Home
2012
Election Results
Election Info
Weblog
Wiki
Search
Email
Site Info
Store
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
May 18, 2013, 11:20:52 am
News:
Cast your ballot in the 2012 Mock Election!
Atlas Forum
Atlas Fantasy Elections
Atlas Fantasy Government
Constitutional Convention
(Moderators:
Gustaf
,
MasterJedi
)
Parliamentary Bicameralism (Discussion Open)
« previous
next »
Pages:
1
...
5
6
7
8
9
[
10
]
11
12
13
14
15
...
19
Author
Topic: Parliamentary Bicameralism (Discussion Open) (Read 40779 times)
I left.
Franzl
YaBB God
Posts: 20474
Re: Parliamentary Bicameralism (Motion at Vote)
«
Reply #225 on:
April 23, 2009, 09:47:33 am »
Quote from: afleitch on April 23, 2009, 07:08:11 am
Quote from: Enor, enor d'ar gwenn-ha-du on April 23, 2009, 07:05:09 am
Aye, but an article for impeachment of the President needs to be put in either Article 1 or 3.
Aye with the above mentiond condition.
Logged
I've lost interest in the forum and I've wasted far too much time here.
To those I consider forum friends, it's been nice and I hope to keep contact in some form.
Cheers.
Lief
YaBB God
Posts: 27109
Political Matrix
E: -5.81, S: -6.54
Re: Parliamentary Bicameralism (Motion at Vote)
«
Reply #226 on:
April 23, 2009, 09:53:40 am »
Aye, I guess, though I really think that electing people from the regions is a bad idea. Which elections are currently more exciting and competitive, our national Senate elections or our regional Senate elections? Often we're lucky if more than one person runs for a regional seat.
Logged
Purple State
YaBB God
Posts: 6786
Re: Parliamentary Bicameralism (Motion at Vote)
«
Reply #227 on:
April 23, 2009, 10:57:53 am »
Quote from: Senator Lief on April 23, 2009, 09:53:40 am
Aye, I guess, though I really think that electing people from the regions is a bad idea. Which elections are currently more exciting and competitive, our national Senate elections or our regional Senate elections? Often we're lucky if more than one person runs for a regional seat.
Things can be edited later on. It's important that we get something no. Clearly no guarantee that regions will even exist.
Logged
Marokai/Purple Main Campaign Thread
Thank you to all our supporters!
Verily
Cuivienen
YaBB God
Posts: 16900
Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78
Re: Parliamentary Bicameralism (Motion at Vote)
«
Reply #228 on:
April 23, 2009, 02:44:43 pm »
Nay. Draft a version without Regions and then add them in later if the Convention supports them. Starting out with Regions in the plan biases it towards the introduction of Regions.
Logged
Purple State
YaBB God
Posts: 6786
Re: Parliamentary Bicameralism (Motion at Vote)
«
Reply #229 on:
April 23, 2009, 02:45:51 pm »
Quote from: Verily on April 23, 2009, 02:44:43 pm
Nay. Draft a version without Regions and then add them in later if the Convention supports them. Starting out with Regions in the plan biases it towards the introduction of Regions.
Wouldn't it be unbiased as it maintains the status quo? Rather than a blatant change that shows bias towards the no-region people?
Logged
Marokai/Purple Main Campaign Thread
Thank you to all our supporters!
ilikeverin
YaBB God
Posts: 14755
Re: Parliamentary Bicameralism (Motion at Vote)
«
Reply #230 on:
April 23, 2009, 05:45:43 pm »
Quote from: Mideast Assembly Speaker Purple State on April 23, 2009, 02:45:51 pm
Quote from: Verily on April 23, 2009, 02:44:43 pm
Nay. Draft a version without Regions and then add them in later if the Convention supports them. Starting out with Regions in the plan biases it towards the introduction of Regions.
Wouldn't it be unbiased as it maintains the status quo? Rather than a blatant change that shows bias towards the no-region people?
