Obama's 2012 victory: Bigger or Smaller than Clinton 96? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 01, 2024, 04:45:23 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  Obama's 2012 victory: Bigger or Smaller than Clinton 96? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Obama's 2012 victory: Bigger of Smaller than Clinton 96?
#1
Yes		  
#2
No		  
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results
Total Voters: 39

Author Topic: Obama's 2012 victory: Bigger or Smaller than Clinton 96?  (Read 5436 times)
RIP Robert H Bork
officepark
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,030
Czech Republic


« on: January 12, 2009, 03:36:11 PM »
This question is nonsense, because Obama has yet to win in 2012.
Logged
RIP Robert H Bork
officepark
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,030
Czech Republic


« Reply #1 on: February 25, 2009, 05:36:49 PM »
Quote from: pbrower2a on February 25, 2009, 01:32:43 PM
Here's an Eisenhower-scale victory:



Obama picks up Montana, the Dakotas, Arizona (no Favorite Son Republican this year, and Arizona has more Latinos than Mormons in the electorate), Missouri, NE-01 (thanks to all the young Cornhuskers at the University of Nebraska), Georgia, and Texas (Latino vote and transplanted Yankees fleeing "Michigrim". and "Oh-I-Owe").   

Obama will win SC before TX. Plus, I think that Obama would win WV in this scenario.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 11 queries.