Home
2012
Election Results
Election Info
Weblog
Wiki
Search
Email
Site Info
Store
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
June 20, 2013, 12:00:35 am
News:
Please delete your old personal messages.
Atlas Forum
Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
U.S. Presidential Election Results
(Moderator:
True Federalist
)
weakest VP choice?
« previous
next »
Pages:
[
1
]
2
Author
Topic: weakest VP choice? (Read 4830 times)
WalterMitty
YaBB God
Posts: 19003
Political Matrix
E: 1.68, S: -2.26
weakest VP choice?
«
on:
February 24, 2004, 09:22:03 pm »
excluding james stockdale, who has been the weakest VP choice in recent history (post 1952)?
id say jack kemp. he really didnt add anything, save annoying football metaphors. he wasnt picked to deliver a state. dole didnt need someone to bring 'experience' to the ticket. i suppose the reasoning of the kemp choice was to get the supply-siders lined up behind the dole candidacy. sure, the supply siders viewed dole as suspect, but im certain they would have voted for him over clinton without kemp being on the ticket.
as a republican, i can still remember how bad i felt when dole selected kemp.
Logged
Quote from: BushKenya on June 07, 2013, 09:42:11 pm
I did go to McDonald's because there was literally no time for anything else. No time to cook an honest meal.
Brutus
Jr. Member
Posts: 73
Re:weakest VP choice?
«
Reply #1 on:
February 24, 2004, 09:25:47 pm »
Kemp? What about Quayle?
Logged
"I do not belong to an organized political party. I'm a Democrat."
~ Will Rogers
migrendel
YaBB God
Posts: 1692
Re:weakest VP choice?
«
Reply #2 on:
February 24, 2004, 09:27:19 pm »
Dan Quayle. Had he not been born rich, he probably could have worked his way up to dishwasher, garbage collector, or dustman.
Logged
Economic Left/Right: -10.00
Social Left/Right: -10.00
Registered in Massachusetts as a Democrat for Fantasy Elections, though now living in Rome.
ilikeverin
YaBB God
Posts: 14807
Re:weakest VP choice?
«
Reply #3 on:
February 24, 2004, 09:31:56 pm »
Quote from: migrendel on February 24, 2004, 09:27:19 pm
Dan Quayle. Had he not been born rich, he probably could have worked his way up to dishwasher, garbage collector, or dustman.
Perhaps a potatoe farmer
Logged
Folk Representant of the Most Serene Republic of the Midwest, registered in the State of Joy, in Atlasia
Recognized National Treasure of Atlasia
WalterMitty
YaBB God
Posts: 19003
Political Matrix
E: 1.68, S: -2.26
Re:weakest VP choice?
«
Reply #4 on:
February 24, 2004, 09:33:48 pm »
im sure many folks will say quayle, but give him some credit, he was actually elected VP. ive never seen any evidence that he HURT bush's electoral chances.
dole was running a long shot campaign, he needed a home run (or at least a triple) with his VP choice, instead he struck out.
Logged
Quote from: BushKenya on June 07, 2013, 09:42:11 pm
I did go to McDonald's because there was literally no time for anything else. No time to cook an honest meal.
YRABNNRM
YoungRepub
YaBB God
Posts: 10868
Political Matrix
E: 0.90, S: -6.09
Re:weakest VP choice?
«
Reply #5 on:
February 24, 2004, 09:35:36 pm »
Geraldine Ferraro
Logged
Dave from Michigan
9iron768
YaBB God
Posts: 2995
Re:weakest VP choice?
«
Reply #6 on:
February 24, 2004, 09:42:21 pm »
what was Kemp's home state
Logged
WalterMitty
YaBB God
Posts: 19003
Political Matrix
E: 1.68, S: -2.26
Re:weakest VP choice?
«
Reply #7 on:
February 24, 2004, 09:58:52 pm »
new york was where he served in congress from. i think he moved to california after serving in the bush administration.
Logged
Quote from: BushKenya on June 07, 2013, 09:42:11 pm
I did go to McDonald's because there was literally no time for anything else. No time to cook an honest meal.
nclib
YaBB God
Posts: 8511
Re:weakest VP choice?
«
Reply #8 on:
February 24, 2004, 10:24:42 pm »
He certainly didn't help in New York--I think Clinton won every single congressional district in New York state in '96.
Logged
[George W. Bush] has shattered the myth of white supremacy once and for all. -- Congressman Charles Rangel (D-NY)
"George Bush supports abstinence. Lucky Laura."
- sign seen at the March for Women's Lives, 4/25/04
elcorazon
YaBB God
Posts: 2223
Re:weakest VP choice?