Oh, come now... no matter which way you set it, you are automatically biasing it against one way or another. We're looking for the best possible solution here.
Logged
Folk Representant of the Most Serene Republic of the Midwest, registered in the State of Joy, in Atlasia
Recognized National Treasure of Atlasia
Devilman88
YaBB God
Posts: 2555
Political Matrix
E: 5.94, S: 2.61
Re: Parliamentary Bicameralism (Motion at Vote)
«
Reply #231 on:
April 23, 2009, 06:05:02 pm »
Quote from: ilikeverin on April 23, 2009, 05:45:43 pm
Quote from: Mideast Assembly Speaker Purple State on April 23, 2009, 02:45:51 pm
Quote from: Verily on April 23, 2009, 02:44:43 pm
Nay. Draft a version without Regions and then add them in later if the Convention supports them. Starting out with Regions in the plan biases it towards the introduction of Regions.
Wouldn't it be unbiased as it maintains the status quo? Rather than a blatant change that shows bias towards the no-region people?
Oh, come now... no matter which way you set it, you are automatically biasing it against one way or another. We're looking for the best possible solution here.
This is just a Draft that can be changed. Our goal right now is to get a draft of all three so we can make a vote it them, I believe. Once we know which one we will use we can edit it more. It is going to be very hard to try to find three different constitutionals that everyone agree on.
Logged
Daniel Adams
YaBB God
Posts: 1436
Political Matrix
E: 9.03, S: 2.43
Re: Parliamentary Bicameralism (Motion at Vote)
«
Reply #232 on:
April 23, 2009, 06:27:29 pm »
Aye
Logged
Verily
Cuivienen
YaBB God
Posts: 16900
Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78
Re: Parliamentary Bicameralism (Motion at Vote)
«
Reply #233 on:
April 23, 2009, 08:18:26 pm »
Quote from: Mideast Assembly Speaker Purple State on April 23, 2009, 02:45:51 pm
Quote from: Verily on April 23, 2009, 02:44:43 pm
Nay. Draft a version without Regions and then add them in later if the Convention supports them. Starting out with Regions in the plan biases it towards the introduction of Regions.
Wouldn't it be unbiased as it maintains the status quo? Rather than a blatant change that shows bias towards the no-region people?
No. It is always less biased to build up from minimalism than to "build down", so to speak, regardless of what the issue is under consideration.
You might say, for example, that it would be less biased towards any constitutional position to start with the current Constitution and modify from there than it is to begin with a new Constitution. But that would be false; beginning with the current Constitution as a base would bias the Convention towards a Constitution more strongly resembling the current Constitution.
«
Last Edit: April 23, 2009, 08:21:12 pm by Verily
»
Logged
Devilman88
YaBB God
Posts: 2555
Political Matrix
E: 5.94, S: 2.61
Re: Parliamentary Bicameralism (Motion at Vote)
«
Reply #234 on:
April 23, 2009, 09:00:28 pm »
Well, lets vote for this and if it passes then we can have a vote on taking the Regions out.
Logged
Fine...I Made This More Civil
persepolis
Sr. Member
Posts: 471
Re: Parliamentary Bicameralism (Motion at Vote)
«
Reply #235 on:
April 23, 2009, 09:45:10 pm »
Quote from: $Dan$ on April 23, 2009, 09:00:28 pm
Well, lets vote for this and if it passes then we can have a vote on taking the Regions out.
I suggest the regions vote go first, since the part about the regions is included in the outline you are about to vote on. However, it is a good idea to vote on the regions and the actual outline separately.
Logged
Do Americans really need the government to shell out billions of dollars to large corporations, who then go to their sorry-excuses-for-executives and give them bonuses? I think not....
dead0man
YaBB God
Posts: 19158
Political Matrix
E: 6.84, S: -4.52
Re: Parliamentary Bicameralism (Motion at Vote)
«
Reply #236 on:
April 24, 2009, 12:31:42 am »
aye
Logged
Quote from: Martha Gellhorn for The Atlantic 1961
The unique misfortune of the Palestinian refugees is that they are a weapon in what seems to be a permanent war...today, in the Middle East, you get a repeated sinking sensation about the Palestinian refugees: they are only a beginning, not an end. Their function is to hang around and be constantly useful as a goad. The ultimate aim is not such humane small potatoes as repatriating refugees.
