Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
July 28, 2015, 07:36:58 pm
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Election 2016 predictions are now open!.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  General Politics
| |-+  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: True Federalist, Small Business Owner of Any Repute, Badger)
| | |-+  Is this country headed toward another depression?
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 Print
Author Topic: Is this country headed toward another depression?  (Read 3430 times)
Rand Paul 2016
BushOklahoma
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 24500
Kenya


View Profile
« on: September 18, 2008, 07:42:38 pm »
Ignore

I heard this being floated around at work.  With several major financial institutions biting the dust the past week, my co-workers are comparing this to what happened in late 1929 into 1930 at the onset of the Great Depression.  They are tossing around the idea that this is looking eerily similar to the events 78 years ago.  What say you?  I don't necessarily agree with the idea that we're headed to a depression.  One reason is, the American Economy of 2008, while in a recession, is much stronger than the American Economy of 1929-1930.  80 years has made our economy very strong.  Plus, with several "recessions" in those 80 years, those events have made our economy very resilient and we have been able to bounce back nicely from all the recessions we've had in the past 70-80 years.  I want to get your honest, non-partisan, opinion, though.
Logged

My earlier comment notwithstanding, I do think that the site would be better off if Inks left his position. (The fact that the village idiot has dropped in to express his support for him only confirms this.)
Warner for President '16
benconstine
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 30346
United States


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: September 18, 2008, 07:44:52 pm »
Ignore

No; certainly not anything nearly as severe.  We may hit a fairly bad recession, but it won't be nearly as bad as the Depression was.
Logged

Obama High's debate team:

"Now let me be clear...I...I...um...uh...now let me be clear.  I strongly condemn the affirmative in the strongest possible terms, and I am closely monitoring their arguments.  Let me be clear on this."
Keystone Phil
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 52879


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: September 18, 2008, 07:45:18 pm »
Ignore

No
Logged



The entire country is pretty much Republican.
??????????
StatesRights
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 31255
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

View Profile
« Reply #3 on: September 18, 2008, 07:45:46 pm »
Ignore

No and if we did we'd better hope we don't get a president who extends it (like FDR).
Logged
DownWithTheLeft
downwithdaleft
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 18717
Italy


Political Matrix
E: 9.16, S: -3.13

View Profile
« Reply #4 on: September 18, 2008, 07:46:20 pm »
Ignore

No and if we did we'd better hope we don't get a president who extends it (like FDR).
Perhaps that president would end it by declaring an unnecessary war even sooner than FDR did
Logged

Gov. Christopher J. Christie
Snowguy716
snowguy716
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 18300
Austria


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: September 18, 2008, 08:19:46 pm »
Ignore

YES WE'RE ALL DOOMED AND ITS THE RETHUGLICANTS FAULT!!!!!!!!!! LOLZ!!!!
Logged

"Above and beyond the question of how to grow the economy there is a legitimate concern about how to grow the quality of our lives."
-Paul Wellstone


"The message was that you are so well trained to believe what you see... That you believed what you saw."

Minnesota Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party
Daniel Adams
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1434
Georgia


Political Matrix
E: 9.03, S: 2.43

View Profile
« Reply #6 on: September 18, 2008, 08:45:24 pm »
Ignore

Nope, unless we repeat the same mistakes Hoover and FDR committed.
Logged
Duke
AHDuke99
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 20687


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: September 18, 2008, 08:56:57 pm »
Ignore

Obama raising taxes in the middle of this al la FDR is a good way to cause one. We know he's rooting for it right now.
Logged
○∙◄☻tπ[╪AV┼cV└
jfern
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 34066


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: September 18, 2008, 08:59:59 pm »
Ignore

It's looking like the worst since the Great Depression,but there's no evidence that it'd be as bad as the Depression. Bush did screw things up pretty bad, so you never know.
Logged

○∙◄☻tπ[╪AV┼cV└
jfern
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 34066


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: September 18, 2008, 09:00:40 pm »
Ignore

Obama raising taxes in the middle of this al la FDR is a good way to cause one. We know he's rooting for it right now.

Most people would get a tax cut, at least if they still have jobs after the Bush economy.
Logged

Duke
AHDuke99
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 20687


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: September 18, 2008, 09:49:29 pm »
Ignore

Obama raising taxes in the middle of this al la FDR is a good way to cause one. We know he's rooting for it right now.