«
Reply #9 on:
February 24, 2004, 11:47:07 pm »
Lieberman was a very poor choice politically. Quayle was a horrible choice to actually be the veep. Kemp was also a poor selection. Cheney was the scariest. Dubya would be wise to dump him. I still think he will dump him around the time of the convention, claiming health reasons.
Logged
"The most important thing to remember is, no matter what anybody tells you, it is never, ever unpatriotic or un-American to question anything in a democracy"
12th Doctor
supersoulty
Moderators
YaBB God
Posts: 20864
Political Matrix
E: 1.38, S: -1.74
Re:weakest VP choice?
«
Reply #10 on:
February 25, 2004, 12:02:32 am »
Ferraro. She just wasn't ready for prime-time yet. Same with Quayle.
Logged
Click for Old Profile Pic
WalterMitty
YaBB God
Posts: 19003
Political Matrix
E: 1.68, S: -2.26
Re:weakest VP choice?
«
Reply #11 on:
February 25, 2004, 09:11:26 am »
im surprised that only one person mentioned eagleton. perhaps people overlook him because mcgovern himself was a weak candidate.
im not sure if i agree witht eh spiro agnew assessment. he did turn out to be a failure while he was in office. as governor of maryland, however, he had a very moderate, pro civil rights record. it was only while he was VP that he turned into a right wing nut, for lack of a better term.
Logged
Quote from: BushKenya on June 07, 2013, 09:42:11 pm
I did go to McDonald's because there was literally no time for anything else. No time to cook an honest meal.
Huckleberry Finn
Finn
YaBB God
Posts: 1831
Re:weakest VP choice?
«
Reply #12 on:
February 25, 2004, 09:26:52 am »
Ferraro, Quayle, Kemp, Lieberman all bad!
George Bush was last good choice.
Logged
I live in Finland. I vote Conservatives (National Coalition Party) in Finnish elections, but consider myself as moderate Democrat in the USA.
In New York for the purpose of Fantasy Elections.
elcorazon
YaBB God
Posts: 2223
Re:weakest VP choice?
«
Reply #13 on:
February 25, 2004, 10:10:09 am »
Quote from: Huckleberry Finn on February 25, 2004, 09:26:52 am
Ferraro, Quayle, Kemp, Lieberman all bad!
George Bush was last good choice.
You left out Gore. He was a decent choice because Clinton was at the head of the ticket, although he'd be a horrible choice for a Kerry type at the top of the ticket, politically anyway. I do agree that Bush Sr. was a good choice.
Logged
"The most important thing to remember is, no matter what anybody tells you, it is never, ever unpatriotic or un-American to question anything in a democracy"
Nym90
nym90
Modadmin
YaBB God
Posts: 15120
Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -2.96
Re:weakest VP choice?
«
Reply #14 on:
February 25, 2004, 03:23:24 pm »
Kemp's home state was still New York at the time of the 1996 election.
Logged
12th Doctor
supersoulty
Moderators
YaBB God
Posts: 20864
Political Matrix
E: 1.38, S: -1.74
Re:weakest VP choice?
«
Reply #15 on:
February 25, 2004, 03:45:46 pm »
I don't think that Liebermann was a poor chioce. HELL I would have rather have seen him at the top of the ticket in 2000. Cheney was not a horrible chioce. The media kept complaining that Bush nedded 'gravitas' (funny, my Poli Sci professor Dr. Kozac has been studying politics for 35 years, he's been to 8 conventions, was a congressional fellow, personaly knows Dick Cheney, Sen. Fred Harris and several other, co-authored a book with Ken Duberstien (Reagan's chief of staff) and taught at the National War College (he taught Wes Clark), West Point and the Air Force Achademy (he was a Col. in the Air force) and he said that he had never even heard of 'gravitas before the 2000 election) so Cheney was almost a nessesity. I think that it would be a bad idea ot keep him on for '04 however.
Logged
Click for Old Profile Pic
Bleeding heart conservative, HTMLdon
htmldon
YaBB God
Posts: 8816
Political Matrix
E: 1.03, S: -2.26
Re:weakest VP choice?
«
Reply #16 on:
February 25, 2004, 05:27:51 pm »
Back up the train a moment, Kemp was the best Vice-Presidential choice EVER. The ticket should have been reversed and should have been a Kemp-Dole ticket but with Liddy as the VP. Jack Kemp is one of the few white Republicans who can get a decent audience with African-Americans. He is one of my favorite politicians and one whom I most admire and respect. There would be no better President or Vice-President than Jack Kemp.
Logged
© Tweed the Younger
Miamiu1027
YaBB God
Posts: 34381
Re:weakest VP choice?
«
Reply #17 on:
February 25, 2004, 05:54:23 pm »
Ferraro, Quayle, Kemp, and Stockdale all bad.
