What's up with New Hampshire? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 01:48:17 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2008 Elections
  What's up with New Hampshire? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: What's up with New Hampshire?  (Read 7474 times)
Verily
Cuivienen
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,663


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

« on: December 24, 2008, 10:14:24 AM »
« edited: December 24, 2008, 10:17:12 AM by Verily »

Whoa creepy, I actually just read an article saying exactly that in Utah, that if your boss thinks you're gay, you can be fired. I guess sh/e doesn't even have to prove it...

And I'd just like to add that, earlier this month was the first time in history that registered Democrats outnumbered registered Republicans in New Hampshire. Smiley

Way off-topic here, but that's not only Utah. It's the vast majority of states.

The following states have laws forbidding firing on any basis of sexuality:

Minnesota
Rhode Island
New Mexico
California
District of Columbia
Illinois
Maine
Hawaii
New Jersey
Washington
Iowa
Oregon
Vermont
Colorado

And the following states have laws forbidding discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, but not other aspects of sexuality (so not transgender people, for example):

Wisconsin
Massachusetts
Connecticut
New Hampshire
Nevada
Maryland
New York

Everywhere else, which is thirty of the fifty states, it is legal to fire someone simply for the suspicion that they are gay. It doesn't need to be proven as long as the suspicion is the basis for the firing (and not some category such as gender or race which does have protection). A parallel case would be one in which someone was fired for suspicion of having, say, Arab ancestry; even if they didn't, they'd be covered under laws against firing based on race or ethnicity.

There are some counties and municipalities in states not listed above which forbid firing on the basis of sexual orientation or sexuality as well, of course. Places like Austin, Texas; Alexandria, Virginia; Fort Lauderdale, Florida, etc. all probably have such laws.
Logged
Verily
Cuivienen
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,663


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

« Reply #1 on: December 24, 2008, 10:30:06 AM »
« Edited: December 24, 2008, 10:32:52 AM by Verily »

The following states have laws forbidding firing on any basis of sexuality:

Minnesota
Rhode Island
New Mexico
California
District of Columbia
Illinois
Maine
Hawaii
New Jersey
Washington
Iowa
Oregon
Vermont
Colorado

And the following states have laws forbidding discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, but not other aspects of sexuality (so not transgender people, for example):

Wisconsin
Massachusetts
Connecticut
New Hampshire
Nevada
Maryland
New York
Holy crap, those are almost all the states Kerry won, bar Nevada. Tongue

It's kinda sad. The article was talking about the only human rights activist group in Utah. It's pretty interesting but a sad read for gay Utahns...

And Colorado and New Mexico. Which should make it really, really obvious why the retreat to radical social conservatism has destroyed the Republican brand in Nevada, New Mexico, Colorado and New Hampshire (which, as this thread points out, was fine with Republicans in 2000, much as the others were in 2004). New Hampshire's voting patterns are not too dissimilar from Colorado, at least, although Colorado is much more geographically polarized and demographically diverse.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 13 queries.