Is this too controversial of a title for my column?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 10:00:11 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Forum Community
  Forum Community (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, YE, KoopaDaQuick 🇵🇸)
  Is this too controversial of a title for my column?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: I'm doing my newpaper column this week on Guantanamo, and I want to name it "We gotta Gitmo Prisons".  Does that cross a line?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 17

Author Topic: Is this too controversial of a title for my column?  (Read 866 times)
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: February 10, 2009, 02:00:28 AM »

Let me know.
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,156
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: February 10, 2009, 02:10:21 AM »

Depends on what's in the column
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: February 10, 2009, 02:13:11 AM »


The fact that I don't think closing Guantanamo really gets anything done.  All we really need to do is ensure that human rights are restored.  Closing it only means we have find more prison space in an already overcrowded system.
Logged
Nixon in '80
nixon1980
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,308
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.84, S: -5.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: February 10, 2009, 02:28:32 AM »

Haha, that's pretty clever...

it's the teensiest bit offensive, I think adding a "'ve" to "we" helps a little bit...

"We've gotta Gitmo Prisons"

I don't know why, it just does.
Logged
Smid
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,151
Australia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: February 10, 2009, 07:39:59 AM »

I voted in favour of you using the title. I think it's witty. Demmed witty, as Sir Percy Blakeney might say.
Logged
7,052,770
Harry
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,421
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: February 10, 2009, 08:20:47 AM »

no one's really going to be offended, but some lame people will probably claim to be.
Logged
Reaganfan
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,236
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: February 10, 2009, 08:29:49 AM »

Have you no heart, Inks? How DARE you insult prisoners like that?
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: February 10, 2009, 08:50:32 AM »

It crosses the line between mere dumbness and stark inanity, but that's not illegal.
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: February 10, 2009, 12:24:18 PM »

It crosses the line between mere dumbness and stark inanity, but that's not illegal.


Ouch.  Tongue
Logged
The Mikado
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,773


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: February 10, 2009, 12:55:37 PM »

Controversy attracts eyeballs.  I'm not sure what you're worried about.
Logged
Јas
Jas
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,705
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: February 11, 2009, 08:29:37 AM »

I don't see why the title would be controversial.
Logged
MasterJedi
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,652
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: February 11, 2009, 02:37:27 PM »

I don't see why the title would be controversial.

Exactly, and if somebody cares about it you should just ignore them, they'll be in the very small minority.
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: February 11, 2009, 09:08:22 PM »

I decided to go with it and use the title.  On a completely unrelated note, that column got bumped to Friday's edition of the paper so that they could make room for an editorial about Bob Saget.
Logged
Sensei
senseiofj324
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,532
Panama


Political Matrix
E: -2.45, S: -5.57

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: February 11, 2009, 09:23:02 PM »

I decided to go with it and use the title.  On a completely unrelated note, that column got bumped to Friday's edition of the paper so that they could make room for an editorial about Bob Saget.
ouch

You should quit if you get bumped off for Dave Coulier on the Friday edition.
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: February 13, 2009, 01:24:58 AM »

So, they changed it to "Git-mo prisons".  I feel like that loses so much of the wittyness that mine had, and I doubt many people will get the play on words that "We've gotta Gitmo prisons" had.  Oh well.
Logged
Smid
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,151
Australia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: February 13, 2009, 02:46:26 AM »

So, they changed it to "Git-mo prisons".  I feel like that loses so much of the wittyness that mine had, and I doubt many people will get the play on words that "We've gotta Gitmo prisons" had.  Oh well.

Still a good title, but I like yours better.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.044 seconds with 13 queries.