Are you guys blaming Bush and the Republicans for spending on 9/11 recovery, Afghanistan, Katrina recovery, and Wall Street bailouts? I'm curious to know how many Democrats opposed him on those expenses.
I opposed both the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts. Katrina was a gnat economically. By the time the Wall Street bailouts became an issue, it was far, far too late. To be fair, the bubble started in the second half of the Clinton administration; if Greenspan and Bush had allowed an ordinary correction, we would have had a medium-sized recession somewhere between the severity of the 1991 recession (light), and the 1982 recession. Of course that would have meant some Republican losses in the 2002 off-year cycle, and a more difficult re-election for Bush in 2004. The problem with modern democracies is that the needs of tommorrow's election, combined with the limited lifespan of our CEO's and bureaucrats, guarantees economic policy directly primarily toward the short term.