Marokai
Marokai Blue
YaBB God
Posts: 16065
Re: Parliamentary Bicameralism (Motion at Vote)
«
Reply #237 on:
April 24, 2009, 01:38:06 am »
Quote from: Verily on April 23, 2009, 08:18:26 pm
Quote from: Mideast Assembly Speaker Purple State on April 23, 2009, 02:45:51 pm
Quote from: Verily on April 23, 2009, 02:44:43 pm
Nay. Draft a version without Regions and then add them in later if the Convention supports them. Starting out with Regions in the plan biases it towards the introduction of Regions.
Wouldn't it be unbiased as it maintains the status quo? Rather than a blatant change that shows bias towards the no-region people?
No. It is always less biased to build up from minimalism than to "build down", so to speak, regardless of what the issue is under consideration.
You might say, for example, that it would be less biased towards any constitutional position to start with the current Constitution and modify from there than it is to begin with a new Constitution. But that would be false; beginning with the current Constitution as a base would bias the Convention towards a Constitution more strongly resembling the current Constitution.
There are plenty of people here who support retaining regions, in some form or another, including myself. Either way you're probably going to end up voting on the issue, since the people who oppose it will want them ripped out and the people who support them will want to retain them/put them back in.
Logged
Quote from: 後援会 on August 26, 2012, 12:29:57 am
I do not want my children to be integrated into a pro-homosexual discourse
Marokai
Marokai Blue
YaBB God
Posts: 16065
Re: Parliamentary Bicameralism (Motion at Vote)
«
Reply #238 on:
April 24, 2009, 01:39:58 am »
As for the vote;
Aye
, but I want some discussion on the possibility of adding consecutive term limits.
Logged
Quote from: 後援会 on August 26, 2012, 12:29:57 am
I do not want my children to be integrated into a pro-homosexual discourse
Fmr. Emperor PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
YaBB God
Posts: 21507
Political Matrix
E: 7.35, S: -4.35
Re: Parliamentary Bicameralism (Motion at Vote)
«
Reply #239 on:
April 24, 2009, 11:35:30 am »
Aye
Logged
Farewell to a legend:
r
(x,y) != <-y,x>
http://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=103836.0
Verily
Cuivienen
YaBB God
Posts: 16900
Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78
Re: Parliamentary Bicameralism (Motion at Vote)
«
Reply #240 on:
April 24, 2009, 12:13:23 pm »
Quote from: AG Marokai Blue on April 24, 2009, 01:38:06 am
Quote from: Verily on April 23, 2009, 08:18:26 pm
Quote from: Mideast Assembly Speaker Purple State on April 23, 2009, 02:45:51 pm
Quote from: Verily on April 23, 2009, 02:44:43 pm
Nay. Draft a version without Regions and then add them in later if the Convention supports them. Starting out with Regions in the plan biases it towards the introduction of Regions.
Wouldn't it be unbiased as it maintains the status quo? Rather than a blatant change that shows bias towards the no-region people?
No. It is always less biased to build up from minimalism than to "build down", so to speak, regardless of what the issue is under consideration.
You might say, for example, that it would be less biased towards any constitutional position to start with the current Constitution and modify from there than it is to begin with a new Constitution. But that would be false; beginning with the current Constitution as a base would bias the Convention towards a Constitution more strongly resembling the current Constitution.
There are plenty of people here who support retaining regions, in some form or another, including myself. Either way you're probably going to end up voting on the issue, since the people who oppose it will want them ripped out and the people who support them will want to retain them/put them back in.
That's not my point. Inserting them in the original proposal is biased in favor of retaining them. I know we're going to vote on it at some point.
