Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 24, 2014, 11:09:35 am
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Please delete your old personal messages.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
| |-+  Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: Bacon King)
| | |-+  Name the next three U.S. Presidents
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 ... 23 Print
Author Topic: Name the next three U.S. Presidents  (Read 79682 times)
DownWithTheLeft
downwithdaleft
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 18880
Italy


Political Matrix
E: 9.16, S: -3.13

View Profile
« Reply #50 on: June 27, 2008, 03:30:12 pm »
Ignore

While at least you admitted Georgia is trending Republican.
Logged

Gov. Christopher J. Christie
SPC
Chuck Hagel 08
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8959
Greece


View Profile
« Reply #51 on: June 27, 2008, 03:41:12 pm »
Ignore

Barack H. Obama (2009-2013)
Mark Sanford (2013-2021)
Rand Paul (2021-2029)
Logged

Endorsements: Sen: Broun (GA), Bevin (KY), Wolf (KS), McDaniel (MS), Brannon (NC), Bright (SC)
House: Amash (MI), Massie (KY), Duncan (TN), McClintock (CA), Sanford (SC), Jones (NC), Huelskamp (KS), Loudermilk (GA), Emmer (MN), Richardson (ME), Raths (CA), DeMaio (CA), Dietzel (LA), Lonegan (NJ), Didier (WA), Mooney (WV), Mathis (AL)
Gov: LePage (ME), Coleman (AR), Melvin (AZ), Donnelly (CA)
NDN
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3542
Uganda


View Profile
« Reply #52 on: June 27, 2008, 03:53:41 pm »
Ignore

McCain: 2008-2012
Warner: 2012-2020
Jindal: 2020-2028
Jindal will be unelectable in a few years, if not already. Otherwise that's not an implausible list.
Logged


ABANDON ALL HOPE
Хahar
Xahar
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 38397
Bangladesh


View Profile
« Reply #53 on: June 27, 2008, 04:30:32 pm »
Ignore

Barack H. Obama (2009-2013)
Mark Sanford (2013-2021)
Rand Paul (2021-2029)

IIRC, he's just like his dad. IIRC, his dad failed to win a single state.
Logged

Update reading list

The idea of parodying the preceding Atlasian's postings is laughable, of course, but not for reasons one might expect.
DownWithTheLeft
downwithdaleft
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 18880
Italy


Political Matrix
E: 9.16, S: -3.13

View Profile
« Reply #54 on: June 27, 2008, 05:10:46 pm »
Ignore

That doesn't mean that Rand Paul couldn't get elected in 12 years, just as Reagan couldn't get elected in 1976 let alone 1968
Logged

Gov. Christopher J. Christie
bgwah
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 13663
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

View Profile
« Reply #55 on: June 27, 2008, 05:20:56 pm »
Ignore

lol, Jindal has about a 0.0001% chance of ever becoming President.
Logged

War on Want
Evilmexicandictator
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7688
Uzbekistan


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -8.00

View Profile
« Reply #56 on: June 27, 2008, 06:54:55 pm »
Ignore

Palin v. Landrieu?  Do you really the Dems will nominate a moderate who is either out of office or barely winning?  BTW, LOL @ NC, GA, and LA voting Dem

LA did in 1992 and 1996. Also by that time, GA and NC will both have around 10 to 11 million people live in them states, Most from up North moving down because the cost of living is lower and the weather is better.
1.) VT has voted Republican more times any state, in fact up until 1992, I don't know the last time they didn't.  Is it going to be a GOP bastion soon?
2.) More people does not equal more Democratic, Georgia is growing a lot and is moving right

GA isn't moving right or left right now, its holding steady, but I see it being more Democratic at the natonal level, but saying republican at the local level. Also  LA would go Democratic because the Mary is from there, and 99% of the time the candidate wins their home state.
1.) No, you can't argue Georgia is not moving to the right, its a fact not an opinion

