Shoes thrown at Bush on Iraq trip
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 09:13:01 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Shoes thrown at Bush on Iraq trip
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3 4
Author Topic: Shoes thrown at Bush on Iraq trip  (Read 6210 times)
Iosif
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,609


Political Matrix
E: -1.68, S: -3.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: December 14, 2008, 03:29:29 PM »

Shame he missed.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/7782422.stm
Logged
Franzl
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,254
Germany


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: December 14, 2008, 03:30:47 PM »

Bush should have thrown back, lol.
Logged
Daniel Adams
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,424
Georgia


Political Matrix
E: 9.03, S: 2.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: December 14, 2008, 03:50:53 PM »

"Some Iraqi journalists stood up to apologise." Heartening.
Logged
Angel of Death
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,411
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: December 14, 2008, 04:03:10 PM »

I normally never do this, but:

Insanely awesome freedom fighter.

And before you twist my words, you retards, no, I'm *not* talking about Bush.
Logged
2952-0-0
exnaderite
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,227


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: December 14, 2008, 04:04:29 PM »

At least he didn't visit the Baghdad City Zoo. There the monkeys would have screamed and thrown poo at him.
Logged
Matt Damon™
donut4mccain
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,466
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: December 14, 2008, 04:19:39 PM »

He's not actually the president.
Logged
Ronnie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,993
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: December 14, 2008, 04:21:30 PM »


Really?  Wikipedia says he is:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_W._Bush
Logged
Matt Damon™
donut4mccain
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,466
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: December 14, 2008, 04:23:10 PM »

His getting power was illegal in the first place. It'll be good for America to have a real president for the first time in 8 years.
Logged
Iosif
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,609


Political Matrix
E: -1.68, S: -3.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: December 14, 2008, 04:23:45 PM »

It's amazing the amount of disrespect liberal jackasses have for the outgoing leader of our country.  These last eight years has suffered from the most childish partisan bickering in years - and the Democrats and the "Bush is a war criminal!" crowd are to blame.  Fortunately, when we are no longer in power we will not stoop to your level.  Even on the sidelines we will continue to support this country and our President.

Still hoping Obama gets shot?
Logged
Ronnie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,993
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: December 14, 2008, 04:24:47 PM »

His getting power was illegal in the first place. It'll be good for America to have a real president for the first time in 8 years.

It's debatable, and he is still your president, whether you like it or not.
Logged
Matt Damon™
donut4mccain
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,466
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: December 14, 2008, 04:25:39 PM »

Nope. Why would I recognize an illegitimate leader?
Logged
Ronnie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,993
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: December 14, 2008, 04:28:35 PM »

Nope. Why would I recognize an illegitimate leader?

Whether or whether not he is your leader is not your decision, no matter how much you hate him.  The electoral college certified him to be our president, and so he is.  It's not open for debate.
Logged
Matt Damon™
donut4mccain
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,466
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: December 14, 2008, 04:29:35 PM »

The EC is a joke and a horrible anachronism. 2000 showed why it was outdated.
Logged
Ronnie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,993
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: December 14, 2008, 04:30:39 PM »

The EC is a joke and a horrible anachronism. 2000 showed why it was outdated.

It's the law and there's nothing you can do about it.
Logged
Matt Damon™
donut4mccain
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,466
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: December 14, 2008, 04:32:45 PM »

Laws change...
Logged
Ronnie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,993
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: December 14, 2008, 04:36:52 PM »

Sure they do, but it's not an adequate reason to debunk the 2000 presidential election of Bush.  It was the law at the time.
Logged
agcatter
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,740


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: December 14, 2008, 04:40:54 PM »

The NYT did a study after the 2000 election which, after examining the ballots remaining, determined that had the Supreme Court not stopped the count Bush would still have won the count.

Yeah, THAT New York Times.  That Bush loving, RNC controlled, Rush Limbaugh parroting, right wing partisan rag New York Times.

