Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
October 02, 2014, 05:32:09 am
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Please delete your old personal messages.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
| |-+  Election What-ifs?
| | |-+  Alternative Elections (Moderators: Bacon King, Dallasfan65)
| | | |-+  1932: John Nance Garner vs Herbert Hoover
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: 1932: John Nance Garner vs Herbert Hoover  (Read 2569 times)
Workers' Friend
Bob Dole
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1298
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.42, S: 9.48

View Profile
« on: October 23, 2008, 08:32:10 pm »
Ignore

FDR doesn't run, and Garner wins the nomination.

Democrat: Speaker of House John Nance Garner/FDR
Republican: Hebert Hoover/Charles Curtis

Can Garner win by promising the things FDR did? Or are people too paranoid to picka Southerner, despite Hoover's awful Depression?
Logged

Im for the poor man all poor men, black and white, they all gotta have a chance. - Governor and Senator Huey Long (D - LA)



Huey Long, one of America's greatest unsung heroes
ℒief
Lief
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 32928
Dominica


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: October 23, 2008, 08:36:02 pm »
Ignore

Pretty sure any Democrat would have beaten Hoover. And it's not like FDR ran on some radical leftist platform anyway; his only campaign promise was balancing the budget.
Logged

Workers' Friend
Bob Dole
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1298
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.42, S: 9.48

View Profile
« Reply #2 on: October 24, 2008, 11:06:38 am »
Ignore

I see, so if Garner promised the same thing, he'd kick Hoover in the pansers? (using Old Timey term there)
Logged

Im for the poor man all poor men, black and white, they all gotta have a chance. - Governor and Senator Huey Long (D - LA)



Huey Long, one of America's greatest unsung heroes
Robespierre's Jaw
Senator Conor Flynn
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8507
Ireland, Republic of


Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: -8.35

View Profile
« Reply #3 on: October 24, 2008, 04:19:23 pm »
Ignore

There's no doubt that Garner would defeat President Hoover in 1932, had he indeed been the Democratic nominee instead of Governor Roosevelt. However, President Hoover probably would have performed much better in the North thus narrowing the margin of Garner's victory.
Logged



Here's to the State of Richard Nixon

Some things are better left covered up.
Workers' Friend
Bob Dole
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1298
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.42, S: 9.48

View Profile
« Reply #4 on: October 25, 2008, 12:29:34 am »
Ignore

There's no doubt that Garner would defeat President Hoover in 1932, had he indeed been the Democratic nominee instead of Governor Roosevelt. However, President Hoover probably would have performed much better in the North thus narrowing the margin of Garner's victory.

Yeah, would Garner do better in reelection, if things went like under our FDR?
Logged

Im for the poor man all poor men, black and white, they all gotta have a chance. - Governor and Senator Huey Long (D - LA)



Huey Long, one of America's greatest unsung heroes
Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 29684
United States


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: October 25, 2008, 11:09:42 am »
Ignore

By 1936 the US was still Deep in the Depression granted it had improved slightly(Unemployment going from 25% to 15 or 16%) but it was still a Depression and without the Charismatic FDR it is possible that Landon or maybe someone else could have beaten Garner in 1936. It is also possible that Garner could have lost the nomination to someone on the left.
The Depression was a monster and it could have eaten any politican for Breakfast and spit them out for lunch. Indeed that almost happened to FDR in 1940. Had that election been about the economy then Wilkie would have won. The economic gains that FDR had achieved were lost in 1937-38, Plus Roosevelts attempt to pack the Court, and breaking the three term precendent together would have been enough to send him packing. With the growing threat of Hitler and the Japanese Americans though it seemed best to stick with a strong leader then to choose an unknown in uncertain times.
Logged

He's BACK!!! His Time Has Come Once Again! Now We're All Gonna Die! No One is Safe From His Wrath!



Workers' Friend
Bob Dole
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1298
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.42, S: 9.48

View Profile
« Reply #6 on: October 25, 2008, 11:45:30 am »
Ignore

By 1936 the US was still Deep in the Depression granted it had improved slightly(Unemployment going from 25% to 15 or 16%) but it was still a Depression and without the Charismatic FDR it is possible that Landon or maybe someone else could have beaten Garner in 1936. It is also possible that Garner could have lost the nomination to someone on the left.
The Depression was a monster and it could have eaten any politican for Breakfast and spit them out for lunch. Indeed that almost happened to FDR in 1940. Had that election been about the economy then Wilkie would have won. The economic gains that FDR had achieved were lost in 1937-38, Plus Roosevelts attempt to pack the Court, and breaking the three term precendent together would have been enough to send him packing. With the growing threat of Hitler and the Japanese Americans though it seemed best to stick with a strong leader then to choose an unknown in uncertain times.

Hm... I see
Logged

Im for the poor man all poor men, black and white, they all gotta have a chance. - Governor and Senator Huey Long (D - LA)



Huey Long, one of America's greatest unsung heroes
Lincoln Republican
Winfield
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 10528


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: November 09, 2008, 06:18:24 pm »
Ignore

Instead of Roosevelt 472 Hoover 59

Garner                 430
Hoover                 101



Because of the enormity of the economic crisis, with the nation thrown into a depression while Hoover was President, any credible Democrat, such as Garner, wins in a landslide, in this case, only somewhat smaller than the FDR landslide.
« Last Edit: November 09, 2008, 06:35:28 pm by Romney/Graham 2012 »Logged



July 2 , 2014

President Obama has topped predecessor George W. Bush in another poll, but not one he would like.

In a new Quinnipiac University Poll, 33% named Obama the worst president since World War II, and 28% put Bush at the bottom of post-war presidents.

OBAMA WORSE THAN DUBYA!  WHO KNEW?
Warner for Senate '14
benconstine
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 30608
United States


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: November 09, 2008, 06:20:13 pm »
Ignore

Garner, 276-255:
Logged

Obama High's debate team:

"Now let me be clear...I...I...um...uh...now let me be clear.  I strongly condemn the affirmative in the strongest possible terms, and I am closely monitoring their arguments.  Let me be clear on this."
Bo
Rochambeau
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 14388
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -5.23, S: -2.52

View Profile
« Reply #9 on: December 20, 2009, 01:17:32 am »
Ignore

Garner wins.
Logged

Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines