Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
October 31, 2014, 10:24:42 pm
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Don't forget to get your 2013 Gubernatorial Endorsements and Predictions in!

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  Election Archive
| |-+  2012 Elections (Moderators: Mr. Morden, Bacon King, Sheriff Buford TX Justice)
| | |-+  Where does Obama go on the "offensive" in 2012?
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: Where does Obama go on the "offensive" in 2012?  (Read 3626 times)
Eraserhead
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 39175
United States


View Profile
« on: November 05, 2008, 12:17:15 pm »
Ignore

Fighting on your enemy's  turf is an important part of winning the media's narrative in any election, but Barack already won nearly every state he could have possibly hoped to this year from the Republican column. So where does he go on the offensive in 2012?

I'd guess that these will be his top targets...

1. Arizona
2. Missouri
3. Montana
4. Georgia
5. South Dakota
6. North Dakota

What do you think?
Logged

BeccaM
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1111
United States


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: November 05, 2008, 12:21:42 pm »
Ignore

I thought this would be about his campaign message. Obviously the change theme won't work anymore, so hopefully he has some accomplishments to pitch.
Logged

BlueSwan
blueswan
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 495
Denmark


Political Matrix
E: -4.26, S: -7.30

View Profile
« Reply #2 on: November 05, 2008, 01:46:44 pm »
Ignore

I thought this would be about his campaign message. Obviously the change theme won't work anymore, so hopefully he has some accomplishments to pitch.
Haha, yeah the change theme ain't gonna fly in 2012.

Anyway, the most likely scenario is probably Obama wanting to hold on to the states he won this year with a possible attempt at Arizona (would probably have gone Obama if it hadn't been for McCain being the GOP nominee), Georgia and Missouri. Montana is a possibily but hey, it's 3 electoral votes so who cares?

One smart pitch that I think he could have attempted already this year, was going heavily after Texas. I would have been very curious to see how close that could have gotten if he had really invested there.
Logged
BlueSwan
blueswan
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 495
Denmark


Political Matrix
E: -4.26, S: -7.30

View Profile
« Reply #3 on: November 05, 2008, 01:49:27 pm »
Ignore

Just to clarifly, I'm not suggesting that Obama could have won Texas this year, but my feeling is that democrats would be well advised to start swaying over Texas voters. McCain carried the state by 12 points, but Texas wasn't contested and have lots of latino voters. If democrats want to turn it around at some point, they should start investing.
Logged
paul718
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4022


Political Matrix
E: 4.00, S: -4.35

View Profile
« Reply #4 on: November 05, 2008, 01:53:19 pm »
Ignore

I thought this would be about his campaign message. Obviously the change theme won't work anymore, so hopefully he has some accomplishments to pitch.

"Four years ago, you voted for change.  We've given you change...[insert various statistics]...But we aren't finished yet."
Logged
big bad fab
filliatre
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 13946
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: 1.42, S: 4.87

P

View Profile
« Reply #5 on: November 05, 2008, 05:02:10 pm »
Ignore

Just to clarifly, I'm not suggesting that Obama could have won Texas this year, but my feeling is that democrats would be well advised to start swaying over Texas voters. McCain carried the state by 12 points, but Texas wasn't contested and have lots of latino voters. If democrats want to turn it around at some point, they should start investing.

I agree, the Dems should try to keep on diminishing Latino vote for GOP and so, invest heavily in TX, in order to force Republicans to defend the Lone Star state, their only big state (vs CA and NY and IL for the Dems).

Apart from TX, of course: AZ, MO and GA.
And better for Obama to fight to solidify OH, FL, VA, NC, IN than to go on the offensive in ND, SD, MT, NE-2, MS or WV.
Logged

Enjoy the French elections !
Enjoy polling analysis !
Enjoy my tracker !

http://sondages2012.wordpress.com/
perdedor
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2628
United States


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: November 05, 2008, 05:30:10 pm »
Ignore

If up against a week opponent, I would take a gander at both Texas and South Carolina. If Obama could improve his numbers in North Texas...he could easily carry the state, no easy task however...especially not for a black guy. Obama actually did exceptionally well in South Carolina considering how little he put towards it post-primary.
Logged

tweed
Miamiu1027
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 35708
United States


Political Matrix
E: -8.52, S: -8.00

View Profile
« Reply #7 on: November 05, 2008, 08:27:05 pm »
Ignore

'offense' is a silly and artificial construct created by the past cycle's election results.
Logged

in a mirror, dimly lit
Jacobtm
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3054


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: November 06, 2008, 10:32:27 am »
Ignore

I thought this would be about his campaign message. Obviously the change theme won't work anymore, so hopefully he has some accomplishments to pitch.

"Four years ago, you voted for change.  We've given you change...[insert various statistics]...But we aren't finished yet."

