Well, that was fast

[A18]

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/chi-ap-il-guns-chicagolawsu,0,3486307.story

"Pro-gun groups filed a federal lawsuit Thursday challenging a long-standing Chicago handgun ban only hours after the U.S. Supreme Court's decision to strike down a similar ban in the District of Columbia."

[Хahar 🤔]

[Sam Spade]

That's not surprising, although San Fran would be just as good of a candidate.I suspect the NRA did it more for symbolic reasons, however.

[J. J.]

[Iosif is a COTHO]

Yeah! If there's one thing the city streets need more of, it's more guns!!

[Kaine for Senate '18]

No surprise.

[Flying Dog]

Good.

[DownWithTheLeft]

Certainly should be interesting, if only the court would take the final step to protect every citizen and reverse Roe v. Wade

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

That's not surprising, although San Fran would be just as good of a candidate.I suspect the NRA did it more for symbolic reasons, however.

SF's gun ban was already overturned by the California Supreme Court on the grounds it violated California law.

[J. J.]

In Phila, the DA refused to prosecute under the new local gun law, and there was an immediate injunction against in enforcement.

[MasterJedi]

The filing was fast, the actual process will take God knows how long.

[NDN]

Certainly should be interesting, if only the court would take the final step to protect every citizen and reverse Roe v. Wade

Please do, it will give the Choice movement a shot in the arm and cause you guys to lose in a landslide. Thanks.

[J. J.]

Certainly should be interesting, if only the court would take the final step to protect every citizen and reverse Roe v. Wade

Please do, it will give the Choice movement a shot in the arm and cause you guys to lose in a landslide. Thanks.

Interestingly, I see this as quite parallel to choice.

Even people that strongly support gun ownership, except for absolute extremists, would argue that mentally incompetent people, criminals and small children shouldn't own guns.  In other words some restrictions.

Many even pro-choice people would argue that there should be some limitations on abortion.  In other words some restrictions.

[Flying Dog]

Certainly should be interesting, if only the court would take the final step to protect every citizen and reverse Roe v. Wade

Please do, it will give the Choice movement a shot in the arm and cause you guys to lose in a landslide. Thanks.

Interestingly, I see this as quite parallel to choice.

Even people that strongly support gun ownership, except for absolute extremists, would argue that mentally incompetent people, criminals and small children shouldn't own guns.  In other words some restrictions.

Many even pro-choice people would argue that there should be some limitations on abortion.  In other words some restrictions.

Yeah well states like Louisiana have trigger laws that would go into effect if Roe V. Wade was ever overturned. I'm sure many pro-choice people that approve of these "limitations" wouldn't approve of a law that would only make an exception when the life of the woman is at risk. No exceptions would be made for cases of rape or incest.

[??????????]

Yeah! If there's one thing the city streets need more of, it's more guns!!

DC is the murder capitol of the USA. Yay! The gun ban worked!

[Jacobtm]

Yeah! If there's one thing the city streets need more of, it's more guns!!

Police cannot be everywhere all the time. If you live in a dangerous neighborhood, your only chance for self-defense is yourself.