Is Woodrow Wilson to blame for neoconservatism? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 01, 2024, 12:36:13 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Is Woodrow Wilson to blame for neoconservatism? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Is Woodrow Wilson to blame for neoconservatism?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 30

Author Topic: Is Woodrow Wilson to blame for neoconservatism?  (Read 2365 times)
Daniel Adams
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,424
Georgia


Political Matrix
E: 9.03, S: 2.43

« on: January 29, 2009, 10:50:46 AM »

To an extent yes. Wilsonianism did after all stress the importance of spreading democracy. Although Wilson did support internationalism in a way that neo-Cons fundamentally do not. I'd cite Hegel, Trotsky, Strauss, etc. as much more influential figures.
This is correct. Wilson was an extremely limited influence on neoconservatism. He's certainly not "to blame" for it.
Logged
Daniel Adams
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,424
Georgia


Political Matrix
E: 9.03, S: 2.43

« Reply #1 on: January 31, 2009, 02:12:50 PM »

How the hell can you blame Trotsky for neoconservatism?

world revolution/internationalism... some prominent neocons (such as Hitchens) are former Trotskyists
I find that part of the argument amazingly stupid. Several prominent conservatives (such as Whittaker Chambers) were former communists, but would anybody seriously claim modern American conservatism grew out of communism?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 14 queries.