on: November 12, 2016, 07:57:13 PM »

Some more results from around the state:

CityCountyClintonTrumpJohnsonStein
OthelloAdams42.351.44.3
RitzvilleAdams25.068.84.2
ForksClallam34.458.64.3
Port AngelesClallam51.940.84.5
SequimClallam51.143.43.0
AberdeenGrays Harbor43.648.94.7
HoquiamGrays Harbor47.244.55.2
Ocean ShoresGrays Harbor47.847.03.2
Camano IslandIsland46.547.14.7
Oak HarborIsland38.950.67.7
Port LudlowJefferson52.841.34.0
Port TownsendJefferson77.714.52.44.7
Bainbridge IslandKitsap80.114.63.6
BremertonKitsap54.234.77.6
Port OrchardKitsap44.945.07.6
AnacortesSkagit56.137.84.0
BurlingtonSkagit44.946.86.0
Mount VernonSkagit55.038.34.5
Sedro-WooleySkagit42.049.55.8
CheneySpokane48.039.08.2
Liberty LakeSpokane35.956.56.0
SpokaneSpokane52.438.05.7
Spokane ValleySpokane37.154.15.9
LaceyThurston54.536.76.0
OlympiaThurston70.520.93.84.0
TumwaterThurston56.334.45.9
YelmThurston33.054.89.2
College PlaceWalla Walla35.956.16.1
Walla WallaWalla Walla47.846.04.0
PullmanWhitman69.821.55.7
Logged
KingSweden
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,227
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5004 on: November 12, 2016, 08:08:07 PM »

Wow at Walla Walla going D
Logged
Fuzzybigfoot
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,211
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5005 on: November 12, 2016, 10:34:57 PM »
« Edited: November 12, 2016, 10:40:48 PM by Fuzzybigfoot »

With only about 4,000 ballots left to count, here are the precinct results for Whatcom County.



                  Clinton    Trump       (MOV)            

Bellingham: 72.28%-19.63%  (52.65%)  

Ferndale:     45.50%-45.59%  (5 votes, lol)

Blaine:         49.20%-44.10%  (5.10%)

Lynden:       69.01%-24.52%  (44.49%)



Trump might be the only Republican in US history to get less than 20% of the vote in Bellingham.  It's too bad she's losing Ferndale by 5 votes out of over 5,000 total, but she's still winning the 42nd LD by about 2%.

I'm not surprised to see the smaller towns like Kendall and Custer swing hard towards Trump, considering their large percentage of low-income whites.  Likewise, it's also worth mentioning that the Northeast precinct by lake Whatcom went from being +10% Romeny to +15% Clinton, due to it's abundance of affluent whites who absolutely despise Trump.    

Also, lol at Trump for failing to hit 70% in Lynden.  
Logged
Alaska2392
NRS11
Rookie
**
Posts: 85
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5006 on: November 13, 2016, 11:52:02 AM »

Can we now FINALLY put to bed this notion that "Crazy King County" delivers big results to 3rd parties?

Stein is at 1.61% and Johnson at 3.95%.  So combined they overperformed about 1% vs the nation.

Logged
Seattle
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 786
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5007 on: November 13, 2016, 01:41:35 PM »

Well, third party + right-ins = 9.2% right now in King County. That's pretty high.
Logged
Seattle
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 786
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5008 on: November 14, 2016, 06:27:45 PM »

I've been following late returns and they've definitely been less pro-Clinton than the election day vote, even in King County. That's a change from the norm, isn't it?
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,778


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5009 on: November 14, 2016, 09:36:35 PM »

Clark County flipped to Trump by 5 votes.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5010 on: November 14, 2016, 09:59:29 PM »

I've been following late returns and they've definitely been less pro-Clinton than the election day vote, even in King County. That's a change from the norm, isn't it?

