Top 25 Fattest and Fittest cities (suck it Miami!)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 04, 2024, 07:32:42 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Top 25 Fattest and Fittest cities (suck it Miami!)
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: Top 25 Fattest and Fittest cities (suck it Miami!)  (Read 2917 times)
dead0man
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,402
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: January 27, 2009, 02:08:36 AM »

Top Fittest Cities

1. Salt Lake City, UT
2. Colorado Springs, CO
3. Minneapolis, MN
4. Denver, CO
5. Albuquerque, NM
6. Portland, OR
7. Honolulu, HI
8. Seattle, WA
9. Omaha, NE
10. Virginia Beach, VA
11. Milwaukee, WI
12. San Francisco, CA
13. Tucson, AZ
14. Boston, MA
15. Cleveland, OH
16. St. Louis, MO
17. Austin, TX
18. Washington, DC
19. Sacramento, CA
20. Oakland, CA
21. Atlanta, GA
22. Fresno, CA
23. Tampa, FL
24. Nashville-Davidson, TN
25. Pittsburgh, PA

Top Fattest Cities

1. Miami, FL
2. Oklahoma City, OK
3. San Antonio, TX
4. Las Vegas, NV
5. New York, NY
6. Houston, TX
7. El Paso, TX
8. Jacksonville, FL
9. Charlotte, NC
10. Louisville-Jefferson, KY
11. Memphis, TN
12. Detroit, MI
13. Chicago, IL
14. Dallas-Fort Worth, TX
15. San Jose, CA
16. Tulsa, OK
17. Baltimore, MD
18. Columbus, OH
19. Raleigh, NC
20. Philadelphia, PA
21. L.A.-Long Beach, CA
22. Phoenix-Mesa, AZ
23. Indianapolis, IN
24. San Diego, CA
25. Kansas City, MO
Logged
Lunar
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,404
Ireland, Republic of
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: January 27, 2009, 02:12:19 AM »

I once saw a list with San Francisco as #1, probably due to Hipsters and Aisnas,
Logged
memphis
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,959


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: January 27, 2009, 02:14:12 AM »

I'm really shocked to see Milwaukee on the fit list given their culture of beer brats and cheese.
Logged
Aizen
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,510


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -9.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: January 27, 2009, 02:17:17 AM »

another list where colorado kicks ass imho
Logged
Associate Justice PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,179
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: January 27, 2009, 03:48:17 AM »

I once saw a list with San Francisco as #1, probably due to Hipsters and Aisnas,

     We also have a great public transportation system & at only 49 mi2, it's completely possible to live here without owning a car.
Logged
Lunar
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,404
Ireland, Republic of
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: January 27, 2009, 03:49:34 AM »

I once saw a list with San Francisco as #1, probably due to Hipsters and Aisnas,

     We also have a great public transportation system & at only 49 mi2, it's completely possible to live here without owning a car.

Yeah except BART is awful and only goes North-South (ignoring the fact that the BART police might shoot you while you're down)
Logged
Associate Justice PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,179
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: January 27, 2009, 03:59:00 AM »

I once saw a list with San Francisco as #1, probably due to Hipsters and Aisnas,

     We also have a great public transportation system & at only 49 mi2, it's completely possible to live here without owning a car.

Yeah except BART is awful and only goes North-South (ignoring the fact that the BART police might shoot you while you're down)

     I hate BART. Not only does it suck, but when I ride the bus home from work I pass two BART stations on the way & the people from the station all crowd onto the bus.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: January 27, 2009, 04:01:11 AM »

This list kind of weirds me out.  New York City is fat, but D.C. is skinny?
Logged
Lunar
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,404
Ireland, Republic of
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: January 27, 2009, 04:02:12 AM »

This list kind of weirds me out.  New York City is fat, but D.C. is skinny?

Demographically adjusted?
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: January 27, 2009, 04:07:27 AM »

This list kind of weirds me out.  New York City is fat, but D.C. is skinny?

Demographically adjusted?

If so that's pretty useless.

Minorities have poor diets and that gets adjusted away, but poor whites do too and that doesn't?

Miami is still perplexing me too.  Are Cubans way fatter than other Hispanics?  Are their whites really fat?  I mean, retired people tend to be.  Is this metropolitan area?

so many questions!
Logged
Lunar
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,404
Ireland, Republic of
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: January 27, 2009, 04:08:55 AM »

This list kind of weirds me out.  New York City is fat, but D.C. is skinny?

Demographically adjusted?

If so that's pretty useless.

Minorities have poor diets and that gets adjusted away, but poor whites do too and that doesn't?

