will deval patrick win reelection
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 03:56:55 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  will deval patrick win reelection
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: ....
#1
yes
 
#2
no
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 20

Author Topic: will deval patrick win reelection  (Read 6003 times)
WalterMitty
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,572


Political Matrix
E: 1.68, S: -2.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: May 01, 2009, 04:02:18 PM »

not looking good at this point
Logged
Kaine for Senate '18
benconstine
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,329
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: May 01, 2009, 04:06:37 PM »

I doubt it.
Logged
Verily
Cuivienen
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,663


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: May 01, 2009, 04:34:12 PM »

Is Cahill running in the primary or the general (and as an Indy or Republican if the general)?
Logged
WalterMitty
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,572


Political Matrix
E: 1.68, S: -2.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: May 01, 2009, 04:37:22 PM »

Is Cahill running in the primary or the general (and as an Indy or Republican if the general)?

he is running.

on what ticket has yet to be determined.
Logged
Dan the Roman
liberalrepublican
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,538
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: May 01, 2009, 05:24:01 PM »

Is Cahill running in the primary or the general (and as an Indy or Republican if the general)?

he is running.

on what ticket has yet to be determined.

Recent events(Patrick's cratering popularity, his feuding with the Democratic leadership in the legislature) make a primary challenge more likely in my view. Much of the Democratic establishment wants Patrick gone, and Cahill will have no trouble with money.

Oddly, I think a Cahill primary challenge would increase Patrick's odds of reelection. Cahill would be easy to tar as a hack, and Patrick could run an outsider warring with the hacks campaign in an effort to transfer his unpopularity to the legislature. His advisers seem to be leaning in that direction right now with the threat to veto the budget.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,485
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: May 01, 2009, 05:43:24 PM »
« Edited: May 02, 2009, 02:54:51 AM by Eraserhead »

I wouldn't rule him out completely. It depends on the opposition.
Logged
tmthforu94
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,402
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.26, S: -4.52

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: May 01, 2009, 06:07:02 PM »
« Edited: May 01, 2009, 06:21:52 PM by Romney/Huntsman`12 »

It cracks me up to think a Republican could win such a Democratic state...
But...
If Republicans put up a crap candidate, no. But if we put up a nice moderate who has a good amount of cash, this should be a nice pickup for the Republican party.
Logged
Joe Republic
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,082
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: May 01, 2009, 06:08:43 PM »

It cracks me up to think a Republican could win such a Democrat state...

Whoops!  You misspelled 'Democratic'.  You're welcome!
Logged
tmthforu94
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,402
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.26, S: -4.52

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: May 01, 2009, 06:22:27 PM »

It cracks me up to think a Republican could win such a Democrat state...

Whoops!  You misspelled 'Democratic'.  You're welcome!

Oh dear...
I never know whether to put Democrat or Democratic. It's so complicated. Republican is so much easier...
Logged
Joe Republic
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,082
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: May 01, 2009, 06:36:21 PM »

It shouldn't be difficult. Wink  'Democratic' is an adjective, and 'Democrat' is a noun.
Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: May 01, 2009, 07:11:08 PM »

So Republicanic would be the adjective?
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,940


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: May 01, 2009, 07:19:09 PM »

So Republicanic would be the adjective?

If you can't speak proper English, yes.
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,955


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: May 03, 2009, 08:47:37 AM »

Oddly, I think a Cahill primary challenge would increase Patrick's odds of reelection. Cahill would be easy to tar as a hack, and Patrick could run an outsider warring with the hacks campaign in an effort to transfer his unpopularity to the legislature. His advisers seem to be leaning in that direction right now with the threat to veto the budget.

I agree with your assessment of how a Cahill primary challenge would play out, but when you say "increasing Patrick's odds of reelection," I ask, as opposed to what scenario? Do you believe Charles Baker or some other Republican white knight could win? I doubt it. We've seen many cases where unpopular incumbent governors of a super-dominant party win re-election all over the country in the past 20 years, that's how this appears to be shaping up. Patrick is vulnerable to the right candidate but I can not conceive of who that person would be.
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,955


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: May 03, 2009, 08:48:24 AM »

But if we put up a nice moderate who has a good amount of cash, this should be a nice pickup for the Republican party.

Sounds like a job for Kerry Healey. Wink
Logged
Dan the Roman
liberalrepublican
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,538
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: May 03, 2009, 10:26:05 AM »

Oddly, I think a Cahill primary challenge would increase Patrick's odds of reelection. Cahill would be easy to tar as a hack, and Patrick could run an outsider warring with the hacks campaign in an effort to transfer his unpopularity to the legislature. His advisers seem to be leaning in that direction right now with the threat to veto the budget.

I agree with your assessment of how a Cahill primary challenge would play out, but when you say "increasing Patrick's odds of reelection," I ask, as opposed to what scenario? Do you believe Charles Baker or some other Republican white knight could win? I doubt it. We've seen many cases where unpopular incumbent governors of a super-dominant party win re-election all over the country in the past 20 years, that's how this appears to be shaping up. Patrick is vulnerable to the right candidate but I can not conceive of who that person would be.

I actually feel that this election resembles Dukakis' run for a 2nd term in 1978 a lot. A very unpopular Governor, irrelevant opposition party, Democratic legislature and party that are widely viewed as corrupt. What happened then was an outsider, Howie Carr type ran in the primary and shockingly(probably most of all to those who voted for him) beat Dukakis, and then went on to beat the Republican 51-49 in the fall. Cahill is however, not Ed King, he is not an outsider, and therefore not in a strong position to take advantage of Patrick's weaknesses. If Patrick is hackish, Cahill, with his wife is worse. Cahill supports casinos without any of Patrick's reluctance, and he is mainly responsible for the swaptions fiasco.

That said, I would not be so quick to rule out Baker or whoever the Republicans run. Bill Weld in 1990 had never won an office statewide, and his best performance had been a losing AG race which he had received 36% of the vote in. Ditto for Joe Malone that year who had won 34% in a senate race and went on to crush Bill Galvin with 63%. People are in an outsider mood, and the GOP is a viable vehicle, one that was mighty irrelevant in 1990 too. In fact I would argue the more obscure their candidate the better. A Romney rematch, or Scott Brown run would make their candidate the issue. Someone like Brian Lees or Bruce Tarr would be so bland as to be inconsequential except as a means of voting against the status quo.

I share your view of the GOP contenders as being bland non-entities. I don't agree that this means they can't win.
Logged
Small Business Owner of Any Repute
Mr. Moderate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,431
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: May 20, 2009, 05:32:23 PM »

This seemed like the best place to post this: Perhaps the defining vote pertaining to the 2010 election was held last night.

Mass. Senate approves sales-tax increase

Deval is opposed to the hike, which brings the rate from 5% to 6.25%, but it's going to become law anyway because Democrats in the legislature passed the increase with a veto-proof majority.
Logged
Dan the Roman
liberalrepublican
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,538
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: May 20, 2009, 06:53:19 PM »

This seemed like the best place to post this: Perhaps the defining vote pertaining to the 2010 election was held last night.

Mass. Senate approves sales-tax increase

Deval is opposed to the hike, which brings the rate from 5% to 6.25%, but it's going to become law anyway because Democrats in the legislature passed the increase with a veto-proof majority.

Most likely. He will veto anyway, and there is a chance that the outcry could be great enough to cause enough reps to reconsider to uphold the veto.

Ironic, isn't it, that Deval probably wishes there were another five Republicans in the Senate? They have been his strongest allies over the last month.
Logged
WalterMitty
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,572


Political Matrix
E: 1.68, S: -2.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: May 21, 2009, 09:59:43 AM »

i really hope deval makes a stand against the sales tax increase.  if his veto is overridden he needs to put up a fight in public.  go on media,  make a stand.

he is too weak.

i like deval. but he has no backbone.
Logged
RIP Robert H Bork
officepark
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,030
Czech Republic


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: May 21, 2009, 01:29:58 PM »

Hopefully not.
Logged
justfollowingtheelections
unempprof
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,766


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: May 21, 2009, 03:46:19 PM »

He probably will because i haven't heard of anyone challenging him in a primary... at least not yet.
Logged
SamInTheSouth
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 389


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: May 21, 2009, 09:45:15 PM »

It cracks me up to think a Republican could win such a Democratic state...
But...
If Republicans put up a crap candidate, no. But if we put up a nice moderate who has a good amount of cash, this should be a nice pickup for the Republican party.

The last four governors of Massachusetts prior to Patrick were all Republicans.
Logged
SamInTheSouth
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 389


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: May 21, 2009, 09:47:32 PM »

i really hope deval makes a stand against the sales tax increase.  if his veto is overridden he needs to put up a fight in public.  go on media,  make a stand.

he is too weak.

i like deval. but he has no backbone.

You guys have effectively installed a one party rule in your state so you have no right to complain when things go badly.  You have elected no opposition.  What do you expect?
Logged
Small Business Owner of Any Repute
Mr. Moderate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,431
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: May 22, 2009, 01:12:39 PM »

It cracks me up to think a Republican could win such a Democratic state...
But...
If Republicans put up a crap candidate, no. But if we put up a nice moderate who has a good amount of cash, this should be a nice pickup for the Republican party.

The last four governors of Massachusetts prior to Patrick were all Republicans.

And all of them have had better relations with the Democratic legislature than Patrick.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.045 seconds with 13 queries.