Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 19, 2013, 08:36:16 am
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Cast your ballot in the 2012 Mock Election!

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  Election Archive
| |-+  2012 Elections (Moderators: Mr. Morden, Bacon King, Big DaddyTX)
| | |-+  Where does Obama go on the "offensive" in 2012?
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: Where does Obama go on the "offensive" in 2012?  (Read 3249 times)
All life is a blur of Republicans and meat.
Eraserhead
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 36348
United States


View Profile
« on: November 05, 2008, 12:17:15 pm »
Ignore

Fighting on your enemy's  turf is an important part of winning the media's narrative in any election, but Barack already won nearly every state he could have possibly hoped to this year from the Republican column. So where does he go on the offensive in 2012?

I'd guess that these will be his top targets...

1. Arizona
2. Missouri
3. Montana
4. Georgia
5. South Dakota
6. North Dakota

What do you think?
Logged

I went to the drink fountain with the intention of getting a diet drink, but I accidentally hit the Dr Pepper lever.  I didn't realize it until the cup was full.
BeccaM
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1033
United States


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: November 05, 2008, 12:21:42 pm »
Ignore

I thought this would be about his campaign message. Obviously the change theme won't work anymore, so hopefully he has some accomplishments to pitch.
Logged

BlueSwan
blueswan
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 425
Denmark


Political Matrix
E: -4.26, S: -7.30

View Profile
« Reply #2 on: November 05, 2008, 01:46:44 pm »
Ignore

I thought this would be about his campaign message. Obviously the change theme won't work anymore, so hopefully he has some accomplishments to pitch.
Haha, yeah the change theme ain't gonna fly in 2012.

Anyway, the most likely scenario is probably Obama wanting to hold on to the states he won this year with a possible attempt at Arizona (would probably have gone Obama if it hadn't been for McCain being the GOP nominee), Georgia and Missouri. Montana is a possibily but hey, it's 3 electoral votes so who cares?

One smart pitch that I think he could have attempted already this year, was going heavily after Texas. I would have been very curious to see how close that could have gotten if he had really invested there.
Logged
BlueSwan
blueswan
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 425
Denmark


Political Matrix
E: -4.26, S: -7.30

View Profile
« Reply #3 on: November 05, 2008, 01:49:27 pm »
Ignore

Just to clarifly, I'm not suggesting that Obama could have won Texas this year, but my feeling is that democrats would be well advised to start swaying over Texas voters. McCain carried the state by 12 points, but Texas wasn't contested and have lots of latino voters. If democrats want to turn it around at some point, they should start investing.
Logged
paul718
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4045


Political Matrix
E: 4.00, S: -4.35

View Profile
« Reply #4 on: November 05, 2008, 01:53:19 pm »
Ignore

I thought this would be about his campaign message. Obviously the change theme won't work anymore, so hopefully he has some accomplishments to pitch.

"Four years ago, you voted for change.  We've given you change...[insert various statistics]...But we aren't finished yet."
Logged
big bad fab
filliatre
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 13944
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: 1.42, S: 4.87

P P P

View Profile
« Reply #5 on: November 05, 2008, 05:02:10 pm »
Ignore

Just to clarifly, I'm not suggesting that Obama could have won Texas this year, but my feeling is that democrats would be well advised to start swaying over Texas voters. McCain carried the state by 12 points, but Texas wasn't contested and have lots of latino voters. If democrats want to turn it around at some point, they should start investing.

I agree, the Dems should try to keep on diminishing Latino vote for GOP and so, invest heavily in TX, in order to force Republicans to defend the Lone Star state, their only big state (vs CA and NY and IL for the Dems).

Apart from TX, of course: AZ, MO and GA.
And better for Obama to fight to solidify OH, FL, VA, NC, IN than to go on the offensive in ND, SD, MT, NE-2, MS or WV.
Logged

Enjoy the French elections !
Enjoy polling analysis !
Enjoy my tracker !

http://sondages2012.wordpress.com/
perdedor
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2606
Ireland, Republic of


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: November 05, 2008, 05:30:10 pm »
Ignore

If up against a week opponent, I would take a gander at both Texas and South Carolina. If Obama could improve his numbers in North Texas...he could easily carry the state, no easy task however...especially not for a black guy. Obama actually did exceptionally well in South Carolina considering how little he put towards it post-primary.
Logged

"Respect and uphold society's moral order as you would have society respect and uphold your autonomy." -- Amitai Etzioni, The New Golden Rule
© Tweed the Younger
Miamiu1027
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 34381
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #7 on: November 05, 2008, 08:27:05 pm »
Ignore

'offense' is a silly and artificial construct created by the past cycle's election results.
Logged

"If the Constitution means anything, it surely means that the president does not have unreviewable authority to summarily execute any American whom he concludes is an enemy of the state"

registered somewhere in Georgia AFE
Jacobtm
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3059


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: November 06, 2008, 10:32:27 am »
Ignore

I thought this would be about his campaign message. Obviously the change theme won't work anymore, so hopefully he has some accomplishments to pitch.

"Four years ago, you voted for change.  We've given you change...[insert various statistics]...But we aren't finished yet."

