Yay, we win Utah! Seriously, can we nominate someone that can be advantageous electorally like Crist, Pawlenty??
Isn't it best to find the best candidate? I mean, it's sort of ironic that John Edwards would have had no chance in hell at North Carolina but Barack Obama, from Illinois, did.
I don't see the irony because Obama would not have won nationally in 2004, and especially not North Carolina. You can't compare different candidates to different years they ran. Yeah, John Edwards didn't help much in 2004, but 2008 with the nation ready to dump the GOP against pretty much any candidate (let's be honest here), Edwards would have carried his home state. Of course, you have to subtract all the personal scandals too, but this is all hypothetical.
Honestly, I think Obama will probably win re-election; however, nothing is guaranteed, so it is advantageous to nominate someone who can bring a good record of accomplishment as governor to tee it up against him. We kill three birds with one stone by nominating a centrist governor, from a large or swing state, who has been reelected.
People who come to mind for 2012 are Pawlenty (2 terms, popular, Blue-state Republican). Crist (assuming 2 terms, popular so far, large swing state). Maybe Douglass in Vermont or Carceri in Rhode Island??? Why not??
Jindal - see in 2016 or 2020 (save the best for last)