Westchester County, NY in 2004: A Work in Progress on the 9/11 Effect
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 10:42:49 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Westchester County, NY in 2004: A Work in Progress on the 9/11 Effect
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Westchester County, NY in 2004: A Work in Progress on the 9/11 Effect  (Read 3717 times)
Erc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,823
Slovenia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: September 18, 2008, 11:07:43 AM »
« edited: September 18, 2008, 11:24:10 AM by Erc »

Inspired by the thread here, and thanks to cinyc's links to detailed results for Westchester County, I've decided to take a detailed look at the voting habits of Westchester in 2004.

In 2004, Westchester voted 58.07% - 40.33% for Kerry.
In 2000, Westchester voted 58.63% - 37.46% for Gore.

Bush improved on his percentage in Westchester by 2.869%, almost exactly equal to his nationwide increase of 2.864%.  On a whole, 9/11 doesn't seem to have affected the voting habits of Westchester disproportionately compared to the rest of the country...but it should be interesting to take a look at it on a closer basis.

In the following table, the "Swing from 2000" is the increase in the Republican percentage of the vote (looking only at the Republican percent as a way to partially cancel out Nader).  Trend is the increase in the Republican percentage of the vote in comparison to the total Westchester swing of 2.87%.


   Municipality      Total Vote      Kerry      Bush      Swing      Trend   
   Mount Vernon      23026      79.74%      18.09%      1.28%      -1.59%   
   Greenburgh      43291      65.57%      32.93%      2.76%      -0.10%   
   New Castle      9773      65.91%      32.93%      1.03%      -1.84%   
   White Plains      22365      64.79%      33.46%      2.99%      0.12%   
   Scarsdale      9071      65.34%      33.68%      3.84%      0.97%   
   New Rochelle      28362      62.16%      36.27%      6.15%      3.28%   
   Peekskill      7679      61.83%      36.46%      3.19%      0.32%   
   Mamaroneck      14224      62.09%      36.48%      1.27%      -1.60%   
   Ossining      14798      61.25%      37.36%      2.07%      -0.80%   
   Mount Kisco      3999      60.99%      37.41%      2.37%      -0.50%   
   Yonkers      66397      56.68%      41.46%      3.11%      0.24%   
   Pound Ridge      2983      56.08%      42.68%      0.16%      -2.71%   
   Rye (Town)      15644      55.16%      43.24%      4.61%      1.75%   
   Bedford      8285      54.92%      43.55%      -1.71%      -4.58%   
   Cortlandt      19282      54.09%      44.31%      3.94%      1.07%   
   Lewisboro      6964      53.78%      45.09%      0.92%      -1.95%   
   Pelham      6122      51.40%      47.03%      -0.94%      -3.81%   
   North Castle      6394      50.11%      48.42%      2.51%      -0.36%   
   Rye (City)      7673      49.64%      48.99%      -0.96%      -3.82%   
   Mount Pleasant      19001      48.42%      49.93%      2.08%      -0.79%   
   North Salem      2751      47.07%      51.22%      1.06%      -1.81%   
   Yorktown      18306      47.07%      51.43%      5.05%      2.18%   
   Harrison      11648      45.32%      53.02%      5.91%      3.04%   
   Somers      11109      45.07%      53.69%      3.10%      0.23%   
   Eastchester      16671      43.87%      54.65%      1.66%      -1.21%   
   Total      395818      58.07%      40.33%      2.87%      0.00%   

Of interest are the incredibly large swings in either direction:

The largest swings to Bush were in:
New Rochelle (+6.15%)
Harrison (+5.91%)
Yorktown (+5.05%).

Three towns swung against Bush...he did worse here than he did in 2000:
Bedford (-1.71%)
Rye (City) (-0.96%)
Pelham (-0.94%)

I'm not surprised at all by New Rochelle...heavily Italian, just the sort of place you'd expect a swing like that.

What got me started on this project was the swing I already knew about against Bush in my hometown of Pelham---to see whether it was unique or not---and, with a couple of exceptions, it is.  Pelham was one of the five municipalities in Westchester to vote for Bush in 2000, and I believe its vote for Kerry was the first time the town voted Democratic in recorded history.  The place is trending Democratic, certainly (one-party Republican rule [i.e. Democrats didn't even run] in the southern half of town ended around the same time...and if the place voted for Dole in 1996, there's obviously been a considerable shift)...though I can't really explain it myself.