Logged
"If the Constitution means anything, it surely means that the president does not have unreviewable authority to summarily execute any American whom he concludes is an enemy of the state"
registered somewhere in Georgia AFE
Michael Z
Mike
YaBB God
Posts: 4348
Political Matrix
E: -5.88, S: -4.72
Re:weakest VP choice?
«
Reply #18 on:
February 25, 2004, 06:37:41 pm »
Ferraro or Quayle.
Logged
Huckleberry Finn
Finn
YaBB God
Posts: 1831
Re:weakest VP choice?
«
Reply #19 on:
February 29, 2004, 04:39:10 pm »
Quote from: elcorazon on February 25, 2004, 10:10:09 am
Quote from: Huckleberry Finn on February 25, 2004, 09:26:52 am
Ferraro, Quayle, Kemp, Lieberman all bad!
George Bush was last good choice.
You left out Gore. He was a decent choice because Clinton was at the head of the ticket, although he'd be a horrible choice for a Kerry type at the top of the ticket, politically anyway. I do agree that Bush Sr. was a good choice.
You're right. I forgot Gore. He was good one.
Logged
I live in Finland. I vote Conservatives (National Coalition Party) in Finnish elections, but consider myself as moderate Democrat in the USA.
In New York for the purpose of Fantasy Elections.
Gustaf
Moderators
YaBB God
Posts: 26149
Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70
Re:weakest VP choice?
«
Reply #20 on:
February 29, 2004, 05:26:49 pm »
So many names, so many names...I guess I agree with all the above, basically. What about Lloyd Bentsen in 1988? I don't know much about the guy, other than that he failed MISERABLY in his presidential bid in 1976 and did NOT deliver Texas to Dukakis!
Logged
Quote from: The Pauper of the Surf and the Jester of Tortuga on July 14, 2011, 01:20:59 am
This place really has become a cesspool of degenerate whores...
Economic score: +0.9
Social score: -2.61
In MN for fantasy stuff, member of the most recently dissolved centrist party.
Kghadial
Full Member
Posts: 224
Re:weakest VP choice?
«
Reply #21 on:
March 02, 2004, 02:33:59 am »
I think the worst to VP choices would probably be the two who cost the ticket the election.
Bob Dole probably cost Ford the election because mondale beat him soundly in the debate (at least that is what i heard). People were kinda uncomfortable with him being the number two guy during a time when the republican party was so scandal filled (Agnew and Nixon had to resign FOR COMPLETELY DIFFERENT REASONS).
A slightly better choice but still bad would be Lieberman. If Gore had picked Graham of Florida, we would be currently picking a republican challenger to president gore. I personally think that the 'confederate flag flyers' that Dean talked about probably couldn't swallow a Jewish man as Vice-President and most of them who might have though about voting for Gore did not. And if just 1000 of such souls voting for Gore in Florida would make him president.
Logged
Canada? Only if they start drafting people
Gustaf
Moderators
YaBB God
Posts: 26149
Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70
Re:weakest VP choice?
«
Reply #22 on:
March 02, 2004, 02:17:19 pm »
Quote from: Kghadial on March 02, 2004, 02:33:59 am
I think the worst to VP choices would probably be the two who cost the ticket the election.
Bob Dole probably cost Ford the election because mondale beat him soundly in the debate (at least that is what i heard). People were kinda uncomfortable with him being the number two guy during a time when the republican party was so scandal filled (Agnew and Nixon had to resign FOR COMPLETELY DIFFERENT REASONS).
A slightly better choice but still bad would be Lieberman. If Gore had picked Graham of Florida, we would be currently picking a republican challenger to president gore. I personally think that the 'confederate flag flyers' that Dean talked about probably couldn't swallow a Jewish man as Vice-President and most of them who might have though about voting for Gore did not. And if just 1000 of such souls voting for Gore in Florida would make him president.
The guy who's name begins with an 'E', the original McGovern pick, was prettu bad....even though McGovern would probably have lost anyway...
Logged
Quote from: The Pauper of the Surf and the Jester of Tortuga on July 14, 2011, 01:20:59 am
This place really has become a cesspool of degenerate whores...
Economic score: +0.9
Social score: -2.61
In MN for fantasy stuff, member of the most recently dissolved centrist party.
Kghadial
Full Member
Posts: 224
Re:weakest VP choice?
«
Reply #23 on:
March 02, 2004, 04:52:49 pm »
Quote from: Gustaf on March 02, 2004, 02:17:19 pm
Quote from: Kghadial on March 02, 2004, 02:33:59 am
I think the worst to VP choices would probably be the two who cost the ticket the election.
Bob Dole probably cost Ford the election because mondale beat him soundly in the debate (at least that is what i heard). People were kinda uncomfortable with him being the number two guy during a time when the republican party was so scandal filled (Agnew and Nixon had to resign FOR COMPLETELY DIFFERENT REASONS).