Quote from: $Dan$ on April 23, 2009, 09:00:28 pm
Well, lets vote for this and if it passes then we can have a vote on taking the Regions out.
You're totally ignoring my point. It is always easier to insert a provision than to remove one. Therefore, adding extra, unnecessary provisions, like Regions, bias the proposal in favor of the introduction of Regions. It's a basic principle of drafting that you
start simple
. This proposal is not doing so, and I won't stand for it.
«
Last Edit: April 24, 2009, 12:16:56 pm by Verily
»
Logged
Purple State
YaBB God
Posts: 6786
Re: Parliamentary Bicameralism (Motion at Vote)
«
Reply #241 on:
April 26, 2009, 05:59:58 pm »
Final Tally
Aye = 9
Nay = 1
Quorum: Achieved (barely, cmon guys)
Motion PASSES
If someone would like to write up an impeachment section that would be great.
Logged
Marokai/Purple Main Campaign Thread
Thank you to all our supporters!
Devilman88
YaBB God
Posts: 2555
Political Matrix
E: 5.94, S: 2.61
Re: Parliamentary Bicameralism (Motion Passed, Resuming Discussion)
«
Reply #242 on:
April 26, 2009, 06:39:11 pm »
Quote from: $Dan$ on April 22, 2009, 09:32:25 pm
Article 1: The Congress of Atlasia
Section 1: Formation of the Senate
1. The Senate shall be composed of five Senators elected by a popular vote of the citizens of Atlasia, each with a term of six months.
2. No Person shall be eligible to run for Senate who has not attained two hundred or more posts. A Senator may not hold any other public office in Atlasia for the duration of their term.
3. The Senate shall choose their other officers, and also a President pro tempore, who shall act as President of the Senate in the absence of the President and who shall manage the everyday business of the Senate.
4. The President of the Republic of Atlasia shall be the President of the Senate, but shall have no vote unless they be equally divided.
Section 2: Formation of the House
1. The House of Representatives, herein referred to as House, shall be made up of sixteen Representatives, each with a term of three months.
2. No Person shall be eligible to run for the House who has not attained one hundred or more posts. A Representative may not hold any other federal or executive office in Atlasia for the duration of their term.
3. The House shall elect a Speaker of the House who shall be responsible for chairing debate that occurs within the House and for managing every day business.
Section 3: Congressional Rules and Legislation
1. The separate chambers of Congress may establish their own rules of procedure, and with the concurrence of two-thirds of its number, respectively, may expel a member of the same chamber.
2. Each chamber shall have fulfilled a quorum if a majority of its members are capable of discharging their offices and sworn into office. A quorum in each chamber shall have voted on any Resolution, Bill, Impeachment or Constitutional Amendment for it to be considered valid.
3. For any Bill or Resolution to pass the Congress, it shall have gained a majority in a valid vote in each respective chamber. Before the Bill or Resolution becomes Law, it shall be presented to the PPT, Speaker, and sponsors of the Bill or Resolution from each chamber for conference, unless it be concerning the rules for the proceedings of a chamber. Upon resolution of any differences between the separate versions of legislation, the Bill or Resolution shall be returned to both chambers for approval. If passed by both chambers separately, the revised Bill or Resolution shall then be presented to the President of the Republic of Atlasia. If the President approves, he shall sign it, and it shall become Law. If the President does not approve, he shall return the Bill with his objections to the Congress, and it shall not become Law. Upon reconsidering the Bill, if each chamber shall approve the legislation by two-thirds of its number, it shall become Law. If a Bill is not returned to the Congress by the President within seven days after it shall have been presented to him, it shall become Law regardless.
