When was Bush's Thermidor?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 11, 2024, 02:02:04 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  When was Bush's Thermidor?
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: When was Bush's Thermidor?  (Read 1745 times)
The Mikado
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,817


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: December 03, 2008, 08:09:15 PM »

Harriet Miers.  Agree/Disagree?
Logged
Kaine for Senate '18
benconstine
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,329
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: December 03, 2008, 08:10:12 PM »

I disagree.  I don't think there was one individual moment; it was a culmination of various events.
Logged
The Populist
Rookie
**
Posts: 230


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: December 03, 2008, 08:13:48 PM »

I disagree.  I don't think there was one individual moment; it was a culmination of various events.

I'm inclined to agree with that.  It's just too difficult to find that single moment, and say, "That's it!"
Logged
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,194
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: December 03, 2008, 08:45:05 PM »

Katrina.
Logged
Stranger in a strange land
strangeland
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,184
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: December 03, 2008, 10:29:03 PM »
« Edited: December 03, 2008, 10:30:58 PM by Stranger in a strange land »


Katrina caused his approvals to slide from high 40s to low 30s, and as far as I can remember, they never rose above 35 after that. Katrina was the end of his post-9/11 media honeymoon, and the end of his ability to get basically anything he wanted out of congress.
Logged
The Mikado
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,817


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: December 03, 2008, 11:29:08 PM »


I agree in a sense. It was one thing when 9/11 happened and Bush couldn't control that, Afghanistan had to happen, Iraq was a failure and a lie but removing Saddam wasn't a bad thing and the response to it was mostly international.

Katrina was where the nation finally realized the depth of the cronyism of the Bush administration, the ineptitude of Bush, and the "photo-op" nature of Rovian politics. It was a domestic hit tht could have been assuaged in multiple ways, yet it was utterly ignored.

For intellectuals though (which was what Thermidor really was, the rise of intellectuals against Robespierre), I think we can trace it back all the way to "Mission Accomplished." At that moment, I think, all the minds in politics scratched their heads and braced for the worst. You could smell Rove on Bush's every word.

The reason I picked Miers is that it was when the Congressional GOP first displayed signs of independence life.  The, "no, you can't put your lawyer on the Supreme Court," reaction was the first sign that Bush and the Republican Party weren't synonymous, and from that point on, he was a lame duck.
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: December 04, 2008, 12:06:00 AM »

I disagree.  I don't think there was one individual moment; it was a culmination of various events.

I'd tend to agree.
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,708
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: December 04, 2008, 12:21:43 AM »

Attorneys.
Logged
Sensei
senseiofj324
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,532
Panama


Political Matrix
E: -2.45, S: -5.57

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: December 04, 2008, 12:36:55 AM »

I'd say, without doubt, Katrina. It showed his complete ineptitude and that of one of his appointees, to boot.
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: December 04, 2008, 01:21:03 AM »

I'd say, without doubt, Katrina. It showed his complete ineptitude and that of one of his appointees, to boot.

I still place the majority of the blame on Nagin, then Blanco, who claimed that she thought it was Bush's job to deploy National Guard troops.  What a freaking joke.
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,981


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: December 04, 2008, 05:22:20 AM »

I'm with Mikado. Miers is when he lost Republicans. Up until that point, they had supported him through everything, even when Dems and Indies turned against him.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: December 04, 2008, 07:44:49 AM »

All the answers in here are pretty reasonable (except for Inks' mention of the less-than-competent Nagin in one breath with the breathtakingly incompetent and arrogant Bush and Blanco, but we've been through that too many times before).
Although sorting through my memories I come up with another point of time entirely: The period between November 2nd, 2004 and January 20th, 2005. Probably not an accurate memory, but nvm. It seems as if, after Bush had won that undeserved second term, he absolutely hadn't the slightest clue what to do with it except playing "lame duck".
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,981


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: December 04, 2008, 08:57:21 PM »

Actually, thinking about it more, I think the defeat of his Social Security privatization might be it. That was really the first time since 9/11 that he had lost a political battle, and he expended pretty much all of his remaining political capital on it. After he gave up on privatizing social security, he became a lame duck.
Logged
Matt Damon™
donut4mccain
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,466
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: December 04, 2008, 09:03:16 PM »

Every single day since 9/11. He has managed to botch the handling of islamic terrorism and domestic affairs to a rare degree. We've had epic failures for domestic policy and for foreign policy but Bush Jr. may possibly be the first POTUS who epically failed at both things at the same time.
Logged
Marokai Backbeat
Marokai Blue
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,477
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.42, S: -7.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: December 04, 2008, 09:05:42 PM »

Everything?
Logged
Matt Damon™
donut4mccain
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,466
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: December 04, 2008, 09:06:18 PM »

Not true. Bush _did_ manage to get the do not call list passed.
Logged
Scam of God
Einzige
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,159
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.19, S: -9.91

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: December 14, 2008, 08:48:02 PM »

I'm going to go on a limb here and say that Ronald Reagan's death had as much to do symbolically with Bush's descent into the depths of unpopularity (at least among his own base) as anything else. While Reagan was alive, the Republican President could prop him up on a stick and rally a diverse coalition of competing interest groups around his memory. With Reagan out of the way, and Bush II taking up the mantle of senior-most Republican, it became much more difficult almost instantly for him to have that same effect.

With the greater populace, of course, it's different: either Katrina or Abu Ghraib might have done the trick.
Logged
Franzl
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,254
Germany


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: December 15, 2008, 08:05:14 AM »

I'm going to go on a limb here and say that Ronald Reagan's death had as much to do symbolically with Bush's descent into the depths of unpopularity (at least among his own base) as anything else. While Reagan was alive, the Republican President could prop him up on a stick and rally a diverse coalition of competing interest groups around his memory. With Reagan out of the way, and Bush II taking up the mantle of senior-most Republican, it became much more difficult almost instantly for him to have that same effect.

With the greater populace, of course, it's different: either Katrina or Abu Ghraib might have done the trick.

Abu Ghraib, I think, meant much more to foreigners than it did to most Americans.
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,010


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: December 15, 2008, 08:44:27 AM »

The reason I picked Miers is that it was when the Congressional GOP first displayed signs of independence life.  The, "no, you can't put your lawyer on the Supreme Court," reaction was the first sign that Bush and the Republican Party weren't synonymous, and from that point on, he was a lame duck.

After he capitulated on Miers, though, they were ready to let bygones be bygones and move on. Bush lost Congress on Social Security, and that may have been a greater setback because it was a major legislative initiative and not a failed nomination.

Katrina made Bush look indefensible.
Logged
Swing low, sweet chariot. Comin' for to carry me home.
jmfcst
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,212
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: December 15, 2008, 12:28:24 PM »
« Edited: December 15, 2008, 12:38:58 PM by jmfcst »


yes, in the broader public's mind. 

To his supporters, like myself, it was the Miers event since it was a totally unforced error of his own making.  He ignored 3 decades of GOP grooming of the finest legal minds and went with Miers.  Definitely was the dumbest move he made in 8 years, though it did the country no harm.  But, giving Bush credit where it is due, he quickly reversed course by choosing Alito.

The insiders on the GOP legal blogs stated the Friday before the Monday announcement that it was going to be Miers, but the choice was so stupid I could not believe it until she was actually announced Monday morning.

Definitely was the moment where I thought, "This Bush character is totally brain dead!"
Logged
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,194
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: December 15, 2008, 12:34:06 PM »

He picked Roberts before Miers, so how was that reversing course?
Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: December 15, 2008, 12:37:36 PM »

Why is it called Lobster Thermidor?

Logged
Swing low, sweet chariot. Comin' for to carry me home.
jmfcst
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,212
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: December 15, 2008, 12:38:34 PM »

He picked Roberts before Miers, so how was that reversing course?

true, I'll make the correction in my post
Logged
The Mikado
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,817


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: December 15, 2008, 11:52:05 PM »

I don't read Lord of the Rings, so I have no idea what this means.

If you want to get the reference, put down Tolkien and pick up De Tocqueville.

In short, Thermidor's the point where a movement ceases to be a radical force that actually changes society and settles down into a stage of sitting on what they already accomplished.  It's the point where society says, "enough!" to a movement.  It's a reference to the original Thermidor, the end of the radical phase of the French Revolution.
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,708
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: December 16, 2008, 01:27:06 AM »

I don't read Lord of the Rings, so I have no idea what this means.

If you want to get the reference, put down Tolkien and pick up De Tocqueville.

In short, Thermidor's the point where a movement ceases to be a radical force that actually changes society and settles down into a stage of sitting on what they already accomplished.  It's the point where society says, "enough!" to a movement.  It's a reference to the original Thermidor, the end of the radical phase of the French Revolution.

I think he knows that.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.048 seconds with 9 queries.