The Institute of 2012 GOP nomination Intrade rankings (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 01:36:53 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  The Institute of 2012 GOP nomination Intrade rankings (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: The Institute of 2012 GOP nomination Intrade rankings  (Read 201667 times)
RogueBeaver
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,058
Canada
« on: January 09, 2011, 03:16:56 PM »

Giffords happened to be on Palin's Obamacare "target list" with a crosshairs over her CD. Pure coincidence, but we all know what happened to Goldwater in '63.
Logged
RogueBeaver
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,058
Canada
« Reply #1 on: January 11, 2011, 08:20:40 PM »

This is all Giffords fallout presumably. Or is the realization that she isn't going to run starting to sink in? Mixture of the 2?
Logged
RogueBeaver
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,058
Canada
« Reply #2 on: March 04, 2011, 11:48:19 PM »

In retrospect, the fact that Giuliani was a media candidate with no base ("roof without a foundation") and that the Dems were desperate to toss their polarizing dynast under the bus, plus their history of bucking the frontrunner in favor of a promising dark horse, were ignored. Given that Romney isn't splitting his base with anyone like Hillary did with WWC voters in Iowa, like Barbour/Gingrich could well in the South, and Pawlenty/Gingrich/Barbour split the SoCon vote, I see no reason to doubt the heavy odds favouring a Romney nomination.
Logged
RogueBeaver
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,058
Canada
« Reply #3 on: March 11, 2011, 10:00:21 PM »

Then the obvious beneficiaries would be Gingrich or Barbour. Though IMO anyone who thinks Bachmann and Barbour have equal shots at the nomination, or that Pawlenty has a better chance than Gingrich, is either a) deluded b) forgot GOP primary dynamics c) both.
Logged
RogueBeaver
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,058
Canada
« Reply #4 on: July 03, 2011, 06:30:07 PM »

You don't need inside info to know that Perry is likely staying out.
Logged
RogueBeaver
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,058
Canada
« Reply #5 on: October 30, 2011, 10:27:14 PM »

At this rate, Cain might pass Perry... depending on how the SH stuff plays out.
Logged
RogueBeaver
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,058
Canada
« Reply #6 on: December 08, 2011, 02:47:35 PM »

Why are the 2 Shermanesques, Rubio and Christie, trading so high?
Logged
RogueBeaver
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,058
Canada
« Reply #7 on: December 08, 2011, 03:02:53 PM »

Why are the 2 Shermanesques, Rubio and Christie, trading so high?

No one believes denial of VP interest this early.  Once they actually refuse to be vetted, then it's time to actually believe them.


So we'll wait then. Interesting that Jon Kyl (who openly expressed interest) and Paul Ryan (who's left the door slightly ajar) aren't being traded though.
Logged
RogueBeaver
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,058
Canada
« Reply #8 on: December 13, 2011, 09:18:57 PM »

I doubt it's this.

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2011/12/13/key-gingrich-staff-member-departs-over-mormon-comment/
Logged
RogueBeaver
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,058
Canada
« Reply #9 on: December 14, 2011, 08:59:10 AM »

Gingrich tripled down on RWSE yesterday by calling the Roadmap "stupid." That's without mentioning already provoking George Will into taking Romney's side on the Bain thing.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.032 seconds with 14 queries.