It isn't anymore. Most of the growth to its suburbs recently hasn't been as Republican, as before and I think it is holding steady now.
Logged
War on Want
Evilmexicandictator
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7688
Uzbekistan


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -8.00

View Profile
« Reply #57 on: June 27, 2008, 06:55:22 pm »
Ignore

That doesn't mean that Rand Paul couldn't get elected in 12 years, just as Reagan couldn't get elected in 1976 let alone 1968
Nope because Libertarianism will never be popular enough to allow for it.
Logged
War on Want
Evilmexicandictator
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7688
Uzbekistan


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -8.00

View Profile
« Reply #58 on: June 27, 2008, 06:58:04 pm »
Ignore

Barack Obama(2009-2017)
Sarah Palin(2017-2025)
Pancho Villa from Phoenix, Arizona(2025-2029)
Logged
Хahar
Xahar
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 38397
Bangladesh


View Profile
« Reply #59 on: June 28, 2008, 12:42:09 am »
Ignore

Pancho Villa from Phoenix, Arizona(2025-2029)

Nice name.
Logged

Update reading list

The idea of parodying the preceding Atlasian's postings is laughable, of course, but not for reasons one might expect.
Reaganfan
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 12183
United States


View Profile
« Reply #60 on: June 28, 2008, 04:08:17 am »
Ignore

How about this?

OBAMA 2009-2013
JINDAL 2013-2021
WARNER 2021-2029

With the exception of the four years of Obama....this timeline isn't all that bad as Mark Warner isn't all that extreme a Democrat.
Logged

NDN
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3542
Uganda


View Profile
« Reply #61 on: June 28, 2008, 04:16:33 am »
Ignore

Come on Mike, do you really think Americans are going to go for an ultra-conservative Catholic Indian who performs exorcisms?
Logged


ABANDON ALL HOPE
HardRCafé
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4404
Italy
View Profile
« Reply #62 on: June 28, 2008, 04:31:56 am »
Ignore

It makes about as much sense as a just elected Chicago pol Teddy Kennedy was still calling "Osama" just yesterday.

And no, that is not a swipe at Obama.
Logged

DownWithTheLeft
downwithdaleft
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 18880
Italy


Political Matrix
E: 9.16, S: -3.13

View Profile
« Reply #63 on: June 28, 2008, 07:46:46 am »
Ignore

That doesn't mean that Rand Paul couldn't get elected in 12 years, just as Reagan couldn't get elected in 1976 let alone 1968
Nope because Libertarianism will never be popular enough to allow for it.
Just as conservatism was not popular enough in 1964?  Or just as Democracy was not too popular before the revolution?  Can I have a look into your crystal ball that tells you how America will feel in 10 years?
Logged

Gov. Christopher J. Christie
Albus Dumbledore
Havelock Vetinari
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1943
Congo, The Democratic Republic of the


Political Matrix
E: -0.71, S: -2.17

View Profile
« Reply #64 on: June 29, 2008, 09:20:44 am »
Ignore

McCain
Ford
Kyanka
Logged

"348. The rest of the party appreciates it if I don't start the game in Cyberpsychosis."
"I will kill 120,000 people" ~ Barack Obama
The United States is not only the world's first suburban nation, but it will also be its last. The world cannot sustain any more economies like ours. - Kenneth T. Jackson
HardRCafé
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4404
Italy
View Profile
« Reply #65 on: June 29, 2008, 10:47:03 pm »
Ignore

That doesn't mean that Rand Paul couldn't get elected in 12 years, just as Reagan couldn't get elected in 1976 let alone 1968
Nope because Libertarianism will never be popular enough to allow for it.
Just as conservatism was not popular enough in 1964?  Or just as Democracy was not too popular before the revolution?  Can I have a look into your crystal ball that tells you how America will feel in 10 years?