Looking at precinct-level data, it looks like (though I'm not quite certain which precincts line up with which geographic locations) North Pelham [closer to New Rochelle geographically and demographically] had a large swing to Bush, while the rest of the town swung against Bush.
Logged
they don't love you like i love you
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 112,951
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: September 18, 2008, 11:09:38 AM »

I doubt Pelham voted for Goldwater.
Logged
Erc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,823
Slovenia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: September 18, 2008, 11:31:17 AM »
« Edited: September 18, 2008, 11:36:25 AM by Erc »


Probably not (though I wouldn't be surprised if the southern half did)...and Westchester swung against the Republicans far less than, say, upstate did.
Logged
Verily
Cuivienen
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,663


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: September 18, 2008, 12:53:49 PM »

Scarsdale has to be one of the wealthiest municipalities in the country to vote for Kerry, certainly to vote for him that strongly.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Logged
Erc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,823
Slovenia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: September 18, 2008, 05:04:40 PM »
« Edited: September 18, 2008, 05:10:49 PM by Erc »

Scarsdale has to be one of the wealthiest municipalities in the country to vote for Kerry, certainly to vote for him that strongly.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.


It is Scaaahsdale, after all.  When you think of "rich elitist liberals" you think of Scarsdale.
Logged
Erc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,823
Slovenia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: September 18, 2008, 08:44:14 PM »

Considering that the town of 12,000-odd lost around 9 people in the attacks themselves, one would think that any 9/11 effect would be present there.

Bush won Pelham in 2000 by only 30 votes (Nader got 224)...I don't know how each part of the town voted without knowing which precinct is which (though, of course, Pelham Manor should be the more Republican).

All I can say that the precincts that swung to Bush all did vote for Gore in 2000.

My best guesses for the swing, from living there at the time (albeit while in high school)...negative reaction to the war, influx of younger couples into suburbia, general increasing emphasis on social issues?
Logged
Erc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,823
Slovenia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: September 18, 2008, 10:20:44 PM »

My best guesses for the swing, from living there at the time (albeit while in high school)...negative reaction to the war, influx of younger couples into suburbia, general increasing emphasis on social issues?

Really? I'm from Pelham myself. I never went to school there, but my sister does, and she says that the students and teachers are overwhelmingly Republican and pro-war.

Apart from one history teacher who went all insanely patriotic after 9/11, that was never my experience...if anything, I thought the faculty mildly left-leaning.
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,731
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: September 20, 2008, 02:26:35 PM »

Scarsdale has to be one of the wealthiest municipalities in the country to vote for Kerry, certainly to vote for him that strongly.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.


It is Scaaahsdale, after all.  When you think of "rich elitist liberals" you think of Scarsdale.

Yup. Scarsdale is the only place I've seen quite like the rich, heavily D communities we have here.
Logged
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,069
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: September 20, 2008, 11:25:14 PM »
« Edited: September 20, 2008, 11:29:19 PM by Torie »

Scarsdale is heavily Jewish, and has been Dem since rocks cooled. Eastchester, equally rich, is heavily Catholic. That is the rap on this. Rich WASPS in Westchester (an eroding demographic) have to a rather remarkable degree just thought Bush was infra dig.
Logged
Verily
Cuivienen
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,663


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: September 21, 2008, 04:43:09 PM »
« Edited: September 21, 2008, 04:45:51 PM by Verily »

Scarsdale has to be one of the wealthiest municipalities in the country to vote for Kerry, certainly to vote for him that strongly.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.


It is Scaaahsdale, after all.  When you think of "rich elitist liberals" you think of Scarsdale.

True. They weren't always so liberal, though; my mother's family were members of the Scarsdale Golf Club back when it didn't admit Jews. This is especially ironic given the Jewish concentration there now. Of course, she didn't grow up in Scarsdale proper but just over the line in a wealthy neighboring area in Hartsdale (which IIRC is in Greenburgh).
Logged
Jacobtm
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,216


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: October 15, 2008, 07:55:25 AM »

What is your hypothesis here about swing for/against Bush in various Westchester municipalities? It seems like when you control for Bush's increased national margin, that it was simply Republican areas who voted a bit more heavily for Bush.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.056 seconds with 11 queries.