Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 15, 2014, 11:42:32 pm
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Don't forget to get your 2013 Gubernatorial Endorsements and Predictions in!

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
| |-+  Congressional Elections (Moderator: Joe Republic)
| | |-+  MN Sen Recount (UPDATE: Stuart Smalley certified winner, lawsuit forthcoming)
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 18 19 20 21 22 [23] 24 25 26 27 28 ... 41 Print
Author Topic: MN Sen Recount (UPDATE: Stuart Smalley certified winner, lawsuit forthcoming)  (Read 92704 times)
Lіef
Lief
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 31024
Czech Republic


View Profile
« Reply #550 on: December 08, 2008, 11:31:18 pm »
Ignore

Franken.

He voted Barkley (or Aldrich), changed his mind to Aldrich (or Barkley), then changed his mind a last time to Franken.
Logged

RIP opebo
RIP the jfmtsc
RIP joshgreen
RIP King

Don't get me wrong, I love variety, and get a kick out of all these odors.
Lunar
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 30619
Ireland, Republic of
View Profile
« Reply #551 on: December 08, 2008, 11:32:54 pm »
Ignore

Franken.

He voted Barkley (or Aldrich), changed his mind to Aldrich (or Barkley), then changed his mind a last time to Franken.

Or maybe he marked his two preferences...

I mean, it's a Franken vote, but is it clear?
Logged

this is real
Lunar
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 30619
Ireland, Republic of
View Profile
« Reply #552 on: December 08, 2008, 11:38:30 pm »
Ignore

This one was challenged because the voter is retarded

Logged

this is real
Lіef
Lief
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 31024
Czech Republic


View Profile
« Reply #553 on: December 09, 2008, 12:27:19 am »
Ignore

Franken.

He voted Barkley (or Aldrich), changed his mind to Aldrich (or Barkley), then changed his mind a last time to Franken.

Or maybe he marked his two preferences...

I mean, it's a Franken vote, but is it clear?
It's not 100% clear, but it's more likely a Franken vote than an Other vote. Whether that means it's 51% a Franken vote or 99% a Franken vote, and at what point the judge gets to give the vote to Franken between those two percentages, I don't know.
Logged

RIP opebo
RIP the jfmtsc
RIP joshgreen
RIP King

Don't get me wrong, I love variety, and get a kick out of all these odors.
Lunar
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 30619
Ireland, Republic of
View Profile
« Reply #554 on: December 09, 2008, 12:29:29 am »
Ignore

My understanding is that Minnesota law likes to assume that the person did in fact intend to vote for a candidate.

But is an honest 80% confidence about the vote sufficient?

No clue
Logged

this is real
farewell
Lewis Trondheim
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 58527
India


View Profile
« Reply #555 on: December 09, 2008, 12:07:52 pm »
Ignore

Franken.

He voted Barkley (or Aldrich), changed his mind to Aldrich (or Barkley), then changed his mind a last time to Franken.

Or maybe he marked his two preferences...

I mean, it's a Franken vote, but is it clear?
It's not 100% clear, but it's more likely a Franken vote than an Other vote. Whether that means it's 51% a Franken vote or 99% a Franken vote, and at what point the judge gets to give the vote to Franken between those two percentages, I don't know.
It's much like the Barkley struck, Coleman intended example we had above, with a couple slight discrepancies: At least the voter knew which Al Franken he wanted to vote for (the other guy checked write-in, wrote in "Norm Coleman", left Norm's box free) and the crosses are slightly less ambiguous, though still less than perfectly so.
I'd still say that if this one counts, the other probably should as well.
Logged

I may conceivably reconsider.

