Opinion of pbrower2a

[Kaine for Senate '18]

I'd say he's one of the best posters we've got.

[Keystone Phil]

I'd say he's one of the best posters we've got.

LOL

As I said elsewhere, he's a very long winded hack. Nothing more, nothing less.

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

Wow, I actually agree with Phil.

Reminds me of a less blatantly trollish Angry_Weasel. His calling Unitarian Universalists a liberal Christian denom is a great example.

[Franzl]

he's a very long winded hack. Nothing more, nothing less.

^^

[Psychic Octopus]

He is smart. But is nothing other then a Hack. A close-minded-die-hard-liberal-hack-who-will-never-agree-with-the-only-people-who-I-think-know-how-to-get-out-of-the-recession-but-also-got-us-into-it:

The Republicans.
EDIT:

And Evan Bayh and the Blue Dogs...

[Fmr. Pres. Duke]

Best posters we've got? All I've ever seen from him is long winded hack posts.

[© tweed]

I haven't noticed him

[Smid]

I've disagreed with him on a few points here and there, but he is excellent at analysis. I think he's a great poster.

[Associate Justice PiT]

     HP, like most Nietzsche haters.

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

This guy is actually starting to seem like a Democratic version of J. J.

[Raoul]

Wow, I guess the definition of hack has changed so much due to everyone on this forum's trigger-happy use of it.
That being said...
I look forward to his posts, where he backs up his arguments with well thought out analysis, maps, even the occasional joke or two.

If you guys have such a problem with his posting why don't you ever call him out on the threads he's posting on? Oh, that's right, because you would get destroyed arguing with him.

[Landslide Lyndon]

I've disagreed with him on a few points here and there, but he is excellent at analysis. I think he's a great poster.

[Hash]

Relatively smart, but still an awful hack. HP.

[Queen Mum Inks.LWC]

FF - why not.

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

My issues is the first time I saw him was some thread I wrote out pointing out to forum Republicans that posting about their heroes won't get them to run Angry_Weasel responded with a blatant bit of trolling and then he did with some crack about how Republicans believed in arranged marriages, aka more trolling.

[All Along The Watchtower]

I enjoy his posts. Excellent analysis.

Then again, I agree with him on most issues, so what do I know?

[Psychic Octopus]

It's actually very frustrating when a republican like me reads his posts. They are so good, I sometimes have to research and search it JUST to make sure that what I am saying is correct. But, I enjoy when he (although not often) posts on the Election What Ifs? Page. Very Detailed.

[Gustaf]

I'm not sure I know who he is. But I think he's an annoying hack.

[Nym90]

I certainly enjoy his posts and his eloquence. A bit hackish as times, of course, but still a very entertaining and informative read. Good election analyses even though they aren't perfect (whose are?).

[MasterJedi]

He's a hack, and was a big ass for taking over Josh's tl for awhile.

[RIP Robert H Bork]

Typical left wing drone.