Erc
Junior Chimp
Posts: 5,823
|
|
« Reply #1 on: September 16, 2008, 11:24:33 PM » |
|
Generally, since the 23rd Amendment, such a condition would require the Democrat to win around 51.5% of the two-way vote in order to win a majority of the states [ranging from a low of 50.2% in 1976 to a high of 52.1% in 2000, ignoring 1968]. A nice bias to the Republicans, though not massive. (Though, if it were in place, it would all but guarantee a McCain victory this year).
"Tipping Point" states for a 26-state majority:
2004: Florida. Kerry would have needed 51.3% of the two-way vote to win here (he won 48.6%).
2000: Nevada. Gore needed 52.1% nationwide (he won 50.3%)
1996: Ohio. Clinton needed 51.1% nationwide (he won 54.7%)
1992: Tennessee. Clinton needed 50.9% nationwide (he won 53.5%)
1988: Maine. Dukakis needed 51.9% (he won 46.1%)
1984: Connecticut. Mondale needed 51.8% (he won 40.8%)
1980: Oregon. Carter needed 50.2% (he won 44.7%)
1976: Maine. Carter needed 51.4% (he won 51.1%)--barely losing the count here, Maine and Oregon making the difference here.
1972: Vermont. McGovern needed 51.4% (he won 38.2%).
1968: Complicated, due to Wallace... To Prevent a Nixon Majority: Wisconsin. Humphrey needed 51.6% of the two-way vote nationwide to win here, but only won 49.6%.
To Win an outright Majority: Nevada. Humphrey needed 54.3% (he only won 49.6%).
1964: Delaware. Johnson needed 50.2% of the two-way vote nationwide (he won 61.3%).
|