Obama to Introduce Cow Fart Tax (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 07:26:52 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Obama to Introduce Cow Fart Tax (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Obama to Introduce Cow Fart Tax  (Read 6234 times)
Stampever
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 489
« on: January 09, 2009, 10:57:22 AM »

As silly as it sounds, this is a really important step in regulating greenhouse gasses.

If we could somehow work out a volcano tax, that would just be golden.

I agree.  Attempting to tax something in the name of saving the planet is as effective as constantly raising taxes on cigarettes to cut health care costs.  Instead of wasting our time and money in trying to collect taxes on free-floating gas in a way to decrease our desire to have beef, why not try to develop a process to collect the gas and use it as a source of fuel.  That would have a greater impact on helping the environment than taxes.
Logged
Stampever
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 489
« Reply #1 on: January 09, 2009, 03:18:18 PM »

I agree.  Attempting to tax something in the name of saving the planet is as effective as constantly raising taxes on cigarettes to cut health care costs.  Instead of wasting our time and money in trying to collect taxes on free-floating gas in a way to decrease our desire to have beef, why not try to develop a process to collect the gas and use it as a source of fuel.  That would have a greater impact on helping the environment than taxes.

You confuse the roles of the U.S. government and the private sector here. When an industrial activity produces a negative externality - a cost to society - it is the government's role to try to tax that industry so that it produces less, thus produces a smaller cost to society. It is the role of the private sector to come up with profit-making processes like the one you suggest.


And cigarette consumption has dropped dramatically in recent years. Higher taxes, along with other factors such as anti-tobacco campaigns, have had the effect of causing fewer people to smoke. That's the primary effect of taxing something.

Sorry, I wasn't implying that the government invent the technology.  Just saying that would have a better impact on the environment than the government taxing cattle.  While we (per individual) might eat less due to increase costs in meat, there will be more and more cattle each year due to the ever-growing population around the world.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 12 queries.