A slightly better choice but still bad would be Lieberman. If Gore had picked Graham of Florida, we would be currently picking a republican challenger to president gore. I personally think that the 'confederate flag flyers' that Dean talked about probably couldn't swallow a Jewish man as Vice-President and most of them who might have though about voting for Gore did not. And if just 1000 of such souls voting for Gore in Florida would make him president.
The guy who's name begins with an 'E', the original McGovern pick, was prettu bad....even though McGovern would probably have lost anyway...
There are worse men picked to be vice president; men that should never be president. However when the man at the top doesn't have a chance it doesn't matter, to a degree, who he picks as his running mate. No one cares who Nader's running mate was in 2000 or who it will be in 2004 since there is no chance that Nader will become president. But Ford and Gore as stand alone men had over a 50% of election. So it context their choice of a running mate who is much much worse because the running mate hurt them enough to cause them to lose.
Logged
Canada? Only if they start drafting people
Gustaf
Moderators
YaBB God
Posts: 26149
Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70
Re:weakest VP choice?
«
Reply #24 on:
March 02, 2004, 04:57:54 pm »
Quote from: Kghadial on March 02, 2004, 04:52:49 pm
Quote from: Gustaf on March 02, 2004, 02:17:19 pm
Quote from: Kghadial on March 02, 2004, 02:33:59 am
I think the worst to VP choices would probably be the two who cost the ticket the election.
Bob Dole probably cost Ford the election because mondale beat him soundly in the debate (at least that is what i heard). People were kinda uncomfortable with him being the number two guy during a time when the republican party was so scandal filled (Agnew and Nixon had to resign FOR COMPLETELY DIFFERENT REASONS).
A slightly better choice but still bad would be Lieberman. If Gore had picked Graham of Florida, we would be currently picking a republican challenger to president gore. I personally think that the 'confederate flag flyers' that Dean talked about probably couldn't swallow a Jewish man as Vice-President and most of them who might have though about voting for Gore did not. And if just 1000 of such souls voting for Gore in Florida would make him president.
The guy who's name begins with an 'E', the original McGovern pick, was prettu bad....even though McGovern would probably have lost anyway...
There are worse men picked to be vice president; men that should never be president. However when the man at the top doesn't have a chance it doesn't matter, to a degree, who he picks as his running mate. No one cares who Nader's running mate was in 2000 or who it will be in 2004 since there is no chance that Nader will become president. But Ford and Gore as stand alone men had over a 50% of election. So it context their choice of a running mate who is much much worse because the running mate hurt them enough to cause them to lose.
Yeah, I realize that, I just felt the need to say something original on this thread...
Logged
Quote from: The Pauper of the Surf and the Jester of Tortuga on July 14, 2011, 01:20:59 am
This place really has become a cesspool of degenerate whores...
Economic score: +0.9
Social score: -2.61
In MN for fantasy stuff, member of the most recently dissolved centrist party.
Pages:
[
1
]
2
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> 2016 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2000 U.S. Presidential Election Results
=> Presidential Election Trends
=> Election What-ifs?
===> Past Election What-ifs (US)
===> Alternative Elections
===> International What-ifs
-----------------------------
Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Gubernatorial/Statewide Elections
===> 2013 & Odd Year Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2014 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> Congressional Elections
===> 2014 Senatorial Election Polls
=> International Elections
=> Election Predictions
-----------------------------
Questions and Answers
-----------------------------
=> Presidential Election Process
===> Electoral Reform
===> Polling
=> The Atlas
===> How To
-----------------------------
General Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Constitution and Law
=> Religion & Philosophy
=> History
===> Alternative History
-----------------------------
General Politics
-----------------------------
=> U.S. General Discussion
=> Political Geography & Demographics
=> International General Discussion
=> Economics
=> Individual Politics
=> Political Debate
===> Political Essays & Deliberation
===> Book Reviews and Discussion
-----------------------------
Election Archive
-----------------------------
=> 2012 Elections
===> 2012 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2012 House Election Polls
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2012 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> 2010 Elections
===> 2010 House Election Polls
===> 2010 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2010 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> 2008 Elections
===> 2008 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2008 Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Polls
=> 2006 Elections
===> 2006 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2006 Gubernatorial Election Polls
-----------------------------
Forum Community
-----------------------------
=> Forum Community
===> Forum Community Election Match-ups
=> Election and History Games
===> Mock Parliment
===> Town Hall
===> Survivor
===> Interactive Timelines
=> Off-topic Board
-----------------------------
Atlas Fantasy Elections
-----------------------------
=> Atlas Fantasy Elections
===> Voting Booth
=> Atlas Fantasy Government
===> Constitutional Convention
===> Regional Governments
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Powered by SMF 1.1.18
|
SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Loading...