Rasmussen State Polls 9/10

[Rowan]

ND
McCain 55%
Obama 41%

AK
McCain 64%
Obama 33%

NM
McCain 49%
Obama 47%

Polls were released early to premium members.

[Keystone Phil]

ND
McCain 55%
Obama 41%

Close race.

[Fmr. Pres. Duke]

LOL

Obama needs to run more ads in North Dakota.

[Sbane]

NM is a bit scary. Phil and duke stfu about ND. Who has suggested obama had a good chance of winning it? And considering Mccain's bounce and the solidification of the republican base, these numbers seem about right.

[Keystone Phil]

Phil and duke stfu about ND. Who has suggested obama had a good chance of winning it?

LOL

You are quickly becoming one of the most irritatingly hackish posters on the forum.

[Sbane]

Phil and duke stfu about ND. Who has suggested obama had a good chance of winning it?

LOL

You are quickly becoming one of the most irritatingly hackish posters on the forum.

You didn't answer my question.

[elcorazon]

Phil and duke stfu about ND. Who has suggested obama had a good chance of winning it?

LOL

You are quickly becoming one of the most irritatingly hackish posters on the forum.

PKB

[Aizen]

Alaska - Expected thanks to Palin. Now McCain will easily clear 60% here
ND - Welcome back to irrelevancy
New Mexico - Disheartening. If we lose Ohio, NM is must-have along with Iowa and Colorado.

[Swing low, sweet chariot. Comin' for to carry me home.]

why are they polling AK?

NM is interesting, but the shift in ND makes me want to see Minn and Wisc polled by a couple of firms.

[Keystone Phil]

Phil and duke stfu about ND. Who has suggested obama had a good chance of winning it?

LOL

You are quickly becoming one of the most irritatingly hackish posters on the forum.

You didn't answer my question.

Do you really want me to bump the thread in which eight forum members said that it is a toss up state?

Phil and duke stfu about ND. Who has suggested obama had a good chance of winning it?

LOL

You are quickly becoming one of the most irritatingly hackish posters on the forum.

PKB

You would know better than anyone else, I guess.

[Rowan]

why are they polling AK?
 

Because some people here thought it was a tossup.

[© tweed]

why are they polling AK?

competitive Senate race, mostly.

Ras makes some of its billing on polling states no other major firms do, too.  it's part of his allure.

[Sbane]

Phil and duke stfu about ND. Who has suggested obama had a good chance of winning it?

LOL

You are quickly becoming one of the most irritatingly hackish posters on the forum.

You didn't answer my question.

Do you really want me to bump the thread in which eight forum members said that it is a toss up state?

Please do. I hope it isn't from months ago.

[Brittain33]

Please do. I hope it isn't from months ago.

It must have been one of those anonymous polls where anyone can vote how they like.

[Keystone Phil]

Phil and duke stfu about ND. Who has suggested obama had a good chance of winning it?

LOL

You are quickly becoming one of the most irritatingly hackish posters on the forum.

You didn't answer my question.

Do you really want me to bump the thread in which eight forum members said that it is a toss up state?

Please do. I hope it isn't from months ago.

Wait...what does that matter if it's from months ago or not? You asked if anyone was saying that Obama has a chance. They did. Now you have proof against your belief and you want to put a time limit on it? Nice try.

Please do. I hope it isn't from months ago.

It must have been one of those anonymous polls where anyone can vote how they like.

...

Those polls are always like that. What does that have to do with anything?

[Sbane]

A few months ago polls were about tied in ND so people said it was a possible tossup. Now they are not so I hope nobody is still saying it is one. That's the fun of predictions phil, hoping that something incredible happens. When Obama supporters saw polls that were close in a state like North dakota, they were obviously more than a little happy. You would be the same if you saw a poll with NY or CA tied.

[KeyKeeper]

Yay, these are great numbers for Sen. McCain.

[Brittain33]

Those polls are always like that. What does that have to do with anything?

