September 30th Presidential Debate was a...

[DA]

in addition to those answers there is a second set of answers:

1)...helpful.
2)...not helpful.
------------------------------------------------------------
Why can't politicians be more like the guys in the first (9/06) debate? Badnarik and Cobb were very respectful and polite to each other during that debate. Why are the people in the public's eye acting like children and those that act with dignity only in the public's peripherial vision?
I choose F (which also happens to be the grade I give Bush and Kerry at debating). I also choose 1 (helpful), it reinforced my reasons to vote for Badnarik.

[Silent Hunter]

I said F, but can I put a write in for:

A reheat of everything we've heard for the last year and a half.

[bergie72]

The debate was a joke.   If was a 90-minute infomercial rehashing everything we've been hearing for months.  It would have been easier to have TV sets at the podiums with their respective commercials queued up to answer each question.

</ disgust > </ annoyance >

[© tweed]

I thought it was entertaining.

It was one of the first times John Kerry did not bore me.

[Democratic Hawk]

Well, I actually found it rather informative.

Dave

[DA]

Anyone else find it humorous that the responses consist of two Libertarians, two Brits, and only one American who identifies with a "major" party?