Knowing me it's more likely than not.
Verily
Cuivienen
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 16808


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

View Profile
« Reply #556 on: December 09, 2008, 12:31:09 pm »
Ignore

Look at how much time someone spent writing in unique names for each different judge position up for election:

http://senaterecount.startribune.com/media/ballotPDFs/Bloomington_P25_challengedballot1F.pdf

(Unlike the ones where someone obviously signed their name as a write-in for half the offices, this one is a clearly valid vote, however.)
Logged
a combination of tumblr leftism and moshing
BRTD
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 70926
Sweden


View Profile
« Reply #557 on: December 09, 2008, 12:33:38 pm »
Ignore

Here's another one of those Coleman challengers who belong in HELL:

http://senaterecount.startribune.com/media/ballotPDFs/Stearns_StWendelP2_challengedballot33.pdf
Logged

Famous True Leftists:

Lіef
Lief
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 31024
Czech Republic


View Profile
« Reply #558 on: December 09, 2008, 01:22:49 pm »
Ignore

Here's another one of those Coleman challengers who belong in HELL:

http://senaterecount.startribune.com/media/ballotPDFs/Stearns_StWendelP2_challengedballot33.pdf
Wait, what? There's nothing unclear about that ballot at all.
Logged

RIP opebo
RIP the jfmtsc
RIP joshgreen
RIP King

Don't get me wrong, I love variety, and get a kick out of all these odors.
MaxQue
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8170
Canada


View Profile
« Reply #559 on: December 09, 2008, 10:33:00 pm »
Ignore

Look at how much time someone spent writing in unique names for each different judge position up for election:

http://senaterecount.startribune.com/media/ballotPDFs/Bloomington_P25_challengedballot1F.pdf

(Unlike the ones where someone obviously signed their name as a write-in for half the offices, this one is a clearly valid vote, however.)

That is a proof of the stupidity of electing judges and you're wrong. He voted for the true candidate for a judge position.
Logged
IDS Attorney General PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 22337
United States


View Profile
« Reply #560 on: December 09, 2008, 10:43:29 pm »
Ignore

Here's another one of those Coleman challengers who belong in HELL:

http://senaterecount.startribune.com/media/ballotPDFs/Stearns_StWendelP2_challengedballot33.pdf

     It would be interesting to see roughly what the percentage was of challenged votes that were in reality completely unambiguous.
Logged

Eraserhead
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 38139
United States


View Profile
« Reply #561 on: December 10, 2008, 03:35:41 pm »
Ignore

Here's another one of those Coleman challengers who belong in HELL:

http://senaterecount.startribune.com/media/ballotPDFs/Stearns_StWendelP2_challengedballot33.pdf

What could possibly be the basis of the challenge there?
Logged

Lamrock
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 82
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.26, S: -8.00

View Profile
« Reply #562 on: December 10, 2008, 04:39:05 pm »
Ignore

He didn't vote in two of the elections! Nullify his vote!
Logged

Sorry for my posts before: November 8, 2008
Verily
Cuivienen
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 16808


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

View Profile
« Reply #563 on: December 10, 2008, 04:45:55 pm »
Ignore

Look at how much time someone spent writing in unique names for each different judge position up for election:

http://senaterecount.startribune.com/media/ballotPDFs/Bloomington_P25_challengedballot1F.pdf

(Unlike the ones where someone obviously signed their name as a write-in for half the offices, this one is a clearly valid vote, however.)

That is a proof of the stupidity of electing judges and you're wrong. He voted for the true candidate for a judge position.

Huh? What exactly am I wrong about? I'm confused.
Logged
farewell
Lewis Trondheim
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 58527
India


View Profile
« Reply #564 on: December 10, 2008, 04:58:54 pm »
Ignore

Look at how much time someone spent writing in unique names for each different judge position up for election:

http://senaterecount.startribune.com/media/ballotPDFs/Bloomington_P25_challengedballot1F.pdf

(Unlike the ones where someone obviously signed their name as a write-in for half the offices, this one is a clearly valid vote, however.)

That is a proof of the stupidity of electing judges and you're wrong. He voted for the true candidate for a judge position.

Huh? What exactly am I wrong about? I'm confused.
He did that for all judge races but one.
Logged

I may conceivably reconsider.