Most people would get a tax cut, at least if they still have jobs after the Bush economy.

Okay. Let's raise taxes on the wealthy, capital gains, payroll, and social security and see how the economy responds. I bet it would turn around!
Logged
NDN
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3501
Uganda


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: September 18, 2008, 10:06:17 pm »
Ignore

Obama raising taxes in the middle of this al la FDR is a good way to cause one. We know he's rooting for it right now.

Most people would get a tax cut, at least if they still have jobs after the Bush economy.

Okay. Let's raise taxes on the wealthy, capital gains, payroll, and social security and see how the economy responds. I bet it would turn around!
I highly doubt Obama is going to attempt to do all of that at once. That said the immense costs of what he seems to be advocating make me extremely nervous. We have enough unfunded liabilities as it stands without him promising to use government to practically part the seas.
Logged


ABANDON ALL HOPE
CARLHAYDEN
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 10655


Political Matrix
E: 1.38, S: -0.51

View Profile
« Reply #12 on: September 18, 2008, 10:09:23 pm »
Ignore

Depression, probably not.  Severe and lengthy recession, probably.
Logged

Registered in Arizona for Fantasy election purposes.
○∙◄☻tπ[╪AV┼cV└
jfern
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 34066


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: September 18, 2008, 10:10:57 pm »
Ignore

Obama raising taxes in the middle of this al la FDR is a good way to cause one. We know he's rooting for it right now.

Most people would get a tax cut, at least if they still have jobs after the Bush economy.

Okay. Let's raise taxes on the wealthy, capital gains, payroll, and social security and see how the economy responds. I bet it would turn around!
I highly doubt Obama is going to attempt to do all of that at once. That said the immense costs of what he seems to be advocating make me extremely nervous. We have enough unfunded liabilities as it stands without him promising to use government to practically part the seas.

His tax cut is much cheaper than McCain's.
Logged

??????????
StatesRights
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 31255
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

View Profile
« Reply #14 on: September 18, 2008, 10:12:51 pm »
Ignore

Obama raising taxes in the middle of this al la FDR is a good way to cause one. We know he's rooting for it right now.

Most people would get a tax cut, at least if they still have jobs after the Bush economy.

Okay. Let's raise taxes on the wealthy, capital gains, payroll, and social security and see how the economy responds. I bet it would turn around!
I highly doubt Obama is going to attempt to do all of that at once. That said the immense costs of what he seems to be advocating make me extremely nervous. We have enough unfunded liabilities as it stands without him promising to use government to practically part the seas.

His tax cut is much cheaper than McCain's.

How will he pay for his 500 Billion in new spending?
Logged
A18
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 23836
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

View Profile
« Reply #15 on: September 18, 2008, 10:14:57 pm »
Ignore

There is, of course, no formal economic definition of a "depression." The question is meaningless.
Logged
Smid
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6086
Australia


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: September 18, 2008, 10:18:03 pm »
Ignore

JFern, your signature line proves FDR's failures in improving the economy - despite the fact that there was a 9% rise in unemployment under Hoover, in all his years as President, FDR was only able to grow the economy enough to bring back half the jobs. So despite the fact he's at the top of your list, he was probably the least successful in improving the unemployment rate of all the presidents on there.
Logged
memphis
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 16125


View Profile
« Reply #17 on: September 18, 2008, 10:28:18 pm »
Ignore

No and if we did we'd better hope we don't get a president who extends it (like FDR).
Perhaps that president would end it by declaring an unnecessary war even sooner than FDR did

What would you do after Pearl Harbor? Stick your head in the sand? Invade Iraq?
Logged

I cannot do anything good under my own power. 
I don't want my women talking to people
??????????
StatesRights
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 31255
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

View Profile
« Reply #18 on: September 18, 2008, 10:31:38 pm »
Ignore

What would you do after Pearl Harbor?

Go to war with Germany of course, duh.
Logged
memphis
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 16125


View Profile
« Reply #19 on: September 18, 2008, 10:33:56 pm »
Ignore

What would you do after Pearl Harbor?

Go to war with Germany of course, duh.

They were allied with Japan, duh.
Logged

I cannot do anything good under my own power. 
I don't want my women talking to people
Duke
AHDuke99
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 20687


View Profile
« Reply #20 on: September 18, 2008, 10:43:15 pm »
Ignore

Obama raising taxes in the middle of this al la FDR is a good way to cause one. We know he's rooting for it right now.

