The Institute of 2012 GOP nomination Intrade rankings (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 04:23:24 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  The Institute of 2012 GOP nomination Intrade rankings (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: The Institute of 2012 GOP nomination Intrade rankings  (Read 201727 times)
Zarn
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,820


« on: May 16, 2009, 12:51:19 AM »

Romney always does well on Intrade...

Doesn't help him.
Logged
Zarn
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,820


« Reply #1 on: October 12, 2011, 12:42:56 PM »

Wow, Paul is finally ahead of Hunstman...

Gingrich should also be ahead of him.
Logged
Zarn
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,820


« Reply #2 on: November 03, 2011, 01:07:21 PM »

Whoa, I got to go visit Intrade and buy me some Cain.

Buying a black man? Have you no shame?

Anyway, Newt can have November, if Paul can have December. Tongue

Funny thing is, it seems every Paul supporter and their moms saw the Newt surge coming. Well maybe not their moms.
Logged
Zarn
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,820


« Reply #3 on: November 11, 2011, 11:05:00 AM »

Those three are going to be top 3 come Christmas, although Cain and Perry might work their way back in throughout that time.

And if I'm wrong, do you really want to call a guy out on Christmas? Wink
Logged
Zarn
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,820


« Reply #4 on: November 11, 2011, 11:45:37 AM »

A question that begs to be asked is this: has Intrade ever been right on anything?   Hillary at, what, something like 70% up until Iowa....and then they had Evan Bayh at 99% probability of being O's veep until the day before Biden was picked, when it was leaked that ole Joe had his grill cleaned.

It missed on Palin, as well.
Logged
Zarn
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,820


« Reply #5 on: December 09, 2011, 11:59:49 PM »

It's all about the electable status. He wins Iowa, and he becomes electable. Romney lost Iowa last time and became unelectable.
Logged
Zarn
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,820


« Reply #6 on: December 10, 2011, 10:24:15 AM »

It's all about the electable status. He wins Iowa, and he becomes electable. Romney lost Iowa last time and became unelectable.

I don't think you know what "electable" is.

You haven't been paying attention. I'll try to make it easy.

People say "Paul no electable!"

Paul win Iowa!

People say "Paul maybe electable. We vote Paul."
Logged
Zarn
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,820


« Reply #7 on: January 19, 2012, 11:14:11 PM »

Daniels was the guy I initially supported. Daniels beating out Santorum would be great.
Logged
Zarn
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,820


« Reply #8 on: January 19, 2012, 11:18:45 PM »

I do enjoy the Daniels talk in this thread. "Ah, yes, if he jumped in and beat Santorum, that would be excellent! Then Santorum's a real loser!" Keep moving those goal posts.

I wouldn't say a loser... more like an ass. His attitude has been terrible lately.
Logged
Zarn
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,820


« Reply #9 on: January 19, 2012, 11:23:42 PM »

Like the attitude or hate it, he's been almost exactly the same throughout the campaign. Now people have to actually include him in conversations as more than just an also ran. I think that's what irritates people the most.

No, he seemed a lot nicer before.
Logged
Zarn
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,820


« Reply #10 on: January 24, 2012, 01:56:49 PM »

It'd be funny if Santorum blew his remaining money running attack ads against Daniels this week.

Don't be silly, Jeb might make a run on him. He needs to keep Jeb down.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.036 seconds with 14 queries.