It probably won't be hard for him to take credit for the economy turning around and having gotten out of Iraq. I'd imagine it'd be more like:

"When George Bush was elected in 2000, we started losing jobs, we started losing our houses, we started losing wars, we started losing respect around the world. Now the economy has turned around, Iraq was sucessfully teminated, and we're world leaders again. Don't go back to the failures of Republican rule."
Logged

Why do so many people here cheer on war crimes?
Israel and the United States "killing dozens of civilians with explosives", as you phrase it, has, throughout history, almost always been a good thing.
Senator Ben
benconstine
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 29899
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: 2.61

View Profile
« Reply #9 on: November 06, 2008, 08:42:47 pm »
Ignore

1.  Arizona
2.  Missouri
3.  Georgia
4.  Montana
5.  North Dakota
6.  Alaska
7.  South Carolina
8.  Nebraska, statewide.
Logged

Obama High's debate team:

"Now let me be clear...I...I...um...uh...now let me be clear.  I strongly condemn the affirmative in the strongest possible terms, and I am closely monitoring their arguments.  Let me be clear on this."
Meeker
meekermariner
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 13924


Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: -2.61

View Profile
« Reply #10 on: November 06, 2008, 08:59:34 pm »
Ignore

He should make a serious effort at Texas for the good of the rest of the Democratic Party.
Logged
Lunar
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 30756
Ireland, Republic of
View Profile
« Reply #11 on: November 06, 2008, 09:09:40 pm »
Ignore

I would say that Arizona and Montana would be notable.

He really doesn't have to go for McCain states in order to win...
Logged

this is real
© Tweed the Younger
Miamiu1027
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 34381
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #12 on: November 06, 2008, 09:36:16 pm »
Ignore

where does Bush go on the "offensive" in 1988?

[/1984]



to prove how stupid this is
Logged

"If the Constitution means anything, it surely means that the president does not have unreviewable authority to summarily execute any American whom he concludes is an enemy of the state"

registered somewhere in Georgia AFE
Lіef
Lief
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 27387


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: November 07, 2008, 02:16:50 am »
Ignore

Logged

VP Duke
AHDuke99
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 16547


Political Matrix
E: -1.29, S: -6.35

View Profile
« Reply #14 on: November 07, 2008, 03:01:19 am »
Ignore

What if his term isn't as great as he's built it up to be, and he actually has to play defense?
Logged

I call that getting swindled and pimped
Rural Radical
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 401
United Kingdom


View Profile WWW
« Reply #15 on: November 07, 2008, 03:23:02 am »
Ignore

1. Arizona
2. Texas
3. Montana
4. Missouri
5. Georgia
6. North Dakota
7. South Dakota
8. West Virginia
9. South Carolina
10. Arkansas
Logged

"A week is a long time in Politics"
MR maverick
MR politics
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 586
United States


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: November 07, 2008, 03:27:31 am »
Ignore

1.  Arizona
2.  Missouri
3.  Georgia
4.  Montana
5.  North Dakota
6.  Alaska
7.  South Carolina
8.  Nebraska, statewide
.
Logged

Mr.Phips
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4830


View Profile
« Reply #17 on: November 07, 2008, 04:47:21 am »
Ignore

He first needs to worry about preventing big Republican gains in 2010. 
Logged
Sibboleth
Realpolitik
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 53148
Saint Helena


View Profile WWW
« Reply #18 on: November 07, 2008, 09:49:02 am »
Ignore

He first needs to worry about preventing big Republican gains in 2010. 

Basically.
Logged

phk
phknrocket1k
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 13015


Political Matrix
E: 1.42, S: -1.22

View Profile
« Reply #19 on: November 07, 2008, 10:05:58 am »
Ignore

He first needs to worry about preventing big Republican gains in 2010. 

Basically.

2010 is the class that got re-elected on Bush's coattails in 2004. The Dems could likely gain seats, especially Martinez and Bunning. 

I sense 2012 as the first time the GOP start gaining seats back, Obama better hope its not like a "GOP Revolution". Though a pro-GOP swing in 2010 could prevent the above mentioned 2 from losing in 2010.
« Last Edit: November 07, 2008, 10:23:43 am by phknrocket1k »Logged

InsaneTrollLogic
Angry_Weasel
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 11051
United States


View Profile
« Reply #20 on: November 07, 2008, 11:26:26 am »
Ignore

What if his term isn't as great as he's built it up to be, and he actually has to play defense?

Well, where he got more than the national average-

At any rate...these are the "swing states" coming into 2012-



He first needs to worry about preventing big Republican gains in 2010. 

Basically.

2010 is the class that got re-elected on Bush's coattails in 2004. The Dems could likely gain seats, especially Martinez and Bunning. 

I sense 2012 as the first time the GOP start gaining seats back, Obama better hope its not like a "GOP Revolution". Though a pro-GOP swing in 2010 could prevent the above mentioned 2 from losing in 2010.

Even if Obama does well, he will have to worry about 2014.


Logged
All life is a blur of Republicans and meat.
Eraserhead
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 36348
United States


View Profile
« Reply #21 on: November 08, 2008, 12:19:37 am »
Ignore

where does Bush go on the "offensive" in 1988?

[/1984]



to prove how stupid this is

Irrelevant.
Logged

I went to the drink fountain with the intention of getting a diet drink, but I accidentally hit the Dr Pepper lever.  I didn't realize it until the cup was full.
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Forums Directory