Obama's 2012 victory: Bigger or Smaller than Clinton 96? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 01, 2024, 12:34:03 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  Obama's 2012 victory: Bigger or Smaller than Clinton 96? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Obama's 2012 victory: Bigger of Smaller than Clinton 96?
#1
Yes		  
#2
No		  
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results
Total Voters: 39

Author Topic: Obama's 2012 victory: Bigger or Smaller than Clinton 96?  (Read 5424 times)
Reaganfan
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,236
United States


« on: January 13, 2009, 10:28:49 AM »
Quote from: General Secretary realisticidealist on January 13, 2009, 10:26:31 AM

In order for that to be true, Obama would both need to fail massively, and the Republicans would need to nominate a respectable candidate. Even if Obama does poorly, if the Republicans nominate Palin, Jindal, or Huckabee, Obama would be reelected, barring third party challengers on the left.

What about Romney?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 16 queries.