Yes, especially in King County, where late turns usually veer very Democratic.  Early ballot returns this year were way Democratic-skewed, and it looks like that's showing up in the results.
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,778


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5011 on: November 14, 2016, 10:29:55 PM »

Does anyone have any inclination why Whitman County's turnout is down over 50% from 2012? It's not like the population's declined.
Logged
BigSkyBob
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,531


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5012 on: November 15, 2016, 03:46:54 AM »
« Edited: November 15, 2016, 04:16:57 AM by BigSkyBob »

Looking towards the legislature:

There are still some 600k votes left to be counted, so results can still be swayed (particularly in King(200k)/Pierce(90k)/Snohomish(80k)).

House:
Ds are currently at a very tenuous +1. It could shift to no net change or even up to +4.

Of particular note, LD30 (Federal Way) just voted out both of its incumbent Rs, so D+2 there. R+1 in nearby LD31 (rural farms of King and Pierce), where longtime "independent D" incumbent Chris Hurst retired.

LD19, on the coast, swung massively to Trump. He most likely won this traditionally conservadem district. Anyway, Dean Takko upgraded to the senate and so his house seat was left open. It's currently a D hold, but oh so barely. Teresa Purcell (D) leads by 83 votes. Takko and the other D incumbent, Blake, won easily, but under-performed.

Then we have LD5 (Issaquah, North Bend, Snoqualmie), where both house seats are very close, Jay Rodne (R, inc) leads Jason Ritchie (D) by 3%, though Ritchie originally lead. Idk where the votes are in this district, but its not likely this will flip. Graves (R) leads Burner (D) in the open seat by 5.5%.

Finally, there's R-held, open seats in LD17 (newly annexed Vancouver and other PDX suburbs), where Vicki Craft (R) leads Sam Kim (Independent D) by 3%.

Senate
Litzow finally succumbed to the fundamentals of LD41 (Mercer Island, Bellevue, Sammamish), that most likely will have voted D+40 for Clinton. Lisa Wellman (D) leads by 5.5%.

Chad Magendanz (R), tried to upgrade his LD5 house position, but it looks like he's fallen short and trails incumbent Mark Mullet (D)by 2.5%.

The only other really competitive race is in LD28 (parts of Tacoma, Lakewood, JBLM), where incumbent Steve O'Ban (R) leads Marisa Peloquin (D) by 6%.

So D+1, but also keep in mind, I think the Ds will also pick up Andy Hill's seat, which won't be very competitive with a Trump presidency (another district that voted massively for Clinton).

Jim Walsh is now ahead of Teresa Purcell by 76 votes in LD19 [Lewis County had over a third of the ballots uncounted on election night.] Chad Magendanz is now within 1.38% in LD5, and Terri Hickey is now down 1.92% in LD30.
Logged
publicunofficial
angryGreatness
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,010
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5013 on: November 15, 2016, 04:14:53 PM »

If Jaime Beutler wasn't ultra safe before, she certainly is going forward
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5014 on: November 15, 2016, 08:18:14 PM »

Clark County just unexpectedly flipped back to Clinton.

Does anyone have any inclination why Whitman County's turnout is down over 50% from 2012? It's not like the population's declined.

Pullman turnout looks absolutely terrible, which is a big part of why the county is even close right now.  But above that, their Auditor's department is also terrible.  They report as only 72% counted.
Logged
BigSkyBob
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,531


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5015 on: November 15, 2016, 10:29:21 PM »

Looking towards the legislature:

There are still some 600k votes left to be counted, so results can still be swayed (particularly in King(200k)/Pierce(90k)/Snohomish(80k)).

House:
Ds are currently at a very tenuous +1. It could shift to no net change or even up to +4.

Of particular note, LD30 (Federal Way) just voted out both of its incumbent Rs, so D+2 there. R+1 in nearby LD31 (rural farms of King and Pierce), where longtime "independent D" incumbent Chris Hurst retired.

LD19, on the coast, swung massively to Trump. He most likely won this traditionally conservadem district. Anyway, Dean Takko upgraded to the senate and so his house seat was left open. It's currently a D hold, but oh so barely. Teresa Purcell (D) leads by 83 votes. Takko and the other D incumbent, Blake, won easily, but under-performed.

Then we have LD5 (Issaquah, North Bend, Snoqualmie), where both house seats are very close, Jay Rodne (R, inc) leads Jason Ritchie (D) by 3%, though Ritchie originally lead. Idk where the votes are in this district, but its not likely this will flip. Graves (R) leads Burner (D) in the open seat by 5.5%.

Finally, there's R-held, open seats in LD17 (newly annexed Vancouver and other PDX suburbs), where Vicki Craft (R) leads Sam Kim (Independent D) by 3%.

Senate
Litzow finally succumbed to the fundamentals of LD41 (Mercer Island, Bellevue, Sammamish), that most likely will have voted D+40 for Clinton. Lisa Wellman (D) leads by 5.5%.

Chad Magendanz (R), tried to upgrade his LD5 house position, but it looks like he's fallen short and trails incumbent Mark Mullet (D)by 2.5%.

The only other really competitive race is in LD28 (parts of Tacoma, Lakewood, JBLM), where incumbent Steve O'Ban (R) leads Marisa Peloquin (D) by 6%.

So D+1, but also keep in mind, I think the Ds will also pick up Andy Hill's seat, which won't be very competitive with a Trump presidency (another district that voted massively for Clinton).

Jim Walsh is now ahead of Teresa Purcell by 76 votes in LD19 [Lewis County had over a third of the ballots uncounted on election night.] Chad Magendanz is now within 1.38% in LD5, and Teri Hickey is now down 1.92% in LD30.
Jim Walsh is now 127 votes ahead, with most the outstanding ballots in Lewis County. He should win. Madgendanz is within 1.22%, and Teri Hickey is within  1.76%
Logged
publicunofficial
angryGreatness
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,010
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5016 on: November 15, 2016, 11:40:33 PM »

Clark County just unexpectedly flipped back to Clinton.

Does anyone have any inclination why Whitman County's turnout is down over 50% from 2012? It's not like the population's declined.

Pullman turnout looks absolutely terrible, which is a big part of why the county is even close right now.  But above that, their Auditor's department is also terrible.  They report as only 72% counted.

If Pullman turnout is low, why did Whitman go blue this year after being a Romney county?
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,778


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5017 on: November 16, 2016, 12:18:47 AM »
« Edited: November 16, 2016, 12:24:42 AM by realisticidealist »

If Pullman turnout is low, why did Whitman go blue this year after being a Romney county?

Among (many) other things, all the Romney-voting Mormons here (~5% of the pop) wrote-in McMullin or didn't vote.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5018 on: November 16, 2016, 12:41:19 AM »
« Edited: November 16, 2016, 12:53:39 AM by Alcon »

Clark County just unexpectedly flipped back to Clinton.

Does anyone have any inclination why Whitman County's turnout is down over 50% from 2012? It's not like the population's declined.

Pullman turnout looks absolutely terrible, which is a big part of why the county is even close right now.  But above that, their Auditor's department is also terrible.  They report as only 72% counted.

If Pullman turnout is low, why did Whitman go blue this year after being a Romney county?

Not sure about the write-in explanation...Whitman isn't reporting an unusual number of those.  The biggest factor is that Pullman is actually a pretty college-educated city even outside of its university population, and Trump took it on the chin there.  Obama won by 28 points in 2012; this year, Clinton is winning by at least 42.  And turnout wasn't that bad outside of the WSU campus (should have clarified).  Pullman's vote total should fall from 8,627 last time to just over 8,000 this time.  The county is overall on track to cast more votes, though, and that will limit Clinton's margin of victory despite the impressive Pullman swing, because Pullman will be a lower % of the county vote, and Trump did just fine in places like Colfax.

(Fast math, hopefully I didn't miss something)
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,778


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5019 on: November 16, 2016, 02:32:39 AM »
« Edited: November 16, 2016, 02:38:33 AM by realisticidealist »

I'm going through the Pullman precinct results more carefully. It seems the high-growth, cookie-cutter suburban developments in the west of town saw the best turnout, either essentially flat or even up. These areas have seen rapid building and quickly climbing property values; as SEL's expanded, the engineers have been buying them up like crazy as it's pretty much the only such area in town. Unsurprisingly, this area saw a large swing against Trump compared to 2012.

Turnout was down on campus, but not uniformly so. There was a massive turnout decline (so far) in the dorm precincts on the south side of campus and a slightly smaller, although still large, drop-off in the Greek Row area on the north side of campus (Greek Row featured Johnson's second best performance in town). A couple apartment complex areas to the east and northeast side of campus actually swung toward Trump with relatively small turnout declines, particularly the area around Banyans Golf Club; not many people live out on the east side of town, however.

The more heavily Mormon apartment complexes on the northeast side of town swung moderately toward Hillary, but only because Trump's share crashed there; Hillary's proportion stayed constant from 2012 to 2016, but Johnson did his best of anywhere in town here (tied Trump for second), although these numbers don't include the write-ins, which I believe were notable here.

Off-campus, there was also a strong swing to Hillary in the area to the north of town that's been undergoing large-scale apartment building. Even though the area is almost entirely students, turnout compared to 2012 wasn't awful there due to a relatively large population increase. The area is fairly East Asian as of 2010, but I suspect the proportion may have declined since then with an influx of white and Arab students in the new developments.

Just north of this is a precinct that is a weird mix of SEL-types, Mormons, and pet-friendly students. Johnson got this third and final >10% performance here, although turnout was quite down from 2012. SEL's been buying up lots of land here to build a second facility for the next phase of their expansion.

Military Hill on the northwest side of town saw rather stable turnout from 2012 and a much smaller swing than the rest of town. This isn't overly surprising as the area is mostly townie-types in older neighborhoods who keep themselves separate from the WSU student areas. Most professors and administrators live on either Sunnyside Hill (which saw a strong swing to Clinton and relatively strong turnout) or on Pioneer Hill (which saw a modest swing to Clinton and relatively strong turnout), but not as much on Military Hill.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5020 on: November 16, 2016, 08:44:28 AM »

Thanks realistic!  Interesting stuff.
Logged
mds32
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,090
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5021 on: November 16, 2016, 10:57:06 AM »

Dino Rossi could be appointed to Andy Hill's vacant Senate Seat.

Could Rossi actually hold the seat in the special election for Republicans?
http://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/politics/dino-rossi-says-hes-willing-to-temporarily-replace-hill-in-state-senate/
Logged
publicunofficial
angryGreatness
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,010
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5022 on: November 16, 2016, 01:35:33 PM »

Dino Rossi could be appointed to Andy Hill's vacant Senate Seat.

Could Rossi actually hold the seat in the special election for Republicans?
http://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/politics/dino-rossi-says-hes-willing-to-temporarily-replace-hill-in-state-senate/

A few years ago Rossi was appointed to fill a Senate vacancy in a different district. He didn't run for the open seat then; don't see why he would now in a district that would be even harder to hold. I think he's done with politics for the most part.
Logged
KingSweden
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,227
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5023 on: November 16, 2016, 01:41:51 PM »

Dino Rossi could be appointed to Andy Hill's vacant Senate Seat.

Could Rossi actually hold the seat in the special election for Republicans?
http://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/politics/dino-rossi-says-hes-willing-to-temporarily-replace-hill-in-state-senate/

A few years ago Rossi was appointed to fill a Senate vacancy in a different district. He didn't run for the open seat then; don't see why he would now in a district that would be even harder to hold. I think he's done with politics for the most part.

He'd probably hold til the special and step down again. Have to imagine Goodman or Isenhower run and take it. Wonder who GOP would run if Rossi is there as placeholder - can't imagine there's another Hill out there
Logged
Seattle
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 786
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5024 on: November 16, 2016, 02:04:39 PM »

I think the only person the Rs could run and win with is King County Council member Kathy Lambert. I have no idea if she would want to, considering she left the state house for her current position.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 196 197 198 199 200 [201] 202 203 204 205 206 ... 252  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.075 seconds with 12 queries.