|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Keystone Phil
YaBB God
    
Posts: 49369


|
 |
« Reply #10 on: July 19, 2008, 05:33:44 pm » |
|
I'd still put PA-6 at least on the horizon. If we had our act together there with Mike Gerber or Andy Dinniman, the seat would be a pure Tossup, if not lean Dem.
Dinniman - Sure. Toss up/lean Dem Gerber - Don't be so sure about that. PA 6 is basically done for you guys. Gerlach has weathered every major storm. Giving him a joke opponent in 2008 seals the deal. But running Dinniman would likely cost Democrats his Senate seat. Absolutely but what do you care? I wonder how much the state Dems would care anyway. They're at such a disadvantage in that chamber anyway.
|
| Logged |
 And you're a fucking asshole. How about you try actually contributing something to a debate at some point, or are you too busy kissing Rick Santorum's ass?
|
|
|
Mr.Phips
YaBB God
    
Posts: 4813


|
 |
« Reply #11 on: July 19, 2008, 05:40:45 pm » |
|
I'd still put PA-6 at least on the horizon. If we had our act together there with Mike Gerber or Andy Dinniman, the seat would be a pure Tossup, if not lean Dem.
Dinniman - Sure. Toss up/lean Dem Gerber - Don't be so sure about that. PA 6 is basically done for you guys. Gerlach has weathered every major storm. Giving him a joke opponent in 2008 seals the deal. But running Dinniman would likely cost Democrats his Senate seat. Absolutely but what do you care? I wonder how much the state Dems would care anyway. They're at such a disadvantage in that chamber anyway. They cannot afford to be losing seats in the Senate when they are already down 21-29.
|
| Logged |
|
|
|
Keystone Phil
YaBB God
    
Posts: 49369


|
 |
« Reply #12 on: July 19, 2008, 05:42:17 pm » |
|
I'd still put PA-6 at least on the horizon. If we had our act together there with Mike Gerber or Andy Dinniman, the seat would be a pure Tossup, if not lean Dem.
Dinniman - Sure. Toss up/lean Dem Gerber - Don't be so sure about that. PA 6 is basically done for you guys. Gerlach has weathered every major storm. Giving him a joke opponent in 2008 seals the deal. But running Dinniman would likely cost Democrats his Senate seat. Absolutely but what do you care? I wonder how much the state Dems would care anyway. They're at such a disadvantage in that chamber anyway. They cannot afford to be losing seats in the Senate when they are already down 21-29. It's only a matter of time before they lose that one (and others) anyway.
|
| Logged |
 And you're a fucking asshole. How about you try actually contributing something to a debate at some point, or are you too busy kissing Rick Santorum's ass?
|
|
|
Mr.Phips
YaBB God
    
Posts: 4813


|
 |
« Reply #13 on: July 19, 2008, 05:43:10 pm » |
|
I'd still put PA-6 at least on the horizon. If we had our act together there with Mike Gerber or Andy Dinniman, the seat would be a pure Tossup, if not lean Dem.
Dinniman - Sure. Toss up/lean Dem Gerber - Don't be so sure about that. PA 6 is basically done for you guys. Gerlach has weathered every major storm. Giving him a joke opponent in 2008 seals the deal. But running Dinniman would likely cost Democrats his Senate seat. Absolutely but what do you care? I wonder how much the state Dems would care anyway. They're at such a disadvantage in that chamber anyway. They cannot afford to be losing seats in the Senate when they are already down 21-29. It's only a matter of time before they lose that one (and others) anyway. I dont think they could possibly go any lower. Especially considering all of the Dem leaning districts Republicans hold in the Philly suburbs.
|
| Logged |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Keystone Phil
YaBB God
    
Posts: 49369


|
 |
« Reply #23 on: July 19, 2008, 06:24:04 pm » |
|
Where were and are these seats? Which counties?
Veon (lost in 2006) - 14th district - Beaver county DeWeese - 50th district - Fayette, Greene and Washington counties Are Democrats likely to get back the 14th in a Presidential year or did they fumble this one as well? That's the one I referenced in my post responding to Al. Everyone believed that Marshall would be gone after one term; that the voters just wanted to be rid of Veon and would wait two years for another Democrat. I don't know the state of Marshall's race though. I'll try to find out. DeWeese is going to lose if he stays around until November. There are calls for his resignation as leader. If he did that, I bet he'd just leave the House as well. If he sticks around, I don't see how he wins. DeWeese was unopposed in his primary and still had to spend hundreds of thousands. Why? He needed to win back the confidence of Democrats. It didn't work that well. 25% of Democrats wrote in his GOP opponent (the same guy from 2006) against DeWeese.
|
| Logged |
 And you're a fucking asshole. How about you try actually contributing something to a debate at some point, or are you too busy kissing Rick Santorum's ass?
|
|
|
Mr.Phips
YaBB God
    
Posts: 4813


|
 |
« Reply #24 on: July 19, 2008, 06:26:58 pm » |
|
Where were and are these seats? Which counties?
Veon (lost in 2006) - 14th district - Beaver county DeWeese - 50th district - Fayette, Greene and Washington counties Are Democrats likely to get back the 14th in a Presidential year or did they fumble this one as well? That's the one I referenced in my post responding to Al. Everyone believed that Marshall would be gone after one term; that the voters just wanted to be rid of Veon and would wait two years for another Democrat. I don't know the state of Marshall's race though. I'll try to find out. DeWeese is going to lose if he stays around until November. There are calls for his resignation as leader. If he did that, I bet he'd just leave the House as well. If he sticks around, I don't see how he wins. DeWeese was unopposed in his primary and still had to spend hundreds of thousands. Why? He needed to win back the confidence of Democrats. It didn't work that well. 25% of Democrats wrote in his GOP opponent (the same guy from 2006) against DeWeese. It looks as if the voter registration in that district is so Democratic that DeWeese could lose 25% of Dems and still win, but its unlikely.
|
| Logged |
|
|
|