Another proposal for a Constitutional amendment
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 12:16:20 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Another proposal for a Constitutional amendment
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Another proposal for a Constitutional amendment  (Read 3998 times)
dubhdara
Rookie
**
Posts: 42


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: September 26, 2004, 04:46:11 PM »


I would like to propose that the first amendment, to wit:

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

be amended to read:

"Congress shall make no law."

I think it would really help out Wink

Dubhdara.




Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: September 26, 2004, 06:52:26 PM »

I second this amendment Smiley
Logged
Bono
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,699
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: September 27, 2004, 01:33:07 AM »

I third you!
Logged
Democratic Hawk
LucysBeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,703
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -2.58, S: 2.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: September 27, 2004, 05:22:26 AM »

Laws are necessary to enhance and protect civil society.

Dave
Logged
John Dibble
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,732
Japan


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: September 27, 2004, 06:41:32 AM »

Laws are necessary to enhance and protect civil society.

Dave

It's a joke. Lighten up. Besides, the states could still make laws. Wink
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: September 27, 2004, 07:40:53 AM »

How about the following amendment.

Amendment XXVIII
(1) The first through twenty-seventh amendment are hereby repealed.
(2) Articles I through VII are hereby repealed.
(3) Bush can do what he bloody well likes.
Logged
dubhdara
Rookie
**
Posts: 42


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: September 27, 2004, 11:51:55 AM »


Or how about this: The Bill of No Rights...

http://www.bigeye.com/billofno.htm

Dubhdara.
Logged
Bono
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,699
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: September 27, 2004, 12:56:55 PM »


Actually, I've read that before!
Are we soul mates or what? Wink Cheesy
Logged
dubhdara
Rookie
**
Posts: 42


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: September 27, 2004, 04:02:41 PM »


Actually, I've read that before!
Are we soul mates or what? Wink Cheesy

Highly unlikely, there are few with my political beliefs Wink

Dubhdara.

Logged
badnarikin04
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 888


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: September 27, 2004, 04:22:17 PM »

WOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!


How about this:

"Congress shall make no law. Instead, Congress shall allow 'crime periods' in length of 4 or 5 days in which everyone fights to the death and those who remain after these crime periods shall create new government until the next crime period"

Sounds great!
Logged
Bono
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,699
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: September 27, 2004, 04:29:04 PM »


Actually, I've read that before!
Are we soul mates or what? Wink Cheesy

Highly unlikely, there are few with my political beliefs Wink

Dubhdara.



I notice an ancapish tone on your posts.
Logged
dubhdara
Rookie
**
Posts: 42


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: September 28, 2004, 11:59:34 AM »

Is that an Americanism? Does it mean anti-capitalist?

Dubhdara.
Logged
Bono
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,699
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: September 28, 2004, 12:32:47 PM »

Is that an Americanism? Does it mean anti-capitalist?

Dubhdara.

Actually, it means anarcho-capitalism.
Logged
dubhdara
Rookie
**
Posts: 42


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: September 28, 2004, 04:08:59 PM »

Anarchic or anarchy in my country has a negative connotation - simply meaning chaos, total lack of government.

Although I believe the market should be free, I do believe government should exist to make sure of certain very basic things such as protecting life and property.

My basic view (very basic!) is summed up in the "Creed of Freedom" which can be found at http://www.freedomforceinternational.org


Dubhdara.
Logged
badnarikin04
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 888


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: September 28, 2004, 06:30:32 PM »

I hate it when people call Libertarians anarchists.

Closed minded b@stards.
Logged
Bono
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,699
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: September 29, 2004, 01:42:50 AM »

I hate it when people call Libertarians anarchists.

Closed minded b@stards.

Rothbard was a libertarian and an anarchist. So is David Friedman.
Logged
John Dibble
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,732
Japan


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: September 29, 2004, 06:41:14 AM »

I hate it when people call Libertarians anarchists.

Closed minded b@stards.

Rothbard was a libertarian and an anarchist. So is David Friedman.

I think he means in general. No doubt a few libertarians are really anarchists, but most aren't.
Logged
Beefalow and the Consumer
Beef
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,123
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.77, S: -8.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: September 30, 2004, 09:46:28 AM »

I hate it when people call Libertarians anarchists.

Closed minded b@stards.

Rothbard was a libertarian and an anarchist. So is David Friedman.

I think he means in general. No doubt a few libertarians are really anarchists, but most aren't.

I would categorize a good portion of the Republican party as being economic anarchists.
Logged
dubhdara
Rookie
**
Posts: 42


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: September 30, 2004, 10:33:13 AM »

I was very impressed with the Texas 2000 Constitution (1997/8 Convention):

http://www.wepin.com/public/tc203.html


As far as my ideal for a constitution of the u.s. is concerned I must go with:

http://www.joelskousen.com/Philosophy/constitution.html

Both of the above, in my opinion, contain the true spirit of liberty and the "pursuit of happiness".

Dubhdara.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.044 seconds with 11 queries.