1980 Presidential Election
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 03:30:09 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  1980 Presidential Election
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Would you consider the 1980 Presidential Election to be a landslide?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 19

Author Topic: 1980 Presidential Election  (Read 1832 times)
Robespierre's Jaw
Senator Conor Flynn
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,129
Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: -8.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: July 02, 2008, 05:22:27 PM »

Would you consider the 1980 Presidential Election to be a landslide?

Sure the 1980 Presidential Election might have been a landslide of epic proportions for the Reagan/Bush ticket electorally speaking, but if you think about it more than half the country was decided by less than 1-2 percent of the vote. And Ronald Reagan managed to win half the country, or should I say a vast majority of the country with the exceptions of Minnesota, Rhode Island, Georgia, District of Columbia, West Virginia and Maryland.
Logged
CPT MikeyMike
mikeymike
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,513
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.58, S: -3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: July 02, 2008, 07:55:46 PM »
« Edited: July 02, 2008, 07:58:59 PM by CPT MikeyMike »

On election night 1980, there was a CBS Analyst (I forget the name right now) that best summed it up: Reagan's popular vote was wide but not deep. However, Reagan beat Carter by nearly 10% of the popular vote and won 489 electoral votes. The election was an embarrassment for the incumbent so yes, I think it was a landslide.

Here is the clip link I talked about - at 1:46 begins the "wide but not deep" comment. I disagree that 60% is the benchmark for a landslide.
Logged
MasterJedi
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,643
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: July 02, 2008, 09:20:33 PM »

More or less yes.
Logged
Kaine for Senate '18
benconstine
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,329
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: July 02, 2008, 09:21:48 PM »

Yes, since Carter was an incumbent.  Losing by 10%, and getting only 49 EV makes it a landslide for Reagan.
Logged
Iosif is a COTHO
Mango
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 470
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.19, S: -5.04

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: July 02, 2008, 09:44:22 PM »

He won 10 states by less than 3 points...
Logged
go85bucks10
Rookie
**
Posts: 31
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.84, S: -1.04

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: July 16, 2008, 12:30:51 AM »

It was a landslide. Look at the math; is there really and argument that it wasn't?
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: July 16, 2008, 12:44:45 AM »

It was a landslide basically because of the raw vote margin of Reagan over Carter, the breadth of the victory, and the general Republican gains in the House and Senate.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.216 seconds with 14 queries.