It probably won't be hard for him to take credit for the economy turning around and having gotten out of Iraq. I'd imagine it'd be more like:

"When George Bush was elected in 2000, we started losing jobs, we started losing our houses, we started losing wars, we started losing respect around the world. Now the economy has turned around, Iraq was sucessfully teminated, and we're world leaders again. Don't go back to the failures of Republican rule."
Logged

Why do so many people here cheer on war crimes?
Israel and the United States "killing dozens of civilians with explosives", as you phrase it, has, throughout history, almost always been a good thing.
Warner for Senate '14
benconstine
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 30648
United States


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: November 06, 2008, 08:42:47 pm »
Ignore

1.  Arizona
2.  Missouri
3.  Georgia
4.  Montana
5.  North Dakota
6.  Alaska
7.  South Carolina
8.  Nebraska, statewide.
Logged

Obama High's debate team:

"Now let me be clear...I...I...um...uh...now let me be clear.  I strongly condemn the affirmative in the strongest possible terms, and I am closely monitoring their arguments.  Let me be clear on this."
Meeker
meekermariner
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 14170


Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: -2.61

View Profile
« Reply #10 on: November 06, 2008, 08:59:34 pm »
Ignore

He should make a serious effort at Texas for the good of the rest of the Democratic Party.
Logged
Lunar
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 30616
Ireland, Republic of
View Profile
« Reply #11 on: November 06, 2008, 09:09:40 pm »
Ignore

I would say that Arizona and Montana would be notable.

He really doesn't have to go for McCain states in order to win...
Logged

this is real
tweed
Miamiu1027
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 35708
United States


Political Matrix
E: -8.52, S: -8.00

View Profile
« Reply #12 on: November 06, 2008, 09:36:16 pm »
Ignore

where does Bush go on the "offensive" in 1988?

[/1984]



to prove how stupid this is
Logged

in a mirror, dimly lit
Lief
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 33837


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: November 07, 2008, 02:16:50 am »
Ignore

Logged


At the very least, this turn of events seems to validate my prediction that Americans are ready and willing to fully embrace fascism.
I dreamed about Lief spanking Rand Paul.
Duke
AHDuke99
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 20072


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: November 07, 2008, 03:01:19 am »
Ignore

What if his term isn't as great as he's built it up to be, and he actually has to play defense?
Logged
Rural Radical
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 401
United Kingdom


View Profile WWW
« Reply #15 on: November 07, 2008, 03:23:02 am »
Ignore

1. Arizona
2. Texas
3. Montana
4. Missouri
5. Georgia
6. North Dakota
7. South Dakota
8. West Virginia
9. South Carolina
10. Arkansas
Logged

"A week is a long time in Politics"
MR maverick
MR politics
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 586
United States


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: November 07, 2008, 03:27:31 am »
Ignore

1.  Arizona
2.  Missouri
3.  Georgia
4.  Montana
5.  North Dakota
6.  Alaska
7.  South Carolina
8.  Nebraska, statewide
.
Logged

Mr.Phips
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4963


View Profile
« Reply #17 on: November 07, 2008, 04:47:21 am »
Ignore

He first needs to worry about preventing big Republican gains in 2010. 
Logged
Sibboleth
Realpolitik
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 56871
Saint Helena


View Profile WWW
« Reply #18 on: November 07, 2008, 09:49:02 am »
Ignore

He first needs to worry about preventing big Republican gains in 2010. 

Basically.
Logged

"I have become entangled in my own data, and my conclusion stands in direct contradiction to the initial idea from which I started. Proceeding from unlimited freedom, I end with unlimited despotism. I will add, however, that there can be no solution of the social formula except mine."
phk
phknrocket1k
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 12975


Political Matrix
E: 1.42, S: -1.22

View Profile
« Reply #19 on: November 07, 2008, 10:05:58 am »
Ignore

He first needs to worry about preventing big Republican gains in 2010. 

Basically.

2010 is the class that got re-elected on Bush's coattails in 2004. The Dems could likely gain seats, especially Martinez and Bunning. 

I sense 2012 as the first time the GOP start gaining seats back, Obama better hope its not like a "GOP Revolution". Though a pro-GOP swing in 2010 could prevent the above mentioned 2 from losing in 2010.
« Last Edit: November 07, 2008, 10:23:43 am by phknrocket1k »Logged

MooMooMoo, Amith!
Angry_Weasel
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 12637
Antarctica


View Profile
« Reply #20 on: November 07, 2008, 11:26:26 am »
Ignore

What if his term isn't as great as he's built it up to be, and he actually has to play defense?

Well, where he got more than the national average-

At any rate...these are the "swing states" coming into 2012-



He first needs to worry about preventing big Republican gains in 2010. 

Basically.

2010 is the class that got re-elected on Bush's coattails in 2004. The Dems could likely gain seats, especially Martinez and Bunning. 

I sense 2012 as the first time the GOP start gaining seats back, Obama better hope its not like a "GOP Revolution". Though a pro-GOP swing in 2010 could prevent the above mentioned 2 from losing in 2010.

Even if Obama does well, he will have to worry about 2014.


Logged


the result is a sense that we were told to attend a lavish dinner party that was going to be wonderful and by the time we got there, all the lobster and steak had been eaten, a fight had broken out, the police had been called and all that was left was warm beer and chips.
Eraserhead
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 39175
United States


View Profile
« Reply #21 on: November 08, 2008, 12:19:37 am »
Ignore

where does Bush go on the "offensive" in 1988?

[/1984]



to prove how stupid this is

Irrelevant.
Logged

Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines