US Senate InTrade rankings
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 09:49:45 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  US Senate InTrade rankings
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: US Senate InTrade rankings  (Read 2398 times)
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,734


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: June 11, 2008, 01:13:59 AM »
« edited: June 11, 2008, 01:56:59 PM by ○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└ »

Seats ranked by Democratic odds

DE 97.5
IL 97.0
AR 95.0
IA 95.0
MT 95.0
MA 94.5
RI 92.5
WV 92.5
MI 91.0
VA 82.5
NJ 80.0
SD 80.0
NM 79.0
NH 68.0
CO 65.0
MS 62.5 (special)
AK 60.0
LA 56.0
NC 44.0
MN 43.0
OR 35.8
KY 33.5
ME 23.7
NE 22.0
TX 22.0
ID 15.5
KS 13.5
TN 10.0
OK 7.5
WY 7.5 (special)
GA 7.0
MS 5.0
WY 5.0
SC 5.0
AL 3.5

LA is the only Democratic seat below 80.0. VA is a Republican seat above 80.0, so NJ & SD are the critical seats for the Democrats retaining the Senate; NM if they throw Lieberman under a bus.

Number of Democrats expected
Indys who caucus with Democrats not counted

<45  0.1
45-50 1.0
51-55 48.0
56-60 40.0
61-65 11.5
>66 0.2


There are only 1.1% odds that the Democrats will not gain more than 1 seat.
The money seems to be on 56.
There's no option for exactly 66 seats.
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,731
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: June 11, 2008, 01:18:21 AM »

MS at 62.5, eh? There must be a lot of Harrys.
Logged
nclib
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,304
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: June 11, 2008, 09:04:13 AM »


Huh
Logged
DownWithTheLeft
downwithdaleft
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,548
Italy


Political Matrix
E: 9.16, S: -3.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: June 11, 2008, 09:26:26 AM »

And Alaska at 60?  Seems pretty skewed to the Dems, although I am assuming SC is a typo or something
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,734


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: June 11, 2008, 01:57:22 PM »


InTrade is down, but I changed that to 5.0.
Logged
Verily
Cuivienen
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,663


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: June 11, 2008, 03:18:01 PM »
« Edited: June 11, 2008, 03:20:24 PM by Verily »

And Alaska at 60?  Seems pretty skewed to the Dems, although I am assuming SC is a typo or something

You do know that Stevens is trailing in all polls, right? And that his corruption scandal is only going to get worse? I'd say Alaska is probably more likely for the Democrats than New Hampshire and Colorado at this point.

Also, given that Mark Pryor will be opposed only by the Green Party, shouldn't Arkansas be the safest Democratic seat? Free money...
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,734


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: June 11, 2008, 03:22:00 PM »


Also, given that Mark Pryor will be opposed only by the Green Party, shouldn't Arkansas be the safest Democratic seat? Free money...

The ones at 95.0 or 5.0 may not have had a trade. Anything >=95 or <=5 should be considered rock solid.
Logged
7,052,770
Harry
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,420
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: June 11, 2008, 06:39:01 PM »

or just most people outside this forum aren't so convinced of a Wicker victory.
Logged
Small Business Owner of Any Repute
Mr. Moderate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,431
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: June 11, 2008, 08:36:15 PM »

or just most people outside this forum aren't so convinced of a Wicker victory.

Intrade does little more than following the polls.  I made a good chunk of change playing the expectation game in Maine's gubernatorial race in '06.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,734


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: July 02, 2008, 09:13:07 PM »
« Edited: July 02, 2008, 09:15:52 PM by ○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└ »

Seats ranked by Democratic odds

DE 97.5
IL 97.0
IA 95.0
MA 94.5
MT 93.7
RI 92.5
WV 92.5
MI 91.0
AR 90.0
NM 85.5
VA 81.1
SD 81.0
NJ 77.5
NH 74.0
CO 70.1
MS 60.0 (special)
LA 60.0
AK 55.0
MN 40.0
OR 40.0
NC 35.0
KY 33.5
TX 30.0
KS 27.0
ME 26.0
NE 14.0
ID 11.4
TN 10.0
SC 8.1
WY 8.0 (special)
OK 7.5
GA 7.0
WY 5.0
AL 3.5
MS 0.5

LA is the only Democratic seat below 77.  VA and NM rank above 77, and so the critical seat for
retaining the Senate with a Democratic VP: VA
retaining the Senate w/o a Democratic VP: SD
retaining the Senate or with a Dem VP while throwing Lieberman under a bus: SD
retaining the Senate w/o a Democratic VP while throwing Lieberman under a bus: NJ

Number of Democrats expected
Indys who caucus with Democrats not counted

<45  0.1
45-50 0.5
51-55 45.0
56-60 39.1
61-65 10.1
66 odds not given
>66 0.2
Median seems to be 56
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,955


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: July 03, 2008, 08:17:17 AM »

Seats ranked by Democratic odds

DE 97.5
IL 97.0
AR 95.0
IA 95.0
MT 95.0
MA 94.5
RI 92.5

All of these except for Delaware are as safe as a CD and pay better interest. What's the catch?
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: July 03, 2008, 11:08:44 AM »

Seats ranked by Democratic odds

DE 97.5
IL 97.0
AR 95.0
IA 95.0
MT 95.0
MA 94.5
RI 92.5

All of these except for Delaware are as safe as a CD and pay better interest. What's the catch?

as a non-pricemaker you have to pay fees to Intrade on your profits.
Logged
Small Business Owner of Any Repute
Mr. Moderate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,431
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: July 03, 2008, 01:39:00 PM »

as a non-pricemaker you have to pay fees to Intrade on your profits.

Actually, everyone has to pay fees on their profits.  It's only the non-pricemakers who have to pay fees on their trades.

Investing 97.5 to win 100 is essentially a losing propostion on Intrade.
Logged
DownWithTheLeft
downwithdaleft
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,548
Italy


Political Matrix
E: 9.16, S: -3.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: July 03, 2008, 01:45:26 PM »

Well, at least they realize NJ is the GOP second best opportunity
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.036 seconds with 11 queries.