Would Barkley have won under Condorcet?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 24, 2024, 11:55:38 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Would Barkley have won under Condorcet?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Would Barkley have won under Condorcet?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 8

Author Topic: Would Barkley have won under Condorcet?  (Read 1335 times)
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,026
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: December 20, 2008, 10:25:38 AM »

Would Barkley have won under Condorcet?
Logged
Horus
Sheliak5
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,775
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: December 20, 2008, 10:29:05 AM »

Excuse my ignorance, but what is Condorcet?
Logged
ag
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,828


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: December 20, 2008, 11:22:59 AM »

Excuse my ignorance, but what is Condorcet?

Binary majority vote. Rephrasing, would Barkley win in a one-on-one race against both Franken and Coleman (separately). Not impossible, actually.
Logged
ilikeverin
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,410
Timor-Leste


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: December 20, 2008, 11:41:20 AM »

Seems pretty likely to me.
Logged
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,026
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: December 20, 2008, 12:00:09 PM »

We know for sure Barkley was preferred by at least 15% of voters to both Coleman and Franken, and the number is even higher when you consider the people who did but voted for Coleman or Franken seeing them as the lesser evil. In addition it's safe to say almost all Franken voters would've preferenced him over Coleman and almost all Coleman voters would've preferenced him over Franken. Barkley would probably win well over 60% against either one.
Logged
Horus
Sheliak5
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,775
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: December 20, 2008, 12:34:01 PM »

Alright, now that I know, absolutely. I can't imagine too many people who would've wanted Coleman and Franken more than Barkley.
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,731
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: December 20, 2008, 02:27:22 PM »

Certainly. This is why Condorcet sucks.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: December 20, 2008, 02:29:22 PM »

Very likely.

And in this case, it's not even an example of Condorcet sucking - you can get scenarios where really illsupported candidates would win under Condorcet though (especially if the major parties provided cheat sheets, leading to large numbers of identical votes), which just doesn't feel right.
Logged
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,026
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: December 20, 2008, 03:50:29 PM »

An example of a crappy candidate winning under Condorcet could be like this. Under FPTP:

R - 49%
D - 48%
Crazy Libertarian - 3%

However with Condorcet you'd have more fringe right Republicans preferencing the Libertarian first, let's say he gets 10% first prefs. And then the Democrats preference him second because he's not a Republican (the noted phenomena in Arkansas and Idaho.) The Libertarian could end up winning assuming a majority of Republican first prefs pref him second. Basically any scenario where a supporter of one of the major candidates absolutely hates the other major party candidate (as this race is a textbook perfect example) and the top third party candidate is a nut rather than a centrist.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.035 seconds with 14 queries.