Shut up with the we was robbed in Florida bit.  It has long since gotten waaaaay beyond tiring.
Logged
Franzl
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,254
Germany


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: December 14, 2008, 04:42:06 PM »

The NYT did a study after the 2000 election which, after examining the ballots remaining, determined that had the Supreme Court not stopped the count Bush would still have won the count.

Yeah, THAT New York Times.  That Bush loving, RNC controlled, Rush Limbaugh parroting, right wing partisan rag New York Times.

Shut up with the we was robbed in Florida bit.  It has long since gotten waaaaay beyond tiring.

Actually....although I'm certain that Bush lost Florida......that was not even the argument here.....please learn to read. The debate was about the Electoral College.
Logged
Iosif
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,609


Political Matrix
E: -1.68, S: -3.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: December 14, 2008, 04:43:50 PM »

Lets not let this thread get derailed.
Logged
Scam of God
Einzige
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,159
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.19, S: -9.91

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: December 14, 2008, 04:44:39 PM »
« Edited: December 14, 2008, 04:49:12 PM by Einzige »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

I'll say it with a bit more force than my compatriots: Bush is less of a man than most of his critics. He's subhuman and his Christian followers are genetically-and-psychologically inferior weaklings incapable of confronting a world that does not conform to their metaphysical presuppositions. The man is objectively inferior in the natural hierarchy of rank; he is less valuable as a human being than many others. He is unfit for the office he stole and unfit for many others he did not.

Logged
Franzl
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,254
Germany


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: December 14, 2008, 04:45:56 PM »

Nope. Why would I recognize an illegitimate leader?

He's been legitimate for the last 4 years though.....terrifying, isn't it? Smiley
Logged
Scam of God
Einzige
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,159
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.19, S: -9.91

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: December 14, 2008, 04:56:21 PM »

For all you Tinfoil Hat people, Bush won the 2004 election, remember?  Both in the electoral college and the popular vote.  And this is undisputed.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

I'll say it with a bit more force than my compatriots:  Bush. He's subhuman and his Christian followers are genetically-and-psychologically inferior weaklings incapable of confronting a world that does not conform to their metaphysical presuppositions. The man is objectively inferior in the natural hierarchy of rank; he is less valuable as a human being than many others. He is unfit for the office he stole and unfit for many others he did not.



Well you certainly are forceful, I'll give you that, but forcefulness is not a virtue.  What is telling about this is the fact that you say Bush is "objectively inferior" in the "natural hierarchy of rank" (WTF?).  Less valuable as a human being than many others?  Now to me there is nothing more horrible than assigning "value" to people.  Einzige, when you condemn Bush as "sub-human" you condemn yourself.  Look in the mirror.  You may not like what is reflected back at you, but what is the purpose of a mirror if you see a false image?

I do not believe that "all men are created equally" (partially because men are not 'created'); every human is worth only as much as he can do or create. Bush, being of inferior intelligence and quite probably a dullard, is lower in rank than most of his better critics, all of whom seem to have at least some imagination.
Logged
Nhoj
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,224
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.52, S: -7.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: December 14, 2008, 05:15:58 PM »

It's amazing the amount of disrespect liberal jackasses have for the outgoing leader of our country.  These last eight years has suffered from the most childish partisan bickering in years - and the Democrats and the "Bush is a war criminal!" crowd are to blame.  Fortunately, when we are no longer in power we will not stoop to your level.  Even on the sidelines we will continue to support this country and our President.
an iraqi reporter is a liberal jackass? maybe the guy lost his family or something during the war. of course you were talking about the people here who as far as i can tell made only a few posts before you ranted about them all being liberal jackasses as for not stooping to the level of the dems i seriously doubt it as for one thing many of you already do and quite often but of course thats ok because they started it.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: December 14, 2008, 05:46:00 PM »

What a Presidency.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,479
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: December 14, 2008, 06:17:34 PM »

I strongly disapprove of anything that creates sympathy for Mr. Bush.

By the way, is anyone else surprised that he successfully ducked it?
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3 4  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.044 seconds with 13 queries.