What will be the closest state this year, part II
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 18, 2024, 02:15:38 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2008 Elections
  2008 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
  What will be the closest state this year, part II
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Poll
Question: ...
#1
New Hampshire
 
#2
Pennsylvania
 
#3
New Jersey
 
#4
Virginia
 
#5
North Carolina
 
#6
Florida
 
#7
Missouri
 
#8
Michigan
 
#9
Ohio
 
#10
Indiana
 
#11
Montana
 
#12
Colorado
 
#13
New Mexico
 
#14
Nevada
 
#15
Alaska
 
#16
Other (please specify)
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 54

Author Topic: What will be the closest state this year, part II  (Read 5958 times)
Kaine for Senate '18
benconstine
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,329
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: August 17, 2008, 10:01:28 PM »

Nevada was our last winner; at the moment, I'm saying Virginia.
Logged
nini2287
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,616


Political Matrix
E: 2.77, S: -3.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: August 17, 2008, 10:13:31 PM »

Gotta say Virginia--it seems like it'll go right down to the wire.  New Mexico may be determined by less votes though.
Logged
Kaine for Senate '18
benconstine
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,329
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: August 17, 2008, 11:17:34 PM »

Gotta say Virginia--it seems like it'll go right down to the wire.  New Mexico may be determined by less votes though.

Perhaps, but Virginia will have the closest % margin.
Logged
Ronnie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,993
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: August 17, 2008, 11:22:16 PM »
« Edited: August 17, 2008, 11:30:08 PM by Ronnie »

I'm gonna be optimistic and say Colorado, I expect the difference to be <1%.

I think Virginia will go to McCain by ~1.5%, unless there are crazy high black turnout rates or Obama wins nationally by 4+ points.
Logged
Associate Justice PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,166
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: August 18, 2008, 12:39:20 AM »

     Again, I say Missouri. Still, why do we get a new edition of the thread so soon? I doubt that much will change in such a short period of time.
Logged
Ronnie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,993
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: August 18, 2008, 01:40:56 AM »
« Edited: August 18, 2008, 01:43:01 AM by Ronnie »

     Again, I say Missouri. Still, why do we get a new edition of the thread so soon? I doubt that much will change in such a short period of time.

You'd have to be awfully pessimistic to say MO will be the closest state.  What makes you think that Obama can make up for the massacres in rural MO?  Slightly higher black turnout rates in St. Louis and Kansas City won't cut it.
Logged
Associate Justice PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,166
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: August 18, 2008, 02:12:42 AM »

     Again, I say Missouri. Still, why do we get a new edition of the thread so soon? I doubt that much will change in such a short period of time.

You'd have to be awfully pessimistic to say MO will be the closest state.  What makes you think that Obama can make up for the massacres in rural MO?  Slightly higher black turnout rates in St. Louis and Kansas City won't cut it.

     Ever since we were massacred in 2006, I've tried being unrealistically pessimistic. That way, I'll be pleased by any outcome. Smiley

     To answer your question though, I'm not sure he'll be massacred that badly. Reagan was struggling in the polls through most of 1980 because he was viewed as a far-right ideologue. He only opened up a huge lead towards the end after he smoked Carter in the debate. Obama's not that good of a debater, but he's very charismatic. I strongly fear something similar will happen with him.
Logged
Јas
Jas
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,705
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: August 18, 2008, 05:53:47 AM »

The 2 most important states (IMO) may well be the closest: Ohio and Colorado.

I'm sticking with Ohio for this poll.
Logged
Kaine for Senate '18
benconstine
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,329
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: August 18, 2008, 10:12:22 AM »

     Again, I say Missouri. Still, why do we get a new edition of the thread so soon? I doubt that much will change in such a short period of time.

The last one had been running since May.
Logged
Grumpier Than Uncle Joe
GM3PRP
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,080
Greece
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: August 18, 2008, 10:26:21 AM »

VA & OH.....but I voted VA.
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: August 18, 2008, 03:15:58 PM »

I'm going to be a contrarian and say MI.
Logged
elcorazon
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,402


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: August 18, 2008, 03:34:56 PM »

I voted Virginia, which when decoded means I think the election will be close but Obama will probably pull it out.  NV is a similar one.  OH is probably the best vote if one truly feels it's a tossup.

J.J.'s pick means that McCain will win, probably quite easily actually.

Most people seem to be voting based on the assumption the race will be quite close.

If Obama were to win by, say 5%, which is not really a tremendous win at all, the answer could be NC or SD or MT or IN or something.  If McCain were to win by a similar margin, it could be PA, WI, MI, MN, OR... or some other state many may not feel is all that close right now.

Logged
Associate Justice PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,166
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: August 18, 2008, 04:11:31 PM »

     Again, I say Missouri. Still, why do we get a new edition of the thread so soon? I doubt that much will change in such a short period of time.

The last one had been running since May.

     I hadn't noticed. That makes sense, though.
Logged
Kaine for Senate '18
benconstine
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,329
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: August 18, 2008, 04:17:05 PM »

     Again, I say Missouri. Still, why do we get a new edition of the thread so soon? I doubt that much will change in such a short period of time.

The last one had been running since May.

     I hadn't noticed. That makes sense, though.

Yup.
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: August 18, 2008, 05:46:28 PM »



J.J.'s pick means that McCain will win, probably quite easily actually.




No I don't. 

I can very easily see McCain winning OH, but losing some states Bush carried in 2000. 
Logged
bullmoose88
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,515


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: August 18, 2008, 05:49:35 PM »



J.J.'s pick means that McCain will win, probably quite easily actually.




No I don't. 

I can very easily see McCain winning OH, but losing some states Bush carried in 2000. 

I mean, I could see it too...(McCain falling big in the West, Virginia...etc)...but my question is...how often does a candidate win a state that the predecessor from his party failed to win in a closer election?
Logged
War on Want
Evilmexicandictator
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,643
Uzbekistan


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -8.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: August 18, 2008, 05:52:24 PM »

Nevada
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: August 18, 2008, 06:09:12 PM »



J.J.'s pick means that McCain will win, probably quite easily actually.




No I don't. 

I can very easily see McCain winning OH, but losing some states Bush carried in 2000. 

I mean, I could see it too...(McCain falling big in the West, Virginia...etc)...but my question is...how often does a candidate win a state that the predecessor from his party failed to win in a closer election?

I could see several realistic possibilities:

Obama takes NH and CO



Obama takes VA



This is not a McCain sweep situation.

Obama/Bayh takes IN.
Logged
elcorazon
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,402


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: August 20, 2008, 09:52:44 AM »
« Edited: August 20, 2008, 09:55:06 AM by elcorazon »



J.J.'s pick means that McCain will win, probably quite easily actually.




No I don't. 

I can very easily see McCain winning OH, but losing some states Bush carried in 2000. 
you picked Michigan, not Ohio.  If Michigan is the closest state, McCain will win the election.  I am not suggesting that is YOUR opinion.  I'm stating MY opinion.  You could disagree but I doubt if you are picking Michigan to be the closest state that you think say, North Carolina will be a nailbiter, or even Virginia.

EDIT:  I guess I just personally doubt mccain can compete in MI and NOT carry CO, VA, OH, etc.
Logged
DownWithTheLeft
downwithdaleft
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,548
Italy


Political Matrix
E: 9.16, S: -3.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: August 20, 2008, 09:54:53 AM »

I say PA, MI, and OH are all decided by <1%

VA goes McCain by 3-5%, NV and CO decided by less than 2%
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: August 20, 2008, 10:10:09 AM »



J.J.'s pick means that McCain will win, probably quite easily actually.




No I don't. 

I can very easily see McCain winning OH, but losing some states Bush carried in 2000. 
you picked Michigan, not Ohio.  If Michigan is the closest state, McCain will win the election.  I am not suggesting that is YOUR opinion.  I'm stating MY opinion.  You could disagree but I doubt if you are picking Michigan to be the closest state that you think say, North Carolina will be a nailbiter, or even Virginia.

EDIT:  I guess I just personally doubt mccain can compete in MI and NOT carry CO, VA, OH, etc.

I think OH is a bit more solid for McCain than everybody thinks, but I can very easily see him winning MI while losing VA and CO.
Logged
Kaine for Senate '18
benconstine
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,329
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: August 28, 2008, 11:44:29 AM »

Bump.
Logged
exopolitician
MATCHU[D]
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,892
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.03, S: -6.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: August 28, 2008, 11:45:30 AM »

Colorado or Virginia.
Logged
Kaine for Senate '18
benconstine
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,329
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: August 30, 2008, 12:34:56 PM »

Palin probably takes Alaska off the list.
Logged
Punditty
Rookie
**
Posts: 72


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: August 31, 2008, 03:18:00 PM »

Florida. But unlike 2000, the fate of the nation won't be hanging in the balance as we await the results.


Punditty
http://www.allvoices.com/users/Punditty
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.049 seconds with 17 queries.