Is evolution part of science?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 24, 2024, 10:32:28 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Is evolution part of science?
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3]
Poll
Question: Is evolution part of science?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 50

Author Topic: Is evolution part of science?  (Read 7137 times)
Earth
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,548


Political Matrix
E: -9.61, S: -9.83

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #50 on: March 01, 2009, 08:19:05 PM »


God wrote the Bible, so everything in the Bible is "science."

Smiley
Logged
12th Doctor
supersoulty
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,584
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #51 on: March 02, 2009, 01:54:26 AM »
« Edited: March 02, 2009, 01:59:27 AM by Supersoulty »

Micro-evolution is proven beyond a shadow of any doubt what so ever.  It has been observed.  Bottom line.  From there, macro-evolution is just a series of micro-evolutions.  I really don't see where the debate is, here.

I think part of the problem is that people can see the changes that happen in their own lifetimes, but still deny macro-evolution because they simply cannot fathom how much how long a million years really is.  Just think about it... Homo Sapiens has been around for less than 1/5 of a million years, in its current form.
Logged
12th Doctor
supersoulty
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,584
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #52 on: March 02, 2009, 01:56:54 AM »

That is addressed to people who believe in Day-Age Creationism, of course.  There is no hope for people who believe in Young Earth Creationism.
Logged
dead0man
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,324
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #53 on: March 02, 2009, 06:38:31 AM »

There is no hope for people who believe in Young Earth Creationism.
That's not true.  Many people use to believe in it and have stopped.  If we stop trying to fix these people, we fail them.  There are many more that can be converted, we must continue to work them even if they are obstinate.  Sure, some will never see the light and it's fine to give up on individuals, but we must maintain the fight for the rest.
Logged
Earth
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,548


Political Matrix
E: -9.61, S: -9.83

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #54 on: March 02, 2009, 11:19:57 AM »

There is no hope for people who believe in Young Earth Creationism.
That's not true.  Many people use to believe in it and have stopped.  If we stop trying to fix these people, we fail them.  There are many more that can be converted, we must continue to work them even if they are obstinate.  Sure, some will never see the light and it's fine to give up on individuals, but we must maintain the fight for the rest.

Proselytize on behalf of science? Seems very pointless. If one chooses not to believe, fine; what does it matter? 
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,859
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #55 on: March 16, 2009, 05:03:28 PM »

Creationism is pseudo-intellectual junk in the same category as astrology.

Genetics, embryology, and the fossil record all attest to evolution. If you don't believe that formal change in life can happen without the Will of God, then look at... DOGS! We have dogs that look much like alligators (dachshunds), lions (terriers -- and their behavior is very much like that of Big Cats),  sheep (sheepdogs), bears (spaniels), and even horses (Great Danes). That comes from wolves, animals that most dogs resemble in shape -- let alone behavior. We have even been able to create dogs with suggestions of tiger markings. (Which fits -- considering what a dog becomes if it ever encounters a burglar).  If we can do that with one animal, then think what Nature can do with time and fortuitous accidents and natural selection -- like us.

Hint: we survive well enough around bears, big cats, hyenas, and large canids (including some of the domesticated ones that have the tools and appetites with which to eat us -- their choice and our persuasion). We would have never survived in the presence of T. Rex; neither could tigers.

Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 14 queries.