Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 23, 2014, 09:42:38 am
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Please delete your old personal messages.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  Election Archive
| |-+  2008 Elections
| | |-+  2008 Senatorial Election Polls (Moderator: Joe Republic)
| | | |-+  PA-Rasmussen: Sen. Specter (R) in a tight race with Matthews (D)
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 Print
Author Topic: PA-Rasmussen: Sen. Specter (R) in a tight race with Matthews (D)  (Read 7964 times)
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 34912
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -7.10, S: -6.09

P P P

View Profile
« on: December 05, 2008, 01:11:37 am »
Ignore

In thinking about the 2010 Election for United States Senate suppose you had a choice between Republican Arlen Specter and Democrat Chris Matthews. If the election were held today would you vote for Republican Arlen Specter or Democrat Chris Matthews?

Specter - 46%
Matthews - 43%

Obama Approval Ratings:

73% Approve (51% strongly, 22% somewhat)
25% Disapprove (9% somewhat, 16% strongly)

Pennsylvania Survey of 500 Likely Voters - Conducted Dec. 2, 2008 - By Rasmussen Reports

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_2010/election_2010_state_toplines/toplines_pennsylvania_senate_election_december_2_2008
Logged
Aizen
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4540


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -9.22

View Profile
« Reply #1 on: December 05, 2008, 01:15:15 am »
Ignore

aww yeah, we're totally going to get this seat.
Logged
Padfoot
padfoot714
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4426
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.58, S: -6.96

P P P

View Profile
« Reply #2 on: December 05, 2008, 01:33:15 am »
Ignore

aww yeah, we're totally going to get this seat.


23 months.  That's all I'm going to say.
Logged

Warner for President '16
benconstine
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 30667
United States


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: December 05, 2008, 11:30:24 am »
Ignore

I'd rather have Specter than Matthews.
Logged

Obama High's debate team:

"Now let me be clear...I...I...um...uh...now let me be clear.  I strongly condemn the affirmative in the strongest possible terms, and I am closely monitoring their arguments.  Let me be clear on this."
Franzl
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 22285
Germany


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: December 05, 2008, 11:32:44 am »
Ignore

Anybody that takes ANY poll seriously 23 months in advance and actually gives a s**t about it is pathetic.
Logged
Keystone Phil
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 52505


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: December 05, 2008, 12:44:01 pm »
Ignore

As I said elsewhere...

Good news for Specter from that Rasmussen poll - 68% of Republicans have a favorable opinion of him. Sure it should be higher for a Republican Senator but that rating surely isn't weak. The problem for him is that only 70% of Republicans said they'd vote for him in the General.
Logged


Never any doubt.
Lunar
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 30616
Ireland, Republic of
View Profile
« Reply #6 on: December 05, 2008, 12:46:37 pm »
Ignore

I can see that Specter is getting huge swaths of the (D) vote (a must since registration has changed lately), but who will those (R)'s end up voting for?  Surely not Matthews

Lewis you gotta edit your links down in size Smiley
Logged

this is real
Keystone Phil
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 52505


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: December 05, 2008, 12:49:31 pm »
Ignore

I can see that Specter is getting huge swaths of the (D) vote (a must since registration has changed lately), but who will those (R)'s end up voting for?  Surely not Matthews

I'm one of these Republicans caught in a really tough spot. It's pretty funny. I really never want to vote for Specter. I've even said that in a Specter vs. Schwartz matchup, I'd still write in someone.

I love saying that I'd consider voting for Matthews. When push comes to shove, I won't do it. There really is no way that I could. I'd either write in or...don't make me say it...

I think my latter option is what most of these undecided Republicans would do as well.
Logged


Never any doubt.
Beet
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 16203


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: December 05, 2008, 12:58:04 pm »
Ignore

This is closer than I thought it'd be... Specter's age is probably hurting him. Still, he's one of the few moderate Republicans left and one of the few northeast Republican Senators left so I wouldn't exactly be ecstatic about Dems taking him out.
Logged

Keystone Phil
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 52505


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: December 07, 2008, 01:10:48 am »
Ignore

By the way, it looks like Specter has already tried to keep us conservatives happy. My Mom got a mailer today about drilling and it provided a quote for Specter and his desire to open drilling in ANWR. Kind of funny since I'm about 90% sure he opposed that before.
Logged


Never any doubt.
Eraserhead
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 39312
United States


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: December 07, 2008, 01:45:26 am »
Ignore

I can see that Specter is getting huge swaths of the (D) vote (a must since registration has changed lately), but who will those (R)'s end up voting for?  Surely not Matthews

I'm one of these Republicans caught in a really tough spot. It's pretty funny. I really never want to vote for Specter. I've even said that in a Specter vs. Schwartz matchup, I'd still write in someone.

I love saying that I'd consider voting for Matthews. When push comes to shove, I won't do it. There really is no way that I could. I'd either write in or...don't make me say it...

I think my latter option is what most of these undecided Republicans would do as well.

If I managed to vote for Hillary in '06, you can bring yourself to vote for Specter in '10, Phil.
Logged

Keystone Phil
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 52505


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: December 07, 2008, 12:48:20 pm »
Ignore

If I managed to vote for Hillary in '06, you can bring yourself to vote for Specter in '10, Phil.

You and Hillary have ideological similarities.
Logged


Never any doubt.
incredibly specific types of post-punk music
BRTD
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 72759
United Kingdom


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: December 07, 2008, 01:29:46 pm »
Ignore

If I managed to vote for Hillary in '06, you can bring yourself to vote for Specter in '10, Phil.

