Atlas Senate Matchups

[Gustaf]

Atlas Senate Matchups:

1. YoungRepub (R-NY) v. Miamiu1027 (D-NY)
1a. KEmperor (R-NY) v. Huck finn (D-NY)
2. Immy (D-ID) v. Mr. Fresh (R-ID)
3. Migrendel (D-MA) or JohnFKennedy (D-MA) v. Pete Bell (I-MA)
4. ZorkPolitics (R-NJ) v. MAS117 (D-NJ) or emergingDmajority1 (D-NJ)
5. Jravnsbo (D-MN) v. Gustaf (D-MN)
6. Nclib (D-NC) v. GWBFan (R-GA)
7. 9Iron768 (R-MI) v. Christopher Michael (D-MI) [Health Concerns?  Replacements: Nym90 (if loss in presidential election), JftDem (hasn't posted in a long time), or play a Mel Carnahan, (run the generic Dem out there and appoint somebody)]
8. Agcat (R-TX) or M (R-TX) v. Harry (D-MS) [If loses VP bid; replacements: Carey (I-TX), run generic Democrat.)
9. Demrepdan (R-IL) v. Hughento (D-IA)
10. PD (R-CA) or TheWildCard (R-CA) v. Michael Z (D-DC)
11. Nhpolitico (R-NH) v. New Hampshire democrat (I don't remember him name)
12. Opebo (R-MO) v. Of_ThisNation (R-MD)
13. Dazzleman (R-CT) v. Beet (R-MD

What do you mean with match-ups? Many of those aren't from the same states.

[Gustaf]

We can go by logic on most of them.

1. Miamiu1027 wins
2. Huck Finn wins
3. Mr. Fresh Wins
4. Winner of D nomination wins
5. Winner of D nomination wins
6. Tossup
7. GWBFan wins
8. Tossup
9. Winner of R nomination wins
10. Tossup
11. Tossup (Espectially if Wild Card wins nomination)
12. Tossup
13. Tossup, lean Ofthisnation
14. Beet wins

6 D, 3R, 5 Tossups

I don't think TX would be a tossup. And I would be certain of the Dem primary in MN, since I'm the only Dem there.

[Gustaf]

It isn't, I said the winner of the R nomination would win.

It looks like I rigged this thing.

You said 8. was Agcat v Harry, and you said 8 would be a tossup.

[Gustaf]

Okay, I'll renumber tem to avoid confusion.

You mean you'll number them correctly now, so as to aviod confusion?

[Gustaf]

I still don't really get this...

[Gustaf]

I still don't really get this...

You don't have to, just beat Jravnsbo.

OK!

[Gustaf]

agreed, if it is held, may the best man win, if not, well each state has two members of the senate any way

Actually, this is my reason for questioning the purpose of this thread...there is no point unless there is actaully 3 people from a state all wanting to be governors.

[Gustaf]

governors? surely you mean senators?

Yeah...I do...I was thinking of governors, since if there's 3 people from a state, 1 can be governor and the other 2 senators.

[Gustaf]

Everyone who wants to be a senator will automatically become one, and we'll hold elections if there are more than 3 people wanting to be senators...both senatorial seats from CA are vacant, if PD wants to be a senator he'll have to give up his gubernatorial seat, leaving that to someone else. And so on.

[Gustaf]

Everyone who wants to be a senator will automatically become one, and we'll hold elections if there are more than 3 people wanting to be senators...both senatorial seats from CA are vacant, if PD wants to be a senator he'll have to give up his gubernatorial seat, leaving that to someone else. And so on.

I agree. But don't think for a minute that I'm giving up my gubernatorial seat. You guys took the presidency from me, I won't let you get close. Just leave me be and everything will be fine.

Lol...don't worry, I think the 2 CA Dems will be content with running for senatorial positions.