Miami is still perplexing me too.  Are Cubans way fatter than other Hispanics?  Are their whites really fat?  I mean, retired people tend to be.  Is this metropolitan area?

so many questions!

Cubans must be fatter, see 5. Albuquerque, NM and various Colorado cities that would be brought down otherwise
Logged
dead0man
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,402
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: January 27, 2009, 04:34:43 AM »

The link I got went to a bad news story on the subject.  Here is the link to the study done by Men's Fitness.  The top 10 cities have a break down like this one:
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
and the rest just have the scorecard.
Logged
Lunar
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,404
Ireland, Republic of
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: January 27, 2009, 04:37:03 AM »

F+?
Logged
dead0man
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,402
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: January 27, 2009, 04:44:21 AM »

It's like "a little pregnant" I think.
Logged
Lunar
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,404
Ireland, Republic of
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: January 27, 2009, 04:48:09 AM »

I just think there are a very large number of Americans who wish High School would give F+'s should they actually exist

If we're giving schoolgrades for serious issues, it just seems weird.  Might as well give people "Z"'s and "A - + - "'s
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,998


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: January 27, 2009, 09:06:27 AM »

These lists are insane. The factors they're choosing must be distorting them. Any list that has St. Louis and Milwaukee under "fittest" and New York under "fattest" is cooking the books.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,768
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: January 27, 2009, 09:47:29 AM »

These lists are insane. The factors they're choosing must be distorting them. Any list that has St. Louis and Milwaukee under "fittest" and New York under "fattest" is cooking the books.

...in lard
Logged
dead0man
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,402
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: January 27, 2009, 10:17:49 AM »

These lists are insane. The factors they're choosing must be distorting them. Any list that has St. Louis and Milwaukee under "fittest" and New York under "fattest" is cooking the books.
You may be right.  Do you have any proof or just anecdotal?  I agree, the lists seem kind of...odd? at first glance and I'm sure the science isn't to MIT levels.
Logged
Bleeding heart conservative, HTMLdon
htmldon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,983
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.03, S: -2.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: January 27, 2009, 11:08:44 AM »

I am appalled.

Memphis is usually #1 on the perfectly plump list.  Now we're getting beat by 10 other contenders?  This is ridiculous.
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,956


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: January 27, 2009, 11:19:50 AM »

Nice. My two cities are 17th and 18th fittest.
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,998


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: January 27, 2009, 11:20:58 AM »

These lists are insane. The factors they're choosing must be distorting them. Any list that has St. Louis and Milwaukee under "fittest" and New York under "fattest" is cooking the books.
You may be right.  Do you have any proof or just anecdotal?  I agree, the lists seem kind of...odd? at first glance and I'm sure the science isn't to MIT levels.

Here's a chart on wikipedia that lists it by state.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obesity_in_the_United_States

That's not completely helpful for correlations to cities, however, they have identified trends with mass transit use (inverse) and income (also inverse) while some of the other factors that Men's Health have used (air quality?) do not correlate at all with "fatness."
Logged
Beefalow and the Consumer
Beef
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,123
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.77, S: -8.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: January 27, 2009, 01:08:41 PM »


WTF??
Logged
justfollowingtheelections
unempprof
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,766


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: January 27, 2009, 03:05:07 PM »

It's not a bad study but there are certain factors that they have ignored that make the results a bit misleading at least for certain cities.

Obesity is a problem in NY, but the small per capita number of health-food stores and gyms is because the population is concentrated in such a small area so there's no need for more.  There are two gyms within a walking distance from my apartment.  The lack of health-food stores is a problem outside Manhattan, but not as big as the study makes it sound because of the reasons I mentioned above.

I'm not surprised Charlotte is on the list of not-so-fit cities.  I've seen more obese people there than anywhere else.  BTW I'm really not sure how the existence of parks contributes to a person's fitness.
Logged
Associate Justice PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,179
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: January 27, 2009, 03:48:11 PM »

These lists are insane. The factors they're choosing must be distorting them. Any list that has St. Louis and Milwaukee under "fittest" and New York under "fattest" is cooking the books.
You may be right.  Do you have any proof or just anecdotal?  I agree, the lists seem kind of...odd? at first glance and I'm sure the science isn't to MIT levels.

     The weird thing is that primarily black cities appear to be much, much fitter than primarily hispanic ones according to this list, though I'm not exactly sure why that would be the case.
Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: January 27, 2009, 06:06:33 PM »

These lists vary wildly from year to year. They're complete and utter bullsh*t.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.047 seconds with 11 queries.