By 2100 how many nations will there be?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 06:21:05 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  International General Discussion (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  By 2100 how many nations will there be?
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3]
Author Topic: By 2100 how many nations will there be?  (Read 15716 times)
MasterJedi
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,643
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #50 on: August 21, 2006, 08:09:48 AM »


But you want to be alive when the US of A grandly annex Canada! Grin
Logged
MODU
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,023
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #51 on: August 21, 2006, 08:26:38 AM »


But you want to be alive when the US of A grandly annex Canada! Grin

I say we take both Canada and Mexico, and become the "United States of North America."  Tongue
Logged
Colin
ColinW
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,684
Papua New Guinea


Political Matrix
E: 3.87, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #52 on: August 21, 2006, 10:38:04 AM »


But you want to be alive when the US of A grandly annex Canada! Grin

I say we take both Canada and Mexico, and become the "United States of North America."  Tongue

Why change the name? America, North America same thing.
Logged
MODU
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,023
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #53 on: August 21, 2006, 10:51:48 AM »


But you want to be alive when the US of A grandly annex Canada! Grin

I say we take both Canada and Mexico, and become the "United States of North America."  Tongue

Why change the name? America, North America same thing.

Just so we don't piss off the United States of South America, and cause a major war, putting the United States of Central America in the cross fire.  Tongue
Logged
MasterJedi
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,643
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #54 on: August 21, 2006, 11:06:43 AM »


But you want to be alive when the US of A grandly annex Canada! Grin

I say we take both Canada and Mexico, and become the "United States of North America."  Tongue

Why change the name? America, North America same thing.

Just so we don't piss off the United States of South America, and cause a major war, putting the United States of Central America in the cross fire.  Tongue

Or we could just take everything in North and South America and then we really will be the United States of America. Grin
Logged
MODU
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,023
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #55 on: August 21, 2006, 11:13:20 AM »


But you want to be alive when the US of A grandly annex Canada! Grin

I say we take both Canada and Mexico, and become the "United States of North America."  Tongue

Why change the name? America, North America same thing.

Just so we don't piss off the United States of South America, and cause a major war, putting the United States of Central America in the cross fire.  Tongue

Or we could just take everything in North and South America and then we really will be the United States of America. Grin

Could you imagine the logistical nightmare (let alone the political one) of trying to manage a nation that large?
Logged
Platypus
hughento
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,478
Australia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #56 on: August 25, 2006, 06:32:14 PM »

...plus you'd have to offlaod Hawai'i.

The ¨Commonwealth of Australasia¨ would be happy to take it, i'm sure.
Logged
Brutus
Rookie
**
Posts: 72


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #57 on: September 21, 2006, 03:51:36 PM »

300?  It's folly to predict the number, but I will say that I believe the trend will be towards a greater, rather than smaller, number of countries.  The balkanization of the world during the post-cold war years has further to go.
Logged
Undisguised Sockpuppet
Straha
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,787
Uruguay


Political Matrix
E: 6.52, S: 2.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #58 on: September 21, 2006, 04:02:32 PM »

2100 is a bit far away, but the current trend is towards ever more, ever smaller, ever less powerful nations and ever fewer (er...no, probably not that one), ever larger, ever more powerful private corporations, and that'll continue for quite a while.
Increased cooperation between nations, regionally à la EU or worldwide à la UNO, will be the most powerful force against that, but won't mean actual fusing of nations, desirable as that may be.

Nothing much to add.

Oh, yeah, except: Given the massive economic and cultural problems (and political cleavages) created by every country merger these past hundred years or so, I think I'll lay off  the "desirable as that may be" part.
Why? Giving the africans and aisans their independence didn't work. Look at africa today.
Logged
AN Y
Domenixos
Newbie
*
Posts: 12


Political Matrix
E: 1.74, S: -4.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #59 on: September 21, 2006, 06:24:25 PM »

By then, every man will live in a Republic of Himself.

And every woman will live in a Republic of Herself, of course.
Logged
Platypus
hughento
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,478
Australia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #60 on: September 22, 2006, 02:41:46 AM »

2100 is a bit far away, but the current trend is towards ever more, ever smaller, ever less powerful nations and ever fewer (er...no, probably not that one), ever larger, ever more powerful private corporations, and that'll continue for quite a while.
Increased cooperation between nations, regionally à la EU or worldwide à la UNO, will be the most powerful force against that, but won't mean actual fusing of nations, desirable as that may be.

Nothing much to add.

Oh, yeah, except: Given the massive economic and cultural problems (and political cleavages) created by every country merger these past hundred years or so, I think I'll lay off  the "desirable as that may be" part.
Why? Giving the africans and aisans their independence didn't work. Look at africa today.

..and then look at the culture borders.

It has to be done properly...Iraq doesn't really work, but Jordan does...why? cultural boundaries.
Logged
Undisguised Sockpuppet
Straha
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,787
Uruguay


Political Matrix
E: 6.52, S: 2.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #61 on: March 18, 2007, 04:23:59 PM »



for those who can't see it

http://img385.imageshack.us/img385/3199/thefuturelv1.png
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.034 seconds with 12 queries.