A Liberal that did spend more money than Bush?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 07:21:24 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  A Liberal that did spend more money than Bush?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: A Liberal that did spend more money than Bush?  (Read 1274 times)
Silent Hunter
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,320
United Kingdom


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: September 30, 2004, 08:45:44 AM »
« edited: September 30, 2004, 10:12:18 AM by Silent Hunter »

You, must, must, take inflation and percentage of GDP into account.

Of course spending increases with population, because there's more people to look after and more taxes to do it.

Spending per person adjusted for inflation
http://oregonstate.edu/Dept/pol_sci/fac/sahr/percap92.htm

You can see that Clinton is slightly higher.

And by percentage of GDP:
http://carriedaway.blogs.com/carried_away/images/economics/u.S.%20Spending%20And%20Revenue%20In%20Relation%20To%20GDP.GIF

Note that Government spending drops under Bush, federal spending goes down, states go up.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 11 queries.