Rules

[ag]

As I am now the moderator here, just a few rules.

1. Any econ related messages are fine, be they Marxist, Austrian, or whatever other heresy you might think of

2. As follows from my previous remark, all sorts of judgemental statements about econ theories are also fine, as long as they don't become personally insulting.

2. Personal insults are not fine, and from this moment on will be deleted without warning.

[Senator MaxQue]

As I am now the moderator here, just a few rules.

1. Any econ related messages are fine, be they Marxist, Austrian, or whatever other heresy you might think of

2. As follows from my previous remark, all sorts of judgemental statements about econ theories are also fine, as long as they don't become personally insulting.

2. Personal insults are not fine, and from this moment on will be deleted without warning.

3 is after 2, not 2 is after 2.

[Inks.LWC Supports Chuck Hagel]

As I am now the moderator here, just a few rules.

1. Any econ related messages are fine, be they Marxist, Austrian, or whatever other heresy you might think of

2. As follows from my previous remark, all sorts of judgemental statements about econ theories are also fine, as long as they don't become personally insulting.

2. Personal insults are not fine, and from this moment on will be deleted without warning.

3 is after 2, not 2 is after 2.

Are you insulting the moderator's counting skills?

[dialectical fetishist]

Austrian

Yay!

[ag]

As I am now the moderator here, just a few rules.

1. Any econ related messages are fine, be they Marxist, Austrian, or whatever other heresy you might think of

2. As follows from my previous remark, all sorts of judgemental statements about econ theories are also fine, as long as they don't become personally insulting.

2. Personal insults are not fine, and from this moment on will be deleted without warning.

3 is after 2, not 2 is after 2.

Are you insulting the moderator's counting skills?

You know that there are three kinds of mathematicians? The ones who can count, and the ones who can't

[Derek]

As I am now the moderator here, just a few rules.

1. Any econ related messages are fine, be they Marxist, Austrian, or whatever other heresy you might think of

2. As follows from my previous remark, all sorts of judgemental statements about econ theories are also fine, as long as they don't become personally insulting.

2. Personal insults are not fine, and from this moment on will be deleted without warning.

3 is after 2, not 2 is after 2.

Are you insulting the moderator's counting skills?

You know that there are three kinds of mathematicians? The ones who can count, and the ones who can't

I've been saying that for thousands of generations. Oh man I must be in the latter category.

[ag]

Update on the rules. There've been complaints recently, that people cite copyrighted material in full, which would appear, at least to some, to be dubious. I am not a lawyer, nor am I an admirer of the copyright law in its current shape, but I'd rather not get into the interpretations of fair use and such. So, from now on, if you want to cite the entire text, please limit yourself to citing the first paragraph of any article, followed by a link. Of course, if you want to make a point about a particular passage, feel free to cite that passage, no matter where in the article it is. But avoid wholesale cut and paste.

If violations of this rule are reported to me, I will let the poster modify it first. If there is no modification within a reasonable period (say, 12 hours), I shall modify it myself.