I'm sorry it's "tiring" for you.
In 2000, Bush won Mo by 3, tied nationally.
In 2004, Bush up 2 there, yet up nationally by 5.
That is a bit surprising. So what?
Easy agcat.....my fatigue was not directed at you
Besides, all those numbers you cite ARE within the MOE
But back to SUSA - I'm not specifically defending them ...but.....those numbers for MO are about where they were pre RNC. As for accuracy of SUSA........
NH SUSA Actual
Kerry 33 38
Dean 28 26
Edwards 14 12
Clark 12 12
Lieberman 7 8
Oklahoma
Clark 29 30
Edwards 27 29
Kerry 26 27
Dean 7 4
MO
Kerry 44 50
Edwards 20 24
Dean 15 8
Clark 6 4
TN
Kerry 35 41
Edwards 25 26
Clark 24 23
Dean 9 4
AZ
Kerry 34 42
Clark 28 26
Dean 18 14
Lieberman 7 7
Edwards 7 7
At first glance at Kerry's numbers one might say not real accurate. Yet much of Kerry's higher numbers are the result of the 'piling on' effect once he had won New Hampshire and people were voting for who was obviously going to win. What struck me most about their polling was how accurate they were with the other candidates results. Not bad for primary polls from a firm that 'churns' out the polls.......