You and Hillary have ideological similarities.

Then why does he hate her so much?
Logged




01/05/2004-01/10/2014
Keystone Phil
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 52505


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: December 07, 2008, 01:31:22 pm »
Ignore

If I managed to vote for Hillary in '06, you can bring yourself to vote for Specter in '10, Phil.

You and Hillary have ideological similarities.

Then why does he hate her so much?

Uh...ask him. That doesn't mean he can't hate her for other reasons.
Logged


Never any doubt.
Eraserhead
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 39312
United States


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: December 07, 2008, 04:18:14 pm »
Ignore

If I managed to vote for Hillary in '06, you can bring yourself to vote for Specter in '10, Phil.

You and Hillary have ideological similarities.

Not much more than you and Specter would have.
Logged

Keystone Phil
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 52505


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: December 07, 2008, 04:41:23 pm »
Ignore

If I managed to vote for Hillary in '06, you can bring yourself to vote for Specter in '10, Phil.

You and Hillary have ideological similarities.

Not much more than you and Specter would have.

Specter is a pretty standard liberal. I'm a standard conservative. You are maybe slightly left of standard liberal. Same with Hillary.  Tongue
Logged


Never any doubt.
Eraserhead
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 39312
United States


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: December 07, 2008, 08:41:42 pm »
Ignore

If I managed to vote for Hillary in '06, you can bring yourself to vote for Specter in '10, Phil.

You and Hillary have ideological similarities.

Not much more than you and Specter would have.

Specter is a pretty standard liberal. I'm a standard conservative. You are maybe slightly left of standard liberal. Same with Hillary.  Tongue

I don't see how either Specter or Clinton are liberals. Specter is pretty far-right as far as I'm concerned.
Logged

Keystone Phil
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 52505


View Profile
« Reply #17 on: December 07, 2008, 11:20:12 pm »
Ignore

If I managed to vote for Hillary in '06, you can bring yourself to vote for Specter in '10, Phil.

You and Hillary have ideological similarities.

Not much more than you and Specter would have.

Specter is a pretty standard liberal. I'm a standard conservative. You are maybe slightly left of standard liberal. Same with Hillary.  Tongue

I don't see how either Specter or Clinton are liberals. Specter is pretty far-right as far as I'm concerned.

Ok, let opebo be opebo. It doesn't work for you.
Logged


Never any doubt.
Lief
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 34452


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: December 07, 2008, 11:21:14 pm »
Ignore

He's about as far-right as he is a liberal, at least in the American sense of the word.
Logged



Thank you, Mr. President.
Speed of Sound
LiberalPA
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 12848
United States


View Profile
« Reply #19 on: December 07, 2008, 11:57:22 pm »
Ignore

I cannot with a straight face buy a poll that suggests that Chris Matthews can almost out name rec. Arlen Specter. That guy is the king of name rec. I don't care how blue PA trends, if the best we can do is Matthews, then its gonna be up to the Republicans to knock off Specter. or cancer
Logged

“The meaning of life is not to be discovered only after death in some hidden, mysterious realm; on the contrary, it can be found by eating the succulent fruit of the Tree of Life and by living in the here and now as fully and creatively as we can”

~~~~Dr. Paul Kurtz (1925-2012)
Хahar
Xahar
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 38875
Bangladesh


View Profile
« Reply #20 on: December 08, 2008, 01:56:17 am »
Ignore

If all else fails, doesn't the CP run a full slate?
Logged

Update reading list

The idea of parodying the preceding Atlasian's postings is laughable, of course, but not for reasons one might expect.
Keystone Phil
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 52505


View Profile
« Reply #21 on: December 08, 2008, 02:03:50 am »
Ignore

If all else fails, doesn't the CP run a full slate?

Usually but they're usually too right wing for me. I still wouldn't have voted for Jim Clymer in 2004.
Logged


Never any doubt.
Franzl
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 22285
Germany


View Profile
« Reply #22 on: December 08, 2008, 02:14:06 am »
Ignore

If I managed to vote for Hillary in '06, you can bring yourself to vote for Specter in '10, Phil.

You and Hillary have ideological similarities.

Not much more than you and Specter would have.

Specter is a pretty standard liberal. I'm a standard conservative. You are maybe slightly left of standard liberal. Same with Hillary.  Tongue

I'd still consider Specter to be pretty centrist. Standard Liberal definitely isn't true Smiley
Logged
Eraserhead
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 39312
United States


View Profile
« Reply #23 on: December 08, 2008, 08:15:58 am »
Ignore

If I managed to vote for Hillary in '06, you can bring yourself to vote for Specter in '10, Phil.

You and Hillary have ideological similarities.

Not much more than you and Specter would have.

Specter is a pretty standard liberal. I'm a standard conservative. You are maybe slightly left of standard liberal. Same with Hillary.  Tongue

I don't see how either Specter or Clinton are liberals. Specter is pretty far-right as far as I'm concerned.

Ok, let opebo be opebo. It doesn't work for you.

If I'm opebo, you must be Statesrights or something, dude. You can't seriously think that Specter is a "standard liberal", even going by the American standard.
Logged

Eraserhead
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 39312
United States


View Profile
« Reply #24 on: December 08, 2008, 08:17:59 am »
Ignore

By the way, Matthews renewed his contract with NBC. This race isn't going to happen, folks.
Logged

Pages: [1] 2 Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines