Obama's 2012 victory: Bigger or Smaller than Clinton 96? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 11:45:24 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  Obama's 2012 victory: Bigger or Smaller than Clinton 96? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Obama's 2012 victory: Bigger of Smaller than Clinton 96?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 39

Author Topic: Obama's 2012 victory: Bigger or Smaller than Clinton 96?  (Read 5419 times)
Nym90
nym90
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,260
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -2.96

P P P
« on: January 13, 2009, 12:25:05 AM »

I don't know this.  Nobody does.

It is simply my view that, since Obama's win in '08 was very substantial, given the extremely poor conditions for Republicans, that some of the traditionally Republican Presidential states will drift back to the fold come '12.

The same thing could well have been said about 1996 (or 1984, or 1972, or....). And indeed, a few traditionally GOP states that spurned Bush did come back into the Republican column in 1996 (Georgia, Montana, Colorado), though that didn't stop Clinton's victory margin from growing overall.
Logged
Nym90
nym90
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,260
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -2.96

P P P
« Reply #1 on: February 25, 2009, 02:56:55 PM »

The 1994 or even the 2002 versions of Romney would be excellent general election candidates, but would never get past a GOP primary. Conversely, the 2008 Romney could well win the primary, but barring Carter or Bush like approval numbers for Obama, is unelectable in the general.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 15 queries.