Most people would get a tax cut, at least if they still have jobs after the Bush economy.

Okay. Let's raise taxes on the wealthy, capital gains, payroll, and social security and see how the economy responds. I bet it would turn around!
I highly doubt Obama is going to attempt to do all of that at once. That said the immense costs of what he seems to be advocating make me extremely nervous. We have enough unfunded liabilities as it stands without him promising to use government to practically part the seas.

His tax cut is much cheaper than McCain's.

Well, Obama is calling for billions more in spending. Last time I checked, McCain wanted to cut spending, something his record has shown for a long time. Cutting taxes and increasing spending makes little sense, and this is what Bush did that got him in so much trouble.
Logged
○∙◄☻tπ[╪AV┼cV└
jfern
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 34066


View Profile
« Reply #21 on: September 18, 2008, 10:45:21 pm »
Ignore


Well, Obama is calling for billions more in spending. Last time I checked, McCain wanted to cut spending, something his record has shown for a long time. Cutting taxes and increasing spending makes little sense, and this is what Bush did that got him in so much trouble.

McCain isn't going to cut spending. He will continue wasting money on this Iraq war and corporate bailouts. Palin will push for some more Bridge to Nowheres in Alaska.
Logged

Duke
AHDuke99
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 20687


View Profile
« Reply #22 on: September 18, 2008, 10:48:44 pm »
Ignore


Well, Obama is calling for billions more in spending. Last time I checked, McCain wanted to cut spending, something his record has shown for a long time. Cutting taxes and increasing spending makes little sense, and this is what Bush did that got him in so much trouble.

McCain isn't going to cut spending. He will continue wasting money on this Iraq war and corporate bailouts. Palin will push for some more Bridge to Nowheres in Alaska.

Goodness. It's kind of impossible to win with you. The war in Iraq is drawing to a close and both candidates will begin to draw down troops fairly soon. Obama wants to delay it so he can win the Presidency first. Statements like Palin pushing for a bridge to nowhere is pretty silly to say.

And what would Obama have done with the financial crisis? He wouldn't have supported the bailouts?
Logged
○∙◄☻tπ[╪AV┼cV└
jfern
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 34066


View Profile
« Reply #23 on: September 18, 2008, 10:51:51 pm »
Ignore


Well, Obama is calling for billions more in spending. Last time I checked, McCain wanted to cut spending, something his record has shown for a long time. Cutting taxes and increasing spending makes little sense, and this is what Bush did that got him in so much trouble.

McCain isn't going to cut spending. He will continue wasting money on this Iraq war and corporate bailouts. Palin will push for some more Bridge to Nowheres in Alaska.

Goodness. It's kind of impossible to win with you. The war in Iraq is drawing to a close and both candidates will begin to draw down troops fairly soon. Obama wants to delay it so he can win the Presidency first. Statements like Palin pushing for a bridge to nowhere is pretty silly to say.

And what would Obama have done with the financial crisis? He wouldn't have supported the bailouts?

You claimed McCain wanted to cut spending. Obama is irrelevant to that claim. Do you really think that McCain plans on leaving Iraq soon? He was strongly against any sort of timetable before.
Logged

Duke
AHDuke99
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 20687


View Profile
« Reply #24 on: September 18, 2008, 10:53:20 pm »
Ignore


Well, Obama is calling for billions more in spending. Last time I checked, McCain wanted to cut spending, something his record has shown for a long time. Cutting taxes and increasing spending makes little sense, and this is what Bush did that got him in so much trouble.

McCain isn't going to cut spending. He will continue wasting money on this Iraq war and corporate bailouts. Palin will push for some more Bridge to Nowheres in Alaska.

Goodness. It's kind of impossible to win with you. The war in Iraq is drawing to a close and both candidates will begin to draw down troops fairly soon. Obama wants to delay it so he can win the Presidency first. Statements like Palin pushing for a bridge to nowhere is pretty silly to say.

And what would Obama have done with the financial crisis? He wouldn't have supported the bailouts?

You claimed McCain wanted to cut spending. Obama is irrelevant to that claim. Do you really think that McCain plans on leaving Iraq soon? He was strongly against any sort of timetable before.

He was against cutting and running, but now that the Iraqi government is calling for a timetable, I would surely hope he isn't for overriding their wishes and staying in. And I don't think he is.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines