Tipp/IBD Says Bush 46 Kerry 43
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 11:58:19 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2004 U.S. Presidential Election
  Tipp/IBD Says Bush 46 Kerry 43
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Tipp/IBD Says Bush 46 Kerry 43  (Read 918 times)
Reds4
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 789


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: September 21, 2004, 11:00:38 AM »

Bush up 3 in likely voters with and without Nader, up 1 in registered with and without Nader. Conducted September 14th-18th.

http://www.investors.com/editorial/issues.asp?v=9/21


Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,713
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: September 21, 2004, 11:05:10 AM »

Isn't it amazing that 10% of the electorate will decide who will be the President of the other 90%?

Every vote counts!
Logged
The Vorlon
Vorlon
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,660


Political Matrix
E: 8.00, S: -4.21

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: September 21, 2004, 11:15:32 AM »

There is a clear pattern developing in the polls.

Polls that do hard weight to party ID

Rasmussen - Bush +3.9 (7 day Rolling average)
Zogby - Bush +3
TIPP (Not a "hard weight" but a quota caller) - Bush +3
Battleground - Bush +4

Polls that Do Not Hard Weight

Gallup - Bush +8 (RVs)
CBS - Bush +9 (RVs)

We get a new NBC poll this week, and the DO hardweight so I expect they will show Bush +3-5 or so

(Not this is a change from the Teeter/Hart polls NBC used to do.)

For the record, I think party ID on election day will be very close to even GOP vs Dems.


Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: September 21, 2004, 11:27:09 AM »

So theoretically, if the election were held today and you were to get roughly equivalent party ID, then the polls that do hard weight based on 2000 numbers would potentially be off by 1-3% towards the Democrat side, if I read you clear and right.

Makes sense to me.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.216 seconds with 14 queries.