Is Woodrow Wilson to blame for neoconservatism?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 18, 2024, 10:02:55 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Is Woodrow Wilson to blame for neoconservatism?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Is Woodrow Wilson to blame for neoconservatism?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 30

Author Topic: Is Woodrow Wilson to blame for neoconservatism?  (Read 2338 times)
they don't love you like i love you
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 112,936
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: January 29, 2009, 01:37:18 AM »

Is Woodrow Wilson to blame for neoconservatism?
Logged
Nixon in '80
nixon1980
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,308
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.84, S: -5.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: January 29, 2009, 01:52:09 AM »

No, not really.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,671
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: January 29, 2009, 05:01:47 AM »

You're in the right general period, but you've picked the wrong politician.

Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: January 29, 2009, 08:58:08 AM »

Trotsky wasn't a politician.  that's one of the reasons why he lost.
Logged
Kaine for Senate '18
benconstine
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,329
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: January 29, 2009, 09:18:07 AM »

No, of course not.  Wilson's ideals were followed by liberals for decades, and some liberals still hold his views.  Eve neocons seem not to cite Wilson as an influence; Scoop Jackson is a more likely founder of neoconservatism than Wilson.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,671
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: January 29, 2009, 09:19:27 AM »

Trotsky wasn't a politician.  that's one of the reasons why he lost.

Heh. No, he was certainly a politician. A very bad one as it happens. That's one of the reasons why he lost.

Grin
Logged
Matt Damon™
donut4mccain
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,466
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: January 29, 2009, 09:21:48 AM »

Yes.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: January 29, 2009, 09:47:15 AM »

Woodrow Wilson Guthrie is not to blame for anything.
Logged
Mint
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,566
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: January 29, 2009, 09:55:37 AM »

To an extent yes. Wilsonianism did after all stress the importance of spreading democracy. Although Wilson did support internationalism in a way that neo-Cons fundamentally do not. I'd cite Hegel, Trotsky, Strauss, etc. as much more influential figures.
Logged
Daniel Adams
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,424
Georgia


Political Matrix
E: 9.03, S: 2.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: January 29, 2009, 10:50:46 AM »

To an extent yes. Wilsonianism did after all stress the importance of spreading democracy. Although Wilson did support internationalism in a way that neo-Cons fundamentally do not. I'd cite Hegel, Trotsky, Strauss, etc. as much more influential figures.
This is correct. Wilson was an extremely limited influence on neoconservatism. He's certainly not "to blame" for it.
Logged
k-onmmunist
Winston Disraeli
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,753
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: January 29, 2009, 11:33:03 AM »

No.
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,919


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: January 29, 2009, 11:38:54 AM »

He influenced it, just as he influenced modern liberal foreign policy.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,458
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: January 29, 2009, 02:16:44 PM »

partly
Logged
bullmoose88
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,515


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: January 29, 2009, 03:28:48 PM »

Using a but for test, its hard to think that without Woodrow Wilson, Neoconservativism fails to make an appearance.

But he helped.

My answer though: No.
Logged
SPC
Chuck Hagel 08
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,003
Latvia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: January 30, 2009, 10:34:59 AM »

You're in the right general period, but you've picked the wrong politician.


Logged
Psychic Octopus
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,948
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: January 31, 2009, 12:03:18 AM »

To an extent yes. Wilsonianism did after all stress the importance of spreading democracy. Although Wilson did support internationalism in a way that neo-Cons fundamentally do not. I'd cite Hegel, Trotsky, Strauss, etc. as much more influential figures.
Logged
RosettaStoned
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,154
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.45, S: -5.91

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: January 31, 2009, 12:34:47 AM »

How the hell can you blame Trotsky for neoconservatism?
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: January 31, 2009, 12:35:56 AM »

How the hell can you blame Trotsky for neoconservatism?

world revolution/internationalism... some prominent neocons (such as Hitchens) are former Trotskyists
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,671
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: January 31, 2009, 07:04:56 AM »

How the hell can you blame Trotsky for neoconservatism?

Because Neoconservatism (or a great deal of it) grew out of [American] Trotskyism?
Logged
Daniel Adams
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,424
Georgia


Political Matrix
E: 9.03, S: 2.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: January 31, 2009, 02:12:50 PM »

How the hell can you blame Trotsky for neoconservatism?

world revolution/internationalism... some prominent neocons (such as Hitchens) are former Trotskyists
I find that part of the argument amazingly stupid. Several prominent conservatives (such as Whittaker Chambers) were former communists, but would anybody seriously claim modern American conservatism grew out of communism?
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,919


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: January 31, 2009, 06:54:53 PM »

How the hell can you blame Trotsky for neoconservatism?

Because Neoconservatism (or a great deal of it) grew out of [American] Trotskyism?
Of course, what neoconservatives want to spread at the barrel of a gun and what Trotskyists wanted to spread at the barrel of a gun are very different.
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: February 01, 2009, 04:13:08 AM »

No
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.039 seconds with 13 queries.