MO-06/Survey USA: Sam Graves' lead over Kay Barnes shrinks
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 08:40:14 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2008 Elections
  2008 Senatorial Election Polls
  MO-06/Survey USA: Sam Graves' lead over Kay Barnes shrinks
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: MO-06/Survey USA: Sam Graves' lead over Kay Barnes shrinks  (Read 954 times)
JohnnyLongtorso
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,798


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: August 02, 2008, 11:55:19 AM »

http://www.surveyusa.com/client/PollReport.aspx?g=67f667c9-27da-4620-bc29-084aa2e7f422

Sam Graves (R) - 48
Kay Barnes (D) - 44

Previous poll (from, I believe, May?) had Graves up by 49-39. Perhaps this will end up being more competitive than MO-09 after all (pending the primary next week).
Logged
MarkWarner08
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,812


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: August 02, 2008, 01:12:00 PM »

This race won't be settled by a dearth of resources on either side. If the district had a greater take of the KC area (and not its more conservative suburbs), Barnes might be leading right now. I tend to be pessimistic about Democrats' chances of reclaiming rural seats like this that they lost in the early 2000s.

Like most in most other close House races, up-ballot conditions could determine the outcome.
Logged
Mr.Phips
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,546


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: August 02, 2008, 02:27:21 PM »

This race won't be settled by a dearth of resources on either side. If the district had a greater take of the KC area (and not its more conservative suburbs), Barnes might be leading right now. I tend to be pessimistic about Democrats' chances of reclaiming rural seats like this that they lost in the early 2000s.

Like most in most other close House races, up-ballot conditions could determine the outcome.

Jay Nixon is likely to win this district in the governor's race, but McCain will likely win it for President unless Obama carries the state. 
Logged
MarkWarner08
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,812


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: August 02, 2008, 02:28:11 PM »

This race won't be settled by a dearth of resources on either side. If the district had a greater take of the KC area (and not its more conservative suburbs), Barnes might be leading right now. I tend to be pessimistic about Democrats' chances of reclaiming rural seats like this that they lost in the early 2000s.

Like most in most other close House races, up-ballot conditions could determine the outcome.

Jay Nixon is likely to win this district in the governor's race, but McCain will likely win it for President unless Obama carries the state. 
Did Bob Holden carry it in 2000?
Logged
Mr.Phips
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,546


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: August 02, 2008, 03:15:15 PM »

This race won't be settled by a dearth of resources on either side. If the district had a greater take of the KC area (and not its more conservative suburbs), Barnes might be leading right now. I tend to be pessimistic about Democrats' chances of reclaiming rural seats like this that they lost in the early 2000s.

Like most in most other close House races, up-ballot conditions could determine the outcome.

Jay Nixon is likely to win this district in the governor's race, but McCain will likely win it for President unless Obama carries the state. 
Did Bob Holden carry it in 2000?

I think he lost it by less than 1000 votes. 
Logged
Flying Dog
Jtfdem
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,404
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: August 02, 2008, 03:22:07 PM »

Graves is trying to paint Barnes as a San Francisco type liberal. Seems it's not working.
Logged
MarkWarner08
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,812


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: August 02, 2008, 06:20:21 PM »

This race won't be settled by a dearth of resources on either side. If the district had a greater take of the KC area (and not its more conservative suburbs), Barnes might be leading right now. I tend to be pessimistic about Democrats' chances of reclaiming rural seats like this that they lost in the early 2000s.

Like most in most other close House races, up-ballot conditions could determine the outcome.

Jay Nixon is likely to win this district in the governor's race, but McCain will likely win it for President unless Obama carries the state. 
Did Bob Holden carry it in 2000?

I think he lost it by less than 1000 votes. 
Thanks. If Holden only narrowly lost MO-06, that bodes well for Nixon's chances.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.218 seconds with 14 queries.