BushOklahoma v. PiT

[Јas]

It's your choose...

[dialectical fetishist]

I'll vote for the one who isn't a fundamentalist.

[I left.]

PiT

[Landslide Lyndon]

PiT.
 I may disagree sometimes with him, but at least he isn't confused about his ideology.

[Rowan]

PiT

[All life is a blur of Republicans and meat.]

PiT, not by all that much though.

[Fmr. Emperor PiT]

     I vote for myself.

[Torie]

PiT's my buddy. 

[Senator Ben]

I like both of them a lot, but BushOklahoma because PiT's views scare me.

[All life is a blur of Republicans and meat.]

I like both of them a lot, but BushOklahoma because PiT's views scare me.

The problem is that Okie's are even scarier although that may be changing (to some extent).

[Senator Ben]

I like both of them a lot, but BushOklahoma because PiT's views scare me.

The problem is that Okie's are even scarier although that may be changing (to some extent).

I disagree.  PiT's views, to me, are much worse than BushOklahoma's.  BushOklahoma is somewhat close to me on the issues, whereas PiT is on the total opposite end.

[JSojourner]

Real tough one.

First, both are great people -- very nice and likeable.

PiT is, I think, more informed and intelligent...and that counts for a lot with me.  Bush Oklahoma, I suspect, would govern with more of a heart.  I think he would be less likely to engage in social Darwinism than PiT.  On the other hand...

While I share Bush Oklahoma's faith, I would worry that he would welcome and encourag efforts to fund and officially religious expression on the part of the government.  I despise such efforts.  He would probably criminalize abortion, which I find unwise and -- ultimately -- futile. 

This would be a real tough one for me.  Since I believe government is part of the solution, I would probably just vote Democratic...because I so fundamentally disagree with Libertarian ideology.  However, if PiT were elected, I would know the country was in the hands of someone who was capable and informed. 

[BushArizona]

While I share Bush Oklahoma's faith, I would worry that he would welcome and encourag efforts to fund and officially religious expression on the part of the government.  I despise such efforts.  He would probably criminalize abortion, which I find unwise and -- ultimately -- futile.   

Uh no,

He has stated many times, on this forum, that we should maintain Roe V Wade for practical and safety reasons. Despite the fact that abortion is horrendous and that Roe was decided on absolutely no constitutional basis and the decision was pretty much impeachable for the judges.

[Senator Sbane]

PiT of course.

[Mint]

PiT but they're both good guys.

[War on Want]

PiT, not by all that much though.

[pogo stick]

PiT , he fits my economic views  moe better. But x10 more extreme.

[Senator Ben]

Both great guys, but BO on policy.

[AkSaber]

PiT, no surprise there.

It's nothing against Okie. He's a great guy, PiT is too.

[Reluctant Republican]

BushOklahoma seems like a great person, but I like PiT, and we have more compatible ideologies anyway.

[Grumps]

PiT but they're both good guys.