Knowing me it's more likely than not.
Sam Spade
SamSpade
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 27833


Political Matrix
E: 2.84, S: 0.00

View Profile
« Reply #565 on: December 11, 2008, 05:21:13 pm »
Ignore

http://www.startribune.com/politics/national/senate/35938774.html?elr=KArksLckD8EQDUoaEyqyP4O:DW3ckUiD3aPc:_Yyc:aULPQL7PQLanchO7DiUT
Logged
Torie
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 26873
United States


View Profile
« Reply #566 on: December 11, 2008, 05:22:07 pm »
Ignore


Bring out the violins.
Logged

Lіef
Lief
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 31024
Czech Republic


View Profile
« Reply #567 on: December 11, 2008, 05:41:24 pm »
Ignore

Yeah, it's their fault that an election official improperly threw their vote out. They should just suck it up. It's not like they have a right to vote anyway.
Logged

RIP opebo
RIP the jfmtsc
RIP joshgreen
RIP King

Don't get me wrong, I love variety, and get a kick out of all these odors.
Ronnie
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4822
United States
Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -7.65

View Profile
« Reply #568 on: December 11, 2008, 10:17:50 pm »
Ignore

So, will we have a good idea of who wins tomorrow?
Logged

Born and raised in California
(Jewish) Atheist
Classical Liberal
Verily
Cuivienen
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 16808


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

View Profile
« Reply #569 on: December 11, 2008, 10:29:25 pm »
Ignore

Look at how much time someone spent writing in unique names for each different judge position up for election:

http://senaterecount.startribune.com/media/ballotPDFs/Bloomington_P25_challengedballot1F.pdf

(Unlike the ones where someone obviously signed their name as a write-in for half the offices, this one is a clearly valid vote, however.)

That is a proof of the stupidity of electing judges and you're wrong. He voted for the true candidate for a judge position.

Huh? What exactly am I wrong about? I'm confused.
He did that for all judge races but one.

Ah, true. Maybe it is an identifying mark, then; was this Beryl A. Nord's ballot? (I kid.)


I have to say that the quadriplegic actually has a good case in regards to the signatures--no idea about the registration, of course. But his story is probably not representative.
Logged
farewell
Lewis Trondheim
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 58527
India


View Profile
« Reply #570 on: December 12, 2008, 07:18:35 am »
Ignore

So, will we have a good idea of who wins tomorrow?
Coleman wins. Franken's narrowed the gap but is falling short.

Unless I'm wrong, in which case I'm wrong.-
Logged

I may conceivably reconsider.

Knowing me it's more likely than not.
Ronnie
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4822
United States
Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -7.65

View Profile
« Reply #571 on: December 12, 2008, 11:23:47 am »
Ignore

So, will we have a good idea of who wins tomorrow?
Coleman wins. Franken's narrowed the gap but is falling short.

Unless I'm wrong, in which case I'm wrong.-

Since when was he narrowing the gap?

Also, when is the canvassing board sitting down and doing this thing?
Logged

Born and raised in California
(Jewish) Atheist
Classical Liberal
farewell
Lewis Trondheim
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 58527
India


View Profile
« Reply #572 on: December 12, 2008, 11:35:21 am »
Ignore

So, will we have a good idea of who wins tomorrow?
Coleman wins. Franken's narrowed the gap but is falling short.

Unless I'm wrong, in which case I'm wrong.-

Since when was he narrowing the gap?
Since the Coleman campaign found it necessary to challenge perfectly valid ballots.

A stupidity the other side then duplicated, of course.
Logged

I may conceivably reconsider.

Knowing me it's more likely than not.
Lunar
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 30619
Ireland, Republic of
View Profile
« Reply #573 on: December 12, 2008, 12:10:30 pm »
Ignore

FRANKEN WINS AT COURT
Logged

this is real
Verily
Cuivienen
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 16808


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

View Profile
« Reply #574 on: December 12, 2008, 12:17:40 pm »
Ignore

FRANKEN WINS AT COURT

The absentee ballots will be counted, as will the 133 ballots left out of the recount (but included in the original count. IIRC, the latter is a net +37 for Franken, or something like it. The absentee ballots could give any result at all; there are about 1,500 of them.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 18 19 20 21 22 [23] 24 25 26 27 28 ... 41 Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines