Home
2012
Election Results
Election Info
Weblog
Wiki
Search
Email
Site Info
Store
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
May 19, 2013, 12:29:40 am
News:
Please delete your old personal messages.
Atlas Forum
Atlas Fantasy Elections
Atlas Fantasy Government
Constitutional Convention
(Moderators:
Gustaf
,
MasterJedi
)
Parliamentary Bicameralism (Discussion Open)
« previous
next »
Pages:
1
...
10
11
12
13
14
[
15
]
16
17
18
19
Author
Topic: Parliamentary Bicameralism (Discussion Open) (Read 40782 times)
Purple State
YaBB God
Posts: 6786
Re: Parliamentary Bicameralism (Motion at Vote)
«
Reply #350 on:
May 11, 2009, 01:38:33 pm »
Current Vote Tally
Aye = 8 (Hashemite, Marokai, Dan, PiT, Franzl, Verily, afleitch, Lief)
Nay = 1 (MasterJedi)
Abstain = 0
Quorum: Not yet achieved
Time Remaining: >24 hours
Logged
Marokai/Purple Main Campaign Thread
Thank you to all our supporters!
bgwah
YaBB God
Posts: 13389
Political Matrix
E: -4.52, S: -8.17
Re: Parliamentary Bicameralism (Motion at Vote)
«
Reply #351 on:
May 11, 2009, 03:02:53 pm »
Nay
Logged
dead0man
YaBB God
Posts: 19159
Political Matrix
E: 6.84, S: -4.52
Re: Parliamentary Bicameralism (Motion at Vote)
«
Reply #352 on:
May 11, 2009, 04:20:51 pm »
Aye
Logged
Quote from: Martha Gellhorn for The Atlantic 1961
The unique misfortune of the Palestinian refugees is that they are a weapon in what seems to be a permanent war...today, in the Middle East, you get a repeated sinking sensation about the Palestinian refugees: they are only a beginning, not an end. Their function is to hang around and be constantly useful as a goad. The ultimate aim is not such humane small potatoes as repatriating refugees.
bullmoose88
YaBB God
Posts: 14283
Re: Parliamentary Bicameralism (Motion at Vote)
«
Reply #353 on:
May 11, 2009, 04:22:21 pm »
Aye
Logged
A Socially Liberal, Fiscally Conservative NE Republican with some Left-Libertarian/3rd Way Leanings. Simply, a Rockefeller Republican.
According to one poster, I represent a...
Quote from: Kalwejt Assange on December 13, 2010, 01:38:32 pm
Dying bread of Americans.
Daniel Adams
YaBB God
Posts: 1436
Political Matrix
E: 9.03, S: 2.43
Re: Parliamentary Bicameralism (Motion at Vote)
«
Reply #354 on:
May 11, 2009, 04:24:00 pm »
Satisfied with the clarification for Section 3 Clause 3, I vote Aye.
Logged
Big DaddyTX
AndrewCT
Moderators
YaBB God
Posts: 6855
Re: Parliamentary Bicameralism (Motion at Vote)
«
Reply #355 on:
May 11, 2009, 05:53:06 pm »
ehh....aye.
Logged
Quote from: Obama lean Bushie on August 28, 2012, 12:27:23 pm
Stop trying to get me on small technicalities.
Quote from: I'm gonna sink your battleship!! on October 30, 2012, 07:23:57 pm
My parents are pretty good about smelling a rat.
ilikeverin
YaBB God
Posts: 14755
Re: Parliamentary Bicameralism (Motion at Vote)
«
Reply #356 on:
May 11, 2009, 06:24:11 pm »
Then, um, what does Sec. 3 Part 3
do
? Nobody gets paid in Atlasia
Yup overall, I guess.
Logged
Folk Representant of the Most Serene Republic of the Midwest, registered in the State of Joy, in Atlasia
Recognized National Treasure of Atlasia
Smid
YaBB God
Posts: 5388
Re: Parliamentary Bicameralism (Motion at Vote)
«
Reply #357 on:
May 11, 2009, 06:35:07 pm »
Aye.
Logged
Purple State
YaBB God
Posts: 6786
Re: Parliamentary Bicameralism (Motion at Vote)
«
Reply #358 on:
May 12, 2009, 07:00:49 pm »
Final Vote Tally
Aye = 14 (Hashemite, Marokai, Dan, PiT, Franzl, Verily, afleitch, Lief, dead0, Smid, ilikeverin, AndrewCT, Daniel Adams, bullmoose88)
Nay = 2 (MasterJedi, bgwah)
Abstain = 0
Quorum: Achieved
Motion PASSES
Logged
Marokai/Purple Main Campaign Thread
Thank you to all our supporters!
CultureKing
YaBB God
Posts: 3240
Re: Parliamentary Bicameralism (Discussion Open)
«
Reply #359 on:
May 13, 2009, 05:13:32 pm »
FTR: NAY
Logged
Econ: -6.50, Social: -5.23
Purple State
YaBB God
Posts: 6786
Re: Parliamentary Bicameralism (Discussion Open)
«
Reply #360 on:
May 13, 2009, 11:07:11 pm »
Any proposals for the Judiciary? I believe our current form is pretty good, but does anyone have other thoughts?
Logged
Marokai/Purple Main Campaign Thread
Thank you to all our supporters!
Senator MaxQue
MaxQue
YaBB God
Posts: 6518
Re: Parliamentary Bicameralism (Discussion Open)
«
Reply #361 on:
May 13, 2009, 11:11:16 pm »
FTR: Yes
The actual system is good.
The only thing who should be discussed is who nominate judges?
Logged
Purple State
YaBB God
Posts: 6786
Re: Parliamentary Bicameralism (Discussion Open)
«
Reply #362 on:
May 13, 2009, 11:13:53 pm »
Quote from: MaxQue on May 13, 2009, 11:11:16 pm
FTR: Yes
The actual system is good.
The only thing who should be discussed is who nominate judges?
And their confirmation. Perhaps another way we can add prestige to the Senate.
Logged
Marokai/Purple Main Campaign Thread
Thank you to all our supporters!
Devilman88
YaBB God
Posts: 2555
Political Matrix
E: 5.94, S: 2.61
Re: Parliamentary Bicameralism (Discussion Open)
«
Reply #363 on:
May 14, 2009, 08:11:03 am »
Quote from: Senator Purple State on May 13, 2009, 11:13:53 pm
Quote from: MaxQue on May 13, 2009, 11:11:16 pm
FTR: Yes
The actual system is good.
The only thing who should be discussed is who nominate judges?
And their confirmation. Perhaps another way we can add prestige to the Senate.
That is a great idea, giving that power to the senate but not the house makes the Senate more powerful then the House.
Logged
Purple State
YaBB God
Posts: 6786
Re: Parliamentary Bicameralism (Discussion Open)
«
Reply #364 on:
May 14, 2009, 11:18:23 am »
For review and discussion:
Article III: The President of Atlasia
Section 1: The Presidency
1. The President of the Republic of Atlasia shall serve as the Head of State of Atlaisa and be elected for a term of approximately four months.
2. No person shall be President who has not attained 250 or more posts, and is not a registered voter.
3. The President shall be Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of the Republic of Atlasia.
4. When vacancies shall occur on the Supreme Court, the President shall nominate a replacement with the advice and consent of the Senate.
5. The President shall nominate a neutral and active Game Moderator for the creation of world simulations in Atlasia. The GM shall be appointed with the advice and consent of the Senate. The President or the Senate shall have the ability to dismiss the GM for reasons of inactivity or gross partiality.
6. The President shall serve as the chair of any joint session of Congress, either formally distinguished in this Constitution or otherwise.
Section 2: Election to the Presidency
1. Presidential elections shall be held in the months of February, June and October. Elections shall be held from midnight Eastern Standard Time on the second to last Friday of a given month and shall conclude exactly 72 hours later.
2. The Senate shall have necessary power to determine regulations for the procedure of and the form of Presidential elections and shall have necessary power to determine a procedure for declaration of candidacy for such elections. All elections to the Presidency shall be by public post.
3. The President shall take office at noon Eastern Standard Time on the first Friday in the month after their election.
Section 3: Vacancy and Incapacity of the Presidency
1. If the Presidency shall ever fall vacant or temporarily incapacitated, the President shall have the option to recommend a successor for himself, by public post. If the Senate shall concur, by two-thirds vote, with the decision of the President, the successor shall serve the remainder of the President's term.
2. If the Senate does not concur, emergency elections shall be held on the second Friday following the vacancy of the office. The shall have necessary power to determine regulations for the procedure of and the form of Presidential elections and shall have necessary power to determine a procedure for declaration of candidacy for such elections.
Article IV: The Supreme Court of Atlasia
Section 1: The Supreme Court
1. The judicial power of the Republic of Atlasia shall be vested in one Supreme Court.
2. The Supreme Court shall consist of three Justices who shall all be registered voters, one of whom shall be the Chief Justice. Justices shall hold their office during good behavior.
3. The Supreme Court shall be the sole body in the Forum with the authority to nullify or void federal laws. The Supreme Court shall only be able to nullify or void a federal law in the event that the federal law explicitly contradicts this Constitution.
4. The Supreme Court shall have authority to nullify or void regional laws. The Supreme Court shall only be able to nullify or void a regional law in the event that the regional law explicitly contradicts this Constitution.
5. The Supreme Court shall arbitrate in all disputes concerning federal elections.
Section 2: Trials
1. In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the region wherein the crime shall have been committed, which region shall have been previously ascertained by law.
2. If a trial does not occur within one month of the accusation for any reason, no trial shall be held and the accused will be declared innocent of the crime.
3. No person shall be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb.
4. No person shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself.
5. The accused shall be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.
6. All trials shall be presided over by a Supreme Court Justice, who shall be selected by the Supreme Court itself.
7. A jury shall be selected according to the laws of the Region in which the crime was committed and each juror shall post their verdict publicly.
Logged
Marokai/Purple Main Campaign Thread
Thank you to all our supporters!
Devilman88
YaBB God
Posts: 2555
Political Matrix
E: 5.94, S: 2.61
Re: Parliamentary Bicameralism (Discussion Open)
«
Reply #365 on:
May 14, 2009, 11:23:41 am »
Looks very good to me.
Logged
Senator MaxQue
MaxQue
YaBB God
Posts: 6518
Re: Parliamentary Bicameralism (Discussion Open)
«
Reply #366 on:
May 14, 2009, 12:40:26 pm »
What would happen if a regional law breaks a federal law?
No VP? What would happen if a vote is tied?
Logged
Fmr. Emperor PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
YaBB God
Posts: 21510
Political Matrix
E: 7.35, S: -4.35
Re: Parliamentary Bicameralism (Discussion Open)
«
Reply #367 on:
May 14, 2009, 01:06:22 pm »
Quote from: MaxQue on May 14, 2009, 12:40:26 pm
No VP? What would happen if a vote is tied?
I echo this concern. Aside from that problem, it's pretty good though.
Logged
Farewell to a legend:
r
(x,y) != <-y,x>
http://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=103836.0
Marokai
Marokai Blue
YaBB God
Posts: 16065
Re: Parliamentary Bicameralism (Discussion Open)
«
Reply #368 on:
May 14, 2009, 01:24:14 pm »
Why not just give the President the tie breaking power? I see no reason to waste a position on a Vice President.
Also, I don't like the section about the Game Moderator, I think if it's a Presidential appointment then it should remain a Presidential responsibility to remove the GM from office.
Logged
Quote from: 後援会 on August 26, 2012, 12:29:57 am
I do not want my children to be integrated into a pro-homosexual discourse
Devilman88
YaBB God
Posts: 2555
Political Matrix
E: 5.94, S: 2.61
Re: Parliamentary Bicameralism (Discussion Open)
«
Reply #369 on:
May 14, 2009, 01:40:37 pm »
Quote from: AG Marokai Blue on May 14, 2009, 01:24:14 pm
Why not just give the President the tie breaking power? I see no reason to waste a position on a Vice President.
Also, I don't like the section about the Game Moderator, I think if it's a Presidential appointment then it should remain a Presidential responsibility to remove the GM from office.
I agree with this.
Logged
Daniel Adams
YaBB God
Posts: 1436
Political Matrix
E: 9.03, S: 2.43
Re: Parliamentary Bicameralism (Discussion Open)
«
Reply #370 on:
May 14, 2009, 03:18:44 pm »
I agree that the President should have tie-breaking powers.
Regarding the GM, I think it's appropriate for the Senate to have the power to remove him. The GM has an extreme important role in keeping the game active and GMs that are clearly not willing or able to put in the time necessary for this need to be dealt with apace. The situation with Ebowed has shown that the President of Atlasia cannot always be trusted to do so.
«
Last Edit: May 14, 2009, 03:56:05 pm by Dirty South Lt. Gov. Daniel Adams
»
Logged
Senator MaxQue
MaxQue
YaBB God
Posts: 6518
Re: Parliamentary Bicameralism (Discussion Open)
«
Reply #371 on:
May 14, 2009, 03:23:23 pm »
Quote from: Dirty South Lt. Gov. Daniel Adams on May 14, 2009, 03:18:44 pm
I agree that the President should have tie-breaking powers.
Regarding the GM, I think it's appropriate for the President of the Senate to have the power to remove him. The GM has an extreme important role in keeping the game active and GMs that are clearly not willing or able to put in the time necessary for this need to be dealt with apace. The situation with Ebowed has shown that the President of Atlasia cannot always be trusted to do so.
It is not the President of the Senate who is written, but the President or the Senate.
Logged
Marokai
Marokai Blue
YaBB God
Posts: 16065
Re: Parliamentary Bicameralism (Discussion Open)
«
Reply #372 on:
May 14, 2009, 03:30:56 pm »
Quote from: Dirty South Lt. Gov. Daniel Adams on May 14, 2009, 03:18:44 pm
I agree that the President should have tie-breaking powers.
Regarding the GM, I think it's appropriate for the President of the Senate to have the power to remove him. The GM has an extreme important role in keeping the game active and GMs that are clearly not willing or able to put in the time necessary for this need to be dealt with apace. The situation with Ebowed has shown that the President of Atlasia cannot always be trusted to do so.
What's the point of having a President if all his decisions can be overruled by the legislature? You may as well just make the Prime Minister head of the armed forces and abolish the Presidency altogether.
Logged
Quote from: 後援会 on August 26, 2012, 12:29:57 am
I do not want my children to be integrated into a pro-homosexual discourse
Daniel Adams
YaBB God
Posts: 1436
Political Matrix
E: 9.03, S: 2.43
Re: Parliamentary Bicameralism (Discussion Open)
«
Reply #373 on:
May 14, 2009, 04:04:27 pm »
Quote from: MaxQue on May 14, 2009, 03:23:23 pm
Quote from: Dirty South Lt. Gov. Daniel Adams on May 14, 2009, 03:18:44 pm
I agree that the President should have tie-breaking powers.
Regarding the GM, I think it's appropriate for the President of the Senate to have the power to remove him. The GM has an extreme important role in keeping the game active and GMs that are clearly not willing or able to put in the time necessary for this need to be dealt with apace. The situation with Ebowed has shown that the President of Atlasia cannot always be trusted to do so.
It is not the President of the Senate who is written, but the President or the Senate.
Sorry about that typo. Got distracted.
Quote from: AG Marokai Blue on May 14, 2009, 03:30:56 pm
Quote from: Dirty South Lt. Gov. Daniel Adams on May 14, 2009, 03:18:44 pm
I agree that the President should have tie-breaking powers.
Regarding the GM, I think it's appropriate for the President of the Senate to have the power to remove him. The GM has an extreme important role in keeping the game active and GMs that are clearly not willing or able to put in the time necessary for this need to be dealt with apace. The situation with Ebowed has shown that the President of Atlasia cannot always be trusted to do so.
What's the point of having a President if all his decisions can be overruled by the legislature? You may as well just make the Prime Minister head of the armed forces and abolish the Presidency altogether.
We're only talking about the GM here, not "all his decisions". Let's not create a straw men. Atlasia's activity is an issue of paramount importance and if we are to have a GM we need to ensure that he is doing his job properly. I don't see the GM as a part of the Executive Branch, so there is no reason his permanence on the job should be exclusively up to the President. If the Senate believes the GM has become inactive, it must have the power to act. Are you satisfied with Ebowed's performance as GM?
Logged
Marokai
Marokai Blue
YaBB God
Posts: 16065
Re: Parliamentary Bicameralism (Discussion Open)
«
Reply #374 on:
May 14, 2009, 04:30:58 pm »
No, I'm not, but I also think we should abolish the position of game moderator and make a similar office that is an elected position.
But
I still think if the President makes the appointment, he should end up being the one to determine whether or not he stays or goes. Since we're basically makes the rules here for a new system, if you're going to include provisions for removal of the GM, appointed by the President, for whatever reason the Senate determines, then we might as well include provisions for Senate removal of any other appointed official.
The President doesn't really have a great deal of power in these models anyway, so if we're going to be able to run over some of his decisions through legislative action, why have one?
Logged
Quote from: 後援会 on August 26, 2012, 12:29:57 am
I do not want my children to be integrated into a pro-homosexual discourse
Pages:
1
...
10
11
12
13
14
[
15
]
16
17
18
19
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> 2016 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2000 U.S. Presidential Election Results
=> Presidential Election Trends
=> Election What-ifs?
===> Past Election What-ifs (US)
===> Alternative Elections
===> International What-ifs
-----------------------------
Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Gubernatorial/Statewide Elections
===> 2013 & Odd Year Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2014 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> Congressional Elections
===> 2014 Senatorial Election Polls
=> International Elections
=> Election Predictions
-----------------------------
Questions and Answers
-----------------------------
=> Presidential Election Process
===> Electoral Reform
===> Polling
=> The Atlas
===> How To
-----------------------------
General Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Constitution and Law
=> Religion & Philosophy
=> History
===> Alternative History
-----------------------------
General Politics
-----------------------------
=> U.S. General Discussion
=> Political Geography & Demographics
=> International General Discussion
=> Economics
=> Individual Politics
=> Political Debate
===> Political Essays & Deliberation
===> Book Reviews and Discussion
-----------------------------
Election Archive
-----------------------------
=> 2012 Elections
===> 2012 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2012 House Election Polls
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2012 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> 2010 Elections
===> 2010 House Election Polls
===> 2010 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2010 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> 2008 Elections
===> 2008 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2008 Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Polls
=> 2006 Elections
===> 2006 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2006 Gubernatorial Election Polls
-----------------------------
Forum Community
-----------------------------
=> Forum Community
===> Forum Community Election Match-ups
=> Election and History Games
===> Mock Parliment
===> Town Hall
===> Survivor
===> Interactive Timelines
=> Off-topic Board
-----------------------------
Atlas Fantasy Elections
-----------------------------
=> Atlas Fantasy Elections
===> Voting Booth
=> Atlas Fantasy Government
===> Constitutional Convention
===> Regional Governments
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Powered by SMF 1.1.18
|
SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Loading...