McCain wanted Iraq "surge" since '03; why didn't he try to unseat Bush in '04?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 16, 2024, 04:07:23 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2008 Elections
  2008 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
  McCain wanted Iraq "surge" since '03; why didn't he try to unseat Bush in '04?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: McCain wanted Iraq "surge" since '03; why didn't he try to unseat Bush in '04?  (Read 1280 times)
Punditty
Rookie
**
Posts: 72


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 03, 2008, 03:38:23 AM »

http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-news/1440996-surge...
excerpt from column:

If McCain felt so strongly about the need to send more troops to Iraq as early as 2003, why didn’t he challenge Bush for the 2004 Republican nomination? That would have been the mark of a true maverick. It wouldn’t have been easy, but if McCain felt so strongly about amping up operations in Iraq for so long, why did he wait another four years to take his views before the American people? Simple: He put George W. Bush’s re-election efforts and the Republican Party first, and the well-being of America’s combat troops second.

Rather than take his case to the American people, McCain hit the campaign trail to help Bush get re-elected. In the first two years of Bush’s second term, more than 1,500 American troops were killed in Iraq.

With a month to go before Election Day, McCain and his surrogate Palin cynically hide behind political phraseology, repeating that the surge worked, the surge worked and oh, by the way, did you know that the surge worked? I suppose that depends on who you talk to.

To borrow from Ernest Hemingway, “Ask the infantry and ask the dead.”

Full column:
http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-news/1440996-surge...


Logged
cannonia
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 960
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.42, S: -1.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 03, 2008, 08:27:31 AM »

The surge worked.  McCain didn't run in 2004 because he would not have won.  Sitting presidents win nomination for reelection.  McCain apparently preferred a second Bush presidency to a Kerry presidency.
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,156
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 03, 2008, 04:54:47 PM »

No first term President who sought renomination has been denied it since 1856, as Reagan found out in 1976 and Kennedy in 1980.  No way anyone could have kept W from being renominated, especially sice they'd have had to have laid the groundwork in 2003 when Bush was far more popular than he ever would be again.  That popularity likely played into Hillary's decision to not run in 2004.
Logged
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,069
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 03, 2008, 09:03:05 PM »

Bush was popular with his own party in 2004. End of story.
Logged
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 04, 2008, 02:05:58 AM »

Politics lost all its' surprises in 1968. End of story.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.216 seconds with 14 queries.