Because anti-Semitism and hardcore drug abuse are not that rampant here.
Logged

Miamiu1027
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 35356
United States
View Profile
« Reply #66 on: July 01, 2008, 12:39:16 am »
Ignore

just to be interesting since this is stupid

Obama '09-'14 (assassinated)
Webb '14-17
random hispanic Republican state legislator '17-'25
Logged
Albus Dumbledore
Havelock Vetinari
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1943
Congo, The Democratic Republic of the


Political Matrix
E: -0.71, S: -2.17

View Profile
« Reply #67 on: July 01, 2008, 09:24:40 am »
Ignore

Webb isn't going to be veep.
Logged

"348. The rest of the party appreciates it if I don't start the game in Cyberpsychosis."
"I will kill 120,000 people" ~ Barack Obama
The United States is not only the world's first suburban nation, but it will also be its last. The world cannot sustain any more economies like ours. - Kenneth T. Jackson
MasterJedi
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 17965
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.65, S: 6.43

View Profile
« Reply #68 on: July 01, 2008, 04:57:10 pm »
Ignore

Two scenarios:

John McCain 2009-2013
Mark Warner 2013-2021
Bobby Jindal or Sarah Palin 2021-2029


Barack Obama 2009-2013
Bobby Jindal 2013-2021
Who the hell knows 2021- ?
Logged

Mideast Assemblyman Ben
benconstine
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 30396
United States


View Profile
« Reply #69 on: July 01, 2008, 05:00:52 pm »
Ignore

That doesn't mean that Rand Paul couldn't get elected in 12 years, just as Reagan couldn't get elected in 1976 let alone 1968
Nope because Libertarianism will never be popular enough to allow for it.
Just as conservatism was not popular enough in 1964?  Or just as Democracy was not too popular before the revolution?  Can I have a look into your crystal ball that tells you how America will feel in 10 years?

America will not support an utter lunatic; therefore, Paul will never win.
Logged

Obama High's debate team:

"Now let me be clear...I...I...um...uh...now let me be clear.  I strongly condemn the affirmative in the strongest possible terms, and I am closely monitoring their arguments.  Let me be clear on this."
DownWithTheLeft
downwithdaleft
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 18880
Italy


Political Matrix
E: 9.16, S: -3.13

View Profile
« Reply #70 on: July 01, 2008, 10:14:29 pm »
Ignore

That doesn't mean that Rand Paul couldn't get elected in 12 years, just as Reagan couldn't get elected in 1976 let alone 1968
Nope because Libertarianism will never be popular enough to allow for it.
Just as conservatism was not popular enough in 1964?  Or just as Democracy was not too popular before the revolution?  Can I have a look into your crystal ball that tells you how America will feel in 10 years?

America will not support an utter lunatic; therefore, Paul will never win.
Really?  Then how do you explain Barack Obama's rise to power?  Obviously you do not think he will the election if an "utter lunatic" cannot win
Logged

Gov. Christopher J. Christie
War on Want
Evilmexicandictator
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7688
Uzbekistan


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -8.00

View Profile
« Reply #71 on: July 01, 2008, 10:44:15 pm »
Ignore

That doesn't mean that Rand Paul couldn't get elected in 12 years, just as Reagan couldn't get elected in 1976 let alone 1968
Nope because Libertarianism will never be popular enough to allow for it.
Just as conservatism was not popular enough in 1964?  Or just as Democracy was not too popular before the revolution?  Can I have a look into your crystal ball that tells you how America will feel in 10 years?

America will not support an utter lunatic; therefore, Paul will never win.
Really?  Then how do you explain Barack Obama's rise to power?  Obviously you do not think he will the election if an "utter lunatic" cannot win
Shut up, I don't care what you think about the man, but 75% of the country thinks that Paul's views are those of a lunatic and at the most 40% of the country thinks Obama's views are those of a lunatic.
Logged
SPC
Chuck Hagel 08
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8959
Greece


View Profile
« Reply #72 on: July 04, 2008, 08:52:48 pm »
Ignore

That doesn't mean that Rand Paul couldn't get elected in 12 years, just as Reagan couldn't get elected in 1976 let alone 1968
Nope because Libertarianism will never be popular enough to allow for it.
Just as conservatism was not popular enough in 1964?  Or just as Democracy was not too popular before the revolution?  Can I have a look into your crystal ball that tells you how America will feel in 10 years?