Section 4: Elections to Congress
1. Elections for the Senate shall be held on the 2nd Thursday in the months of January and July.
2. The House election shall be as the following:
i. The House will be split into groups A, B, C, D, each having four Representatives in each group
ii. Group A elections are held on the 1st Thursday of Jan, April, July and Oct
iii. Group B elections are held on the 1st Thursday of Feb, May, Aug and Nov
iiii. Group C elections are held on the last Thursday of Jan, April, July and Oct
iiiii. Group D elections are held on the last Thursday of Feb, May, Aug and Nov
2. Elections shall be held from midnight Eastern Standard Time and shall conclude exactly 72 hours later.
3. If a vacancy shall occur in the House or Senate then a special election shall be called to fill the remainder of the vacted term within one week of the vacancy occurring; Such special election shall be held from midnight Eastern Standard Time on a Friday and shall conclude exactly 72 hours later. However, if a vacancy shall occur when there is a person due to assume that office within two weeks, then no special election shall be necessary
4. The Senate shall have necessary power to determine regulations for the procedure of and the form of Congressional elections and shall have necessary power to determine a procedure for declaration of candidacy for such elections. All elections to Congress shall be by public post.
5. Those elected in ordinary elections to Congress shall take office at noon Eastern Standard Time on the Friday following their election. Those elected in special elections to the Senate or appointed to the House shall take office as soon as the result of their election or appointment has been formally declared.
Section 5: Powers of the Congress (with some small edits later)
[insert the current Article 1, Section 5 here]
Section 6: Powers denied to the Congress (with some small edits later)
[insert the current Article 1, Section 6 here]
Section 7: Powers denied to the Regions (with some small edits later)
[insert the current Article 1, Section 7 here]
I would like for this to be replaced with the current Article I.
Logged
Hashemite
YaBB God
Posts: 30156
Political Matrix
E: -1.29, S: -7.30
Re: Parliamentary Bicameralism (Motion Passed, Resuming Discussion)
«
Reply #243 on:
April 26, 2009, 07:16:22 pm »
Quote from: $Dan$ on April 26, 2009, 06:39:11 pm
Quote from: $Dan$ on April 22, 2009, 09:32:25 pm
Article 1: The Congress of Atlasia
Section 1: Formation of the Senate
1. The Senate shall be composed of five Senators elected by a popular vote of the citizens of Atlasia, each with a term of six months.
2. No Person shall be eligible to run for Senate who has not attained two hundred or more posts. A Senator may not hold any other public office in Atlasia for the duration of their term.
3. The Senate shall choose their other officers, and also a President pro tempore, who shall act as President of the Senate in the absence of the President and who shall manage the everyday business of the Senate.
4. The President of the Republic of Atlasia shall be the President of the Senate, but shall have no vote unless they be equally divided.
Section 2: Formation of the House
1. The House of Representatives, herein referred to as House, shall be made up of sixteen Representatives, each with a term of three months.
2. No Person shall be eligible to run for the House who has not attained one hundred or more posts. A Representative may not hold any other federal or executive office in Atlasia for the duration of their term.
3. The House shall elect a Speaker of the House who shall be responsible for chairing debate that occurs within the House and for managing every day business.
Section 3: Congressional Rules and Legislation
1. The separate chambers of Congress may establish their own rules of procedure, and with the concurrence of two-thirds of its number, respectively, may expel a member of the same chamber.
2. Each chamber shall have fulfilled a quorum if a majority of its members are capable of discharging their offices and sworn into office. A quorum in each chamber shall have voted on any Resolution, Bill, Impeachment or Constitutional Amendment for it to be considered valid.
3. For any Bill or Resolution to pass the Congress, it shall have gained a majority in a valid vote in each respective chamber. Before the Bill or Resolution becomes Law, it shall be presented to the PPT, Speaker, and sponsors of the Bill or Resolution from each chamber for conference, unless it be concerning the rules for the proceedings of a chamber. Upon resolution of any differences between the separate versions of legislation, the Bill or Resolution shall be returned to both chambers for approval. If passed by both chambers separately, the revised Bill or Resolution shall then be presented to the President of the Republic of Atlasia. If the President approves, he shall sign it, and it shall become Law. If the President does not approve, he shall return the Bill with his objections to the Congress, and it shall not become Law. Upon reconsidering the Bill, if each chamber shall approve the legislation by two-thirds of its number, it shall become Law. If a Bill is not returned to the Congress by the President within seven days after it shall have been presented to him, it shall become Law regardless.
Section 4: Elections to Congress
1. Elections for the Senate shall be held on the 2nd Thursday in the months of January and July.
2. The House election shall be as the following:
i. The House will be split into groups A, B, C, D, each having four Representatives in each group
ii. Group A elections are held on the 1st Thursday of Jan, April, July and Oct
iii. Group B elections are held on the 1st Thursday of Feb, May, Aug and Nov
iiii. Group C elections are held on the last Thursday of Jan, April, July and Oct
iiiii. Group D elections are held on the last Thursday of Feb, May, Aug and Nov
2. Elections shall be held from midnight Eastern Standard Time and shall conclude exactly 72 hours later.
3. If a vacancy shall occur in the House or Senate then a special election shall be called to fill the remainder of the vacted term within one week of the vacancy occurring; Such special election shall be held from midnight Eastern Standard Time on a Friday and shall conclude exactly 72 hours later. However, if a vacancy shall occur when there is a person due to assume that office within two weeks, then no special election shall be necessary
4. The Senate shall have necessary power to determine regulations for the procedure of and the form of Congressional elections and shall have necessary power to determine a procedure for declaration of candidacy for such elections. All elections to Congress shall be by public post.
5. Those elected in ordinary elections to Congress shall take office at noon Eastern Standard Time on the Friday following their election. Those elected in special elections to the Senate or appointed to the House shall take office as soon as the result of their election or appointment has been formally declared.
Section 5: Powers of the Congress (with some small edits later)
[insert the current Article 1, Section 5 here]
Section 6: Powers denied to the Congress (with some small edits later)
[insert the current Article 1, Section 6 here]
Section 7: Powers denied to the Regions (with some small edits later)
[insert the current Article 1, Section 7 here]
I would like for this to be replaced with the current Article I.
What?
Logged
Quote
20:12 oakvale Taylor Swift's 22 was originally titled 75 in reference to her ex Flanby's proposed tax rate
Quote
20:49 Snowstalker yes, but i'm the kind of fascist who would have backed the allies
20:57 Snowstalker sadly, it's a legitimate ideology tarnished by the incompetent mussolini and the vile hitler
Fmr. Emperor PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
YaBB God
Posts: 21507
Political Matrix
E: 7.35, S: -4.35
Re: Parliamentary Bicameralism (Motion Passed, Resuming Discussion)
«
Reply #244 on:
April 26, 2009, 07:25:06 pm »
Quote from: Enor, enor d'ar gwenn-ha-du on April 26, 2009, 07:16:22 pm
Quote from: $Dan$ on April 26, 2009, 06:39:11 pm
Quote from: $Dan$ on April 22, 2009, 09:32:25 pm
Article 1: The Congress of Atlasia
Section 1: Formation of the Senate
1. The Senate shall be composed of five Senators elected by a popular vote of the citizens of Atlasia, each with a term of six months.
2. No Person shall be eligible to run for Senate who has not attained two hundred or more posts. A Senator may not hold any other public office in Atlasia for the duration of their term.
3. The Senate shall choose their other officers, and also a President pro tempore, who shall act as President of the Senate in the absence of the President and who shall manage the everyday business of the Senate.
4. The President of the Republic of Atlasia shall be the President of the Senate, but shall have no vote unless they be equally divided.
Section 2: Formation of the House
1. The House of Representatives, herein referred to as House, shall be made up of sixteen Representatives, each with a term of three months.
2. No Person shall be eligible to run for the House who has not attained one hundred or more posts. A Representative may not hold any other federal or executive office in Atlasia for the duration of their term.
3. The House shall elect a Speaker of the House who shall be responsible for chairing debate that occurs within the House and for managing every day business.
Section 3: Congressional Rules and Legislation
1. The separate chambers of Congress may establish their own rules of procedure, and with the concurrence of two-thirds of its number, respectively, may expel a member of the same chamber.
2. Each chamber shall have fulfilled a quorum if a majority of its members are capable of discharging their offices and sworn into office. A quorum in each chamber shall have voted on any Resolution, Bill, Impeachment or Constitutional Amendment for it to be considered valid.
3. For any Bill or Resolution to pass the Congress, it shall have gained a majority in a valid vote in each respective chamber. Before the Bill or Resolution becomes Law, it shall be presented to the PPT, Speaker, and sponsors of the Bill or Resolution from each chamber for conference, unless it be concerning the rules for the proceedings of a chamber. Upon resolution of any differences between the separate versions of legislation, the Bill or Resolution shall be returned to both chambers for approval. If passed by both chambers separately, the revised Bill or Resolution shall then be presented to the President of the Republic of Atlasia. If the President approves, he shall sign it, and it shall become Law. If the President does not approve, he shall return the Bill with his objections to the Congress, and it shall not become Law. Upon reconsidering the Bill, if each chamber shall approve the legislation by two-thirds of its number, it shall become Law. If a Bill is not returned to the Congress by the President within seven days after it shall have been presented to him, it shall become Law regardless.
Section 4: Elections to Congress
1. Elections for the Senate shall be held on the 2nd Thursday in the months of January and July.
2. The House election shall be as the following:
i. The House will be split into groups A, B, C, D, each having four Representatives in each group
ii. Group A elections are held on the 1st Thursday of Jan, April, July and Oct
iii. Group B elections are held on the 1st Thursday of Feb, May, Aug and Nov
iiii. Group C elections are held on the last Thursday of Jan, April, July and Oct
iiiii. Group D elections are held on the last Thursday of Feb, May, Aug and Nov
2. Elections shall be held from midnight Eastern Standard Time and shall conclude exactly 72 hours later.
3. If a vacancy shall occur in the House or Senate then a special election shall be called to fill the remainder of the vacted term within one week of the vacancy occurring; Such special election shall be held from midnight Eastern Standard Time on a Friday and shall conclude exactly 72 hours later. However, if a vacancy shall occur when there is a person due to assume that office within two weeks, then no special election shall be necessary
4. The Senate shall have necessary power to determine regulations for the procedure of and the form of Congressional elections and shall have necessary power to determine a procedure for declaration of candidacy for such elections. All elections to Congress shall be by public post.
5. Those elected in ordinary elections to Congress shall take office at noon Eastern Standard Time on the Friday following their election. Those elected in special elections to the Senate or appointed to the House shall take office as soon as the result of their election or appointment has been formally declared.
Section 5: Powers of the Congress (with some small edits later)
[insert the current Article 1, Section 5 here]
Section 6: Powers denied to the Congress (with some small edits later)
[insert the current Article 1, Section 6 here]
Section 7: Powers denied to the Regions (with some small edits later)
[insert the current Article 1, Section 7 here]
I would like for this to be replaced with the current Article I.
What?
I second that reaction. Such a move would make this neither parliamentary nor bicameral.
Logged
Farewell to a legend:
r
(x,y) != <-y,x>
http://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=103836.0
Purple State
YaBB God
Posts: 6786
Re: Parliamentary Bicameralism (Motion Passed, Resuming Discussion)
«
Reply #245 on:
April 26, 2009, 08:55:39 pm »
I think all he did was change the way elections work for the House...
Logged
Marokai/Purple Main Campaign Thread
Thank you to all our supporters!
Fmr. Emperor PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
YaBB God
Posts: 21507
Political Matrix
E: 7.35, S: -4.35
Re: Parliamentary Bicameralism (Motion Passed, Resuming Discussion)
«
Reply #246 on:
April 26, 2009, 11:07:44 pm »
Quote from: Mideast Assembly Speaker Purple State on April 26, 2009, 08:55:39 pm
I think all he did was change the way elections work for the House...
Oh. I'm slightly confused now.
Logged
Farewell to a legend:
r
(x,y) != <-y,x>
http://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=103836.0
Devilman88
YaBB God
Posts: 2555
Political Matrix
E: 5.94, S: 2.61
Re: Parliamentary Bicameralism (Motion Passed, Resuming Discussion)
«
Reply #247 on:
April 26, 2009, 11:26:34 pm »
Quote from: Senator PiT on April 26, 2009, 11:07:44 pm
Quote from: Mideast Assembly Speaker Purple State on April 26, 2009, 08:55:39 pm
I think all he did was change the way elections work for the House...
Oh. I'm slightly confused now.
Yea I just split the House into four groups, A, B, C and D. I know some people wanted it to have no regions, so I made this one for the sole purpose of no regions.
Logged
Marokai
Marokai Blue
YaBB God
Posts: 16065
Re: Parliamentary Bicameralism (Motion Passed, Resuming Discussion)
«
Reply #248 on:
April 26, 2009, 11:35:49 pm »
I mean, I guess I sort of see the reasoning to staggering the elections if you're going to do away with regions, but why not just keep regions and allow dual office holding? There's no harm in that.
Logged
Quote from: 後援会 on August 26, 2012, 12:29:57 am
I do not want my children to be integrated into a pro-homosexual discourse
Devilman88
YaBB God
Posts: 2555
Political Matrix
E: 5.94, S: 2.61
Re: Parliamentary Bicameralism (Motion Passed, Resuming Discussion)
«
Reply #249 on:
April 26, 2009, 11:40:29 pm »
Quote from: AG Marokai Blue on April 26, 2009, 11:35:49 pm
I mean, I guess I sort of see the reasoning to staggering the elections if you're going to do away with regions, but why not just keep regions and allow dual office holding? There's no harm in that.
That was my plan, for House members. In the Article that passed it states, "No Person shall be eligible to run for the House who has not attained one hundred or more posts. A Representative may not hold any other federal or executive office in Atlasia for the duration of their term." So any house member could hold an office that is federal or like a governor, but they could be Assembly members.
I only came up with the other plan because some wanted to take the region out of the Article that passed.
Logged
Pages:
1
...
5
6
7
8
9
[
10
]
11
12
13
14
15
...
19
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> 2016 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2000 U.S. Presidential Election Results
=> Presidential Election Trends
=> Election What-ifs?
===> Past Election What-ifs (US)
===> Alternative Elections
===> International What-ifs
-----------------------------
Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Gubernatorial/Statewide Elections
===> 2013 & Odd Year Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2014 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> Congressional Elections
===> 2014 Senatorial Election Polls
=> International Elections
=> Election Predictions
-----------------------------
Questions and Answers
-----------------------------
=> Presidential Election Process
===> Electoral Reform
===> Polling
=> The Atlas
===> How To
-----------------------------
General Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Constitution and Law
=> Religion & Philosophy
=> History
===> Alternative History
-----------------------------
General Politics
-----------------------------
=> U.S. General Discussion
=> Political Geography & Demographics
=> International General Discussion
=> Economics
=> Individual Politics
=> Political Debate
===> Political Essays & Deliberation
===> Book Reviews and Discussion
-----------------------------
Election Archive
-----------------------------
=> 2012 Elections
===> 2012 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2012 House Election Polls
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2012 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> 2010 Elections
===> 2010 House Election Polls
===> 2010 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2010 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> 2008 Elections
===> 2008 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2008 Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Polls
=> 2006 Elections
===> 2006 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2006 Gubernatorial Election Polls
-----------------------------
Forum Community
-----------------------------
=> Forum Community
===> Forum Community Election Match-ups
=> Election and History Games
===> Mock Parliment
===> Town Hall
===> Survivor
===> Interactive Timelines
=> Off-topic Board
-----------------------------
Atlas Fantasy Elections
-----------------------------
=> Atlas Fantasy Elections
===> Voting Booth
=> Atlas Fantasy Government
===> Constitutional Convention
===> Regional Governments
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Powered by SMF 1.1.18
|
SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Loading...