Home
2012
Election Results
Election Info
Weblog
Wiki
Search
Email
Site Info
Store
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
May 25, 2013, 02:56:51 pm
News:
Cast your ballot in the 2012 Mock Election!
Atlas Forum
Election Archive
2008 Elections
2008 Senatorial Election Polls
(Moderator:
Joe Republic
)
MS: Rasmussen: Wicker 54, Musgrove 43
« previous
next »
Pages:
[
1
]
Author
Topic: MS: Rasmussen: Wicker 54, Musgrove 43 (Read 1513 times)
Sam Spade
SamSpade
YaBB God
Posts: 27978
Political Matrix
E: 2.84, S: 0.00
MS: Rasmussen: Wicker 54, Musgrove 43
«
on:
October 28, 2008, 02:03:31 pm »
New Poll:
Mississippi Senator by Rasmussen on 2008-10-27
Summary: D: 43%, R: 54%, U: 2%
Poll Source URL:
Full Poll Details
Topline Numbers
Wicker 54%
Musgrove 43%
Other 1%
Not Sure 2%
Logged
Former Moderate
Mr. Moderate
Moderators
YaBB God
Posts: 12184
Re: MS: Rasmussen: Wicker 54, Musgrove 43
«
Reply #1 on:
October 28, 2008, 03:43:25 pm »
My gut says it'll be a tad closer than this.
Say, didn't Harry have some sort of bet riding on this race?
Logged
Quote from: © Tweedism is for poseurs in junior high on January 31, 2013, 04:28:53 pm
Mr Moderate at 54/10 is a total joke, he is a horror.
Sam Spade
SamSpade
YaBB God
Posts: 27978
Political Matrix
E: 2.84, S: 0.00
Re: MS: Rasmussen: Wicker 54, Musgrove 43
«
Reply #2 on:
October 28, 2008, 04:27:49 pm »
Quote from: Mr. Moderate, President on October 28, 2008, 03:43:25 pm
My gut says it'll be a tad closer than this.
Say, didn't Harry have some sort of bet riding on this race?
What I might start watching for is to see in KY, GA or MS (and NC) if there is any pushback towards the argument "don't give the Dems all the power".
This poll shows what might be, some signs of that (plus the inventive black advertising on the part of Wicker). Unfortunately, Insider Advantage is not a good way figuring out Georgia.
Logged
Mr.Phips
YaBB God
Posts: 4817
Re: MS: Rasmussen: Wicker 54, Musgrove 43
«
Reply #3 on:
October 28, 2008, 06:03:22 pm »
Quote from: John Zogby on October 28, 2008, 04:27:49 pm
Quote from: Mr. Moderate, President on October 28, 2008, 03:43:25 pm
My gut says it'll be a tad closer than this.
Say, didn't Harry have some sort of bet riding on this race?
What I might start watching for is to see in KY, GA or MS (and NC) if there is any pushback towards the argument "don't give the Dems all the power".
This poll shows what might be, some signs of that (plus the inventive black advertising on the part of Wicker). Unfortunately, Insider Advantage is not a good way figuring out Georgia.
That probably wont work in North Carolina, since Obama is leading there. If Obama wins NC, so does Hagan.
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
YaBB God
Posts: 27978
Political Matrix
E: 2.84, S: 0.00
Re: MS: Rasmussen: Wicker 54, Musgrove 43
«
Reply #4 on:
October 28, 2008, 06:05:11 pm »
Quote from: Mr.Phips on October 28, 2008, 06:03:22 pm
Quote from: John Zogby on October 28, 2008, 04:27:49 pm
Quote from: Mr. Moderate, President on October 28, 2008, 03:43:25 pm
My gut says it'll be a tad closer than this.
Say, didn't Harry have some sort of bet riding on this race?
What I might start watching for is to see in KY, GA or MS (and NC) if there is any pushback towards the argument "don't give the Dems all the power".
This poll shows what might be, some signs of that (plus the inventive black advertising on the part of Wicker). Unfortunately, Insider Advantage is not a good way figuring out Georgia.
That probably wont work in North Carolina, since Obama is leading there. If Obama wins NC, so does Hagan.
You know, as well as I do, the composition of the "undecided" voters in NC. They're already starting to move.
Logged
Adlai Stevenson
YaBB God
Posts: 3467
Re: MS: Rasmussen: Wicker 54, Musgrove 43
«
Reply #5 on:
October 28, 2008, 06:08:25 pm »
MISSISSIPPI PRESIDENT -
54% (R) McCain
45% (D) Obama
MISSISSIPPI SENATE -
52% (R) Wicker
47% (D) Musgrove
Logged
[img/http://blog.pennlive.com/thrive/2007/08/WINEHOUSE1.jpgimg]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FpJQq8MoR-g
Mr.Phips
YaBB God
Posts: 4817
Re: MS: Rasmussen: Wicker 54, Musgrove 43
«
Reply #6 on:
October 28, 2008, 06:22:41 pm »
Quote from: John Zogby on October 28, 2008, 06:05:11 pm
Quote from: Mr.Phips on October 28, 2008, 06:03:22 pm
Quote from: John Zogby on October 28, 2008, 04:27:49 pm
Quote from: Mr. Moderate, President on October 28, 2008, 03:43:25 pm
My gut says it'll be a tad closer than this.
Say, didn't Harry have some sort of bet riding on this race?
What I might start watching for is to see in KY, GA or MS (and NC) if there is any pushback towards the argument "don't give the Dems all the power".
This poll shows what might be, some signs of that (plus the inventive black advertising on the part of Wicker). Unfortunately, Insider Advantage is not a good way figuring out Georgia.
That probably wont work in North Carolina, since Obama is leading there. If Obama wins NC, so does Hagan.
You know, as well as I do, the composition of the "undecided" voters in NC. They're already starting to move.
Obama still leads in the state 49%-48% and Hagan is running ahead of him.
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
YaBB God
Posts: 27978
Political Matrix
E: 2.84, S: 0.00
Re: MS: Rasmussen: Wicker 54, Musgrove 43
«
Reply #7 on:
October 28, 2008, 06:24:57 pm »
Quote from: Mr.Phips on October 28, 2008, 06:22:41 pm
Quote from: John Zogby on October 28, 2008, 06:05:11 pm
Quote from: Mr.Phips on October 28, 2008, 06:03:22 pm
Quote from: John Zogby on October 28, 2008, 04:27:49 pm
Quote from: Mr. Moderate, President on October 28, 2008, 03:43:25 pm
My gut says it'll be a tad closer than this.
Say, didn't Harry have some sort of bet riding on this race?
What I might start watching for is to see in KY, GA or MS (and NC) if there is any pushback towards the argument "don't give the Dems all the power".
This poll shows what might be, some signs of that (plus the inventive black advertising on the part of Wicker). Unfortunately, Insider Advantage is not a good way figuring out Georgia.
That probably wont work in North Carolina, since Obama is leading there. If Obama wins NC, so does Hagan.
You know, as well as I do, the composition of the "undecided" voters in NC. They're already starting to move.
Obama still leads in the state 49%-48% and Hagan is running ahead of him.
But still under 50%...
Logged
Harry
YaBB God
Posts: 17687
Re: MS: Rasmussen: Wicker 54, Musgrove 43
«
Reply #8 on:
October 28, 2008, 07:01:00 pm »
Well, gee, I hope this is a 1/20. I don't know what would have caused the balance of opinion to shift this much...
Logged
All life is a blur of Republicans and meat.
Eraserhead
YaBB God
Posts: 36286
Re: MS: Rasmussen: Wicker 54, Musgrove 43
«
Reply #9 on:
October 29, 2008, 01:19:41 am »
Why do you do these things to yourself, Harry?
Logged
Gravis Marketing
brittain33
YaBB God
Posts: 11992
Re: MS: Rasmussen: Wicker 54, Musgrove 43
«
Reply #10 on:
October 29, 2008, 08:11:50 am »
Quote from: Harry the Greatest on October 28, 2008, 07:01:00 pm
Well, gee, I hope this is a 1/20. I don't know what would have caused the balance of opinion to shift this much...
Another poll showed a very similar result. The result on Election Day could still be different, but there's a good case to accept this as the current state of polling, or at least close to it.
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
YaBB God
Posts: 27978
Political Matrix
E: 2.84, S: 0.00
Re: MS: Rasmussen: Wicker 54, Musgrove 43
«
Reply #11 on:
October 29, 2008, 09:59:22 am »
Quote from: brittain33 on October 29, 2008, 08:11:50 am
Quote from: Harry the Greatest on October 28, 2008, 07:01:00 pm
Well, gee, I hope this is a 1/20. I don't know what would have caused the balance of opinion to shift this much...