America will not support an utter lunatic; therefore, Paul will never win.
Really?  Then how do you explain Barack Obama's rise to power?  Obviously you do not think he will the election if an "utter lunatic" cannot win
Shut up, I don't care what you think about the man, but 75% of the country thinks that Paul's views are those of a lunatic and at the most 40% of the country thinks Obama's views are those of a lunatic.

Because the majority's always right, right? (Except for the War in Iraq, global cooling, the Holocaust, eugenics, Communism, the Inquisition, etc.)
Logged

Endorsements: Sen: Broun (GA), Bevin (KY), Wolf (KS), McDaniel (MS), Brannon (NC), Bright (SC)
House: Amash (MI), Massie (KY), Duncan (TN), McClintock (CA), Sanford (SC), Jones (NC), Huelskamp (KS), Loudermilk (GA), Emmer (MN), Richardson (ME), Raths (CA), DeMaio (CA), Dietzel (LA), Lonegan (NJ), Didier (WA), Mooney (WV), Mathis (AL)
Gov: LePage (ME), Coleman (AR), Melvin (AZ), Donnelly (CA)
War on Want
Evilmexicandictator
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7688
Uzbekistan


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -8.00

View Profile
« Reply #73 on: July 04, 2008, 09:00:31 pm »
Ignore

That doesn't mean that Rand Paul couldn't get elected in 12 years, just as Reagan couldn't get elected in 1976 let alone 1968
Nope because Libertarianism will never be popular enough to allow for it.
Just as conservatism was not popular enough in 1964?  Or just as Democracy was not too popular before the revolution?  Can I have a look into your crystal ball that tells you how America will feel in 10 years?

America will not support an utter lunatic; therefore, Paul will never win.
Really?  Then how do you explain Barack Obama's rise to power?  Obviously you do not think he will the election if an "utter lunatic" cannot win
Shut up, I don't care what you think about the man, but 75% of the country thinks that Paul's views are those of a lunatic and at the most 40% of the country thinks Obama's views are those of a lunatic.

Because the majority's always right, right? (Except for the War in Iraq, global cooling, the Holocaust, eugenics, Communism, the Inquisition, etc.)
This is about his chances of winning an election not about whether he is right or not.
Logged
MatthewZD
Full Member
***
Posts: 119
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.58, S: -1.04

View Profile
« Reply #74 on: July 05, 2008, 11:26:05 am »
Ignore

John McCain (2009-2013)
Mark Warner (2013-2021)
Sarah Palin or more likely someone not on the national scene (2021-?Huh)

Barack Obama  (2009-2013)
Mitt Romney (2013-2017)
Mark Warner (2017-2025)

My gut tells me that the next POTUS will be a one-termer, whether it's McCain or Obama.  If it's McCain, it'll be another close election in 2012 with Warner winning against either a very visibly aged McCain or against the VP since McCain has decided not to seek re-election.  Warner is easily re-elected in 2016 and Palin wins a very close election in 2020.

If it's Obama, the GOP is energized behind Romney in 2012, who wins a close election but loses to Warner in 2016.
Logged


If you ran a company whose only strategy was to tear down the competition, it wouldn’t last long. So why is this wisdom so hard to find in Washington?... if an idea works, it really doesn’t matter if it has an ‘R’ or ‘D’ next to it ... Because this election isn’t about liberal versus conservative. It’s not about left versus right. It’s about the future versus the past.
Mark Warner, 2008 DNC
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 ... 23 Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines