This is interesting: NY Times endorsements since 1860 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 08:22:11 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  This is interesting: NY Times endorsements since 1860 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: This is interesting: NY Times endorsements since 1860  (Read 7571 times)
Tetro Kornbluth
Gully Foyle
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,848
Ireland, Republic of


« on: November 02, 2008, 03:35:45 PM »

Their pre-1960s choices seem to be entirely dictated by which of the two candidates was the most aristocratic or from New York.

Since then it just shows the alienation of the Intellectual elements in the NE from the Republican Party.
Logged
Tetro Kornbluth
Gully Foyle
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,848
Ireland, Republic of


« Reply #1 on: November 10, 2008, 03:46:45 PM »

Their pre-1960s choices seem to be entirely dictated by which of the two candidates was the most aristocratic or from New York.

Since then it just shows the alienation of the Intellectual elements in the NE from the Republican Party.
Pretty much. Except for Eisenhower. Stevenson was a total nerd, then again, who didn't like Ike?

What is also interesting is how you can see the evolution of the English language overtime from big words and cumbersome sentences to smaller words and sentences that are more graceful.

Or with other words, the dumbing down of the language. And it was far more graceful before.

And how over time the emphasis on candidates shifts more and more to their personalities, read the opening statement on the Mondale endorsement. WTF does that have to do with his ability to be president.
Logged
Tetro Kornbluth
Gully Foyle
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,848
Ireland, Republic of


« Reply #2 on: November 22, 2008, 04:13:07 PM »

Their pre-1960s choices seem to be entirely dictated by which of the two candidates was the most aristocratic or from New York.

Yet they didn't endorse Teddy Roosevelt

Given TR's strange combo of Populism and Nationalism I think he is the exception which proves the rule.

Oh yeah, I would have voted for a dead giraffe over Nixon in 1972. The Dead Giraffe has the advantage of not being evil.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 11 queries.