Another poll showed a very similar result. The result on Election Day could still be different, but there's a good case to accept this as the current state of polling, or at least close to it.
Well, but that's a uni...
The real question in my mind is whether Wicker is actually getting 10% of the black vote. Because if so, Musgrove is dead (he's not going to pull above 25% of the white vote in any scenario).
Logged
Sibboleth
Realpolitik
Moderators
YaBB God
Posts: 53027
Re: MS: Rasmussen: Wicker 54, Musgrove 43
«
Reply #12 on:
October 29, 2008, 11:15:44 am »
Quote from: John Zogby on October 29, 2008, 09:59:22 am
Quote from: brittain33 on October 29, 2008, 08:11:50 am
Quote from: Harry the Greatest on October 28, 2008, 07:01:00 pm
Well, gee, I hope this is a 1/20. I don't know what would have caused the balance of opinion to shift this much...
Another poll showed a very similar result. The result on Election Day could still be different, but there's a good case to accept this as the current state of polling, or at least close to it.
Well, but that's a uni...
The real question in my mind is whether Wicker is actually getting 10% of the black vote. Because if so, Musgrove is dead (he's not going to pull above 25% of the white vote in any scenario).
Not just dead, but already buried with a fancy headstone and everything.
Logged
'Gentlemen, a desert. A place of savage reference for the good people of Ohio. A place to fear and love. A blasted region. Something to remind us what we hewed out of. A place without malls. An Other for Ohio's Self. Cacti and scorpions and the sun bearing down. Desolation. A place for people to wander alone. To reflect. Away from everything. Gentlemen, a desert.'
Harry
YaBB God
Posts: 17687
Re: MS: Rasmussen: Wicker 54, Musgrove 43
«
Reply #13 on:
October 29, 2008, 06:38:36 pm »
Quote from: brittain33 on October 29, 2008, 08:11:50 am
Quote from: Harry the Greatest on October 28, 2008, 07:01:00 pm
Well, gee, I hope this is a 1/20. I don't know what would have caused the balance of opinion to shift this much...
Another poll showed a very similar result. The result on Election Day could still be different, but there's a good case to accept this as the current state of polling, or at least close to it.
Wrong. The last two polls before this one were Wicker +1 and Wicker +2. Those are the only other two in the last month. The ones over a month old are around Wicker +5, suggesting the race has tightened.
So, either the race tightened and then without provocation opened a huge gap, or this poll is wrong. I can't say which one is true, but I imagine the latter is more likely.
Logged
Pages:
[
1
]
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> 2016 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2000 U.S. Presidential Election Results
=> Presidential Election Trends
=> Election What-ifs?
===> Past Election What-ifs (US)
===> Alternative Elections
===> International What-ifs
-----------------------------
Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Gubernatorial/Statewide Elections
===> 2013 & Odd Year Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2014 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> Congressional Elections
===> 2014 Senatorial Election Polls
=> International Elections
=> Election Predictions
-----------------------------
Questions and Answers
-----------------------------
=> Presidential Election Process
===> Electoral Reform
===> Polling
=> The Atlas
===> How To
-----------------------------
General Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Constitution and Law
=> Religion & Philosophy
=> History
===> Alternative History
-----------------------------
General Politics
-----------------------------
=> U.S. General Discussion
=> Political Geography & Demographics
=> International General Discussion
=> Economics
=> Individual Politics
=> Political Debate
===> Political Essays & Deliberation
===> Book Reviews and Discussion
-----------------------------
Election Archive
-----------------------------
=> 2012 Elections
===> 2012 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2012 House Election Polls
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2012 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> 2010 Elections
===> 2010 House Election Polls
===> 2010 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2010 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> 2008 Elections
===> 2008 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2008 Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Polls
=> 2006 Elections
===> 2006 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2006 Gubernatorial Election Polls
-----------------------------
Forum Community
-----------------------------
=> Forum Community
===> Forum Community Election Match-ups
=> Election and History Games
===> Mock Parliment
===> Town Hall
===> Survivor
===> Interactive Timelines
=> Off-topic Board
-----------------------------
Atlas Fantasy Elections
-----------------------------
=> Atlas Fantasy Elections
===> Voting Booth
=> Atlas Fantasy Government
===> Constitutional Convention
===> Regional Governments
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Powered by SMF 1.1.18
|
SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Loading...