If you're going to cite people for holding an extreme opinion, it should be someone identifiable. Not when we have Walter Mitty and others who can say OMGZ SAFE OBAMA!! whenever something like that comes up.

[elcorazon]

the last time we had a "battleground state" thread, 2 of the dozens of respondents listed ND as one of the battlegrounds.  Neither was an "Obama hack". One was a Republican and the other was Gustaf, who is definitely not a big time Obama guy, if I remember correctly.

curious to see the thread you're discussing, phil.

[Keystone Phil]

A few months ago polls were about tied in ND so people said it was a possible tossup. Now they are not so I hope nobody is still saying it is one. That's the fun of predictions phil, hoping that something incredible happens. When Obama supporters saw polls that were close in a state like North dakota, they were obviously more than a little happy. You would be the same if you saw a poll with NY or CA tied.

Wow. What an absolutely sad excuse.

I guess I can back up all of my wrong predictions with "Well, that's the fun of predictions - hoping that it happens!" That's not a prediction.

I would not act the same way with NY or CA because I know we have about a 5% chance in those states. Don't tell me what I'd do. Hell, I've been dismissing the idea of McCain taking New Hampshire.

Those polls are always like that. What does that have to do with anything?

If you're going to cite people for holding an extreme opinion, it should be someone identifiable. Not when we have Walter Mitty and others who can say OMGZ SAFE OBAMA!! whenever something like that comes up.

All eight votes weren't Walter.

[Sbane]

A few months ago polls were about tied in ND so people said it was a possible tossup. Now they are not so I hope nobody is still saying it is one. That's the fun of predictions phil, hoping that something incredible happens. When Obama supporters saw polls that were close in a state like North dakota, they were obviously more than a little happy. You would be the same if you saw a poll with NY or CA tied.

Wow. What an absolutely sad excuse.

I guess I can back up all of my wrong predictions with "Well, that's the fun of predictions - hoping that it happens!" That's not a prediction.

I would not act the same way with NY or CA because I know we have about a 5% chance in those states. Don't tell me what I'd do. Hell, I've been dismissing the idea of McCain taking New Hampshire.

Well can we see that thread or what? And even if you wouldn't have said NY or CA were a tossup, guess what 8 other people would have.

[Keystone Phil]

curious to see the thread you're discussing, phil.

https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=77572.0

Eight votes saying that it is a toss up state.

Before someone tells me that there are over forty votes saying that it is not a swing state, that doesn't mean that the eight votes are irrelevant.

[Sbane]

curious to see the thread you're discussing, phil.

https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=77572.0

Eight votes saying that it is a toss up state.

Before someone tells me that there are over forty votes saying that it is not a swing state, that doesn't mean that the eight votes are irrelevant.

WOW this is the best you could do? Even BRTD said it wasn't a swing state. You're delusional man.

[Keystone Phil]

curious to see the thread you're discussing, phil.

https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=77572.0

Eight votes saying that it is a toss up state.

Before someone tells me that there are over forty votes saying that it is not a swing state, that doesn't mean that the eight votes are irrelevant.

WOW this is the best you could do? Even BRTD said it wasn't a swing state. You're delusional man.

So what are you refuting here? BRTD said it wasn't a swing state so the other eight votes don't count?

Change your avatar to assclown, please.

[Sbane]

curious to see the thread you're discussing, phil.

https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=77572.0

Eight votes saying that it is a toss up state.

Before someone tells me that there are over forty votes saying that it is not a swing state, that doesn't mean that the eight votes are irrelevant.

WOW this is the best you could do? Even BRTD said it wasn't a swing state. You're delusional man.

So what are you refuting here? BRTD said it wasn't a swing state so the other eight votes don't count?

How the hell is this significant? One Obama supporter said in the whole thread that it was a tosup. One. 6 pages of discussion and just one said tossup. And as for those 8 I am sure 2 of those are Duke and Walter. There are probably some other jokers around too. About 84% said